diff mbox series

[dwarves,v2] btf: Add support for the floating-point types

Message ID 20210308235913.162038-1-iii@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [dwarves,v2] btf: Add support for the floating-point types | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Ilya Leoshkevich March 8, 2021, 11:59 p.m. UTC
Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.

Fix as follows:

- Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.

- Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so that
  pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer kernels.

- libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in commit
  986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and use
  the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the floating-point
  types when not in the compatibility mode and base_type.float_type is
  set.

- Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.

Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:

    [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8

when building with:

    LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --libbpf_compat=0.4.0

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/20210306022203.152930-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2: Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter.
          The code should now work for both bpf-next/master and
          v5.12-rc2.

 btf_loader.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 dwarf_loader.c | 11 +++++++++++
 lib/bpf        |  2 +-
 libbtf.c       | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 libbtf.h       |  8 ++++++++
 pahole.c       | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo March 9, 2021, 11:48 a.m. UTC | #1
Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich escreveu:
> Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
> arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.
> 
> Fix as follows:
> 
> - Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.
> 
> - Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so that
>   pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer kernels.
> 
> - libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in commit
>   986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and use
>   the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the floating-point
>   types when not in the compatibility mode and base_type.float_type is
>   set.
> 
> - Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.
> 
> Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:
> 
>     [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8
> 
> when building with:
> 
>     LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --libbpf_compat=0.4.0

I'm testing it now, and added as a followup patch the man page entry,
please check that the wording is appropriate.

Thanks,

- Arnaldo

[acme@five pahole]$ vim man-pages/pahole.1
[acme@five pahole]$ git diff
diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1
index 352bb5e45f319da4..787771753d1933b1 100644
--- a/man-pages/pahole.1
+++ b/man-pages/pahole.1
@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ Path to the base BTF file, for instance: vmlinux when encoding kernel module BTF
 This may be inferred when asking for a /sys/kernel/btf/MODULE, when it will be autoconfigured
 to "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux".

+.TP
+.B \-\-libbpf_compat=LIBBPF_VERSION
+Produce output compatible with this libbpf version. For instance, specifying 0.4.0 as
+the version would encode BTF_KIND_FLOAT entries in systems where the vmlinux DWARF
+information has float types.
+
 .TP
 .B \-l, \-\-show_first_biggest_size_base_type_member
 Show first biggest size base_type member.
[acme@five pahole]$
Ilya Leoshkevich March 9, 2021, 1:06 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 08:48 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich escreveu:
> > Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
> > arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.
> > 
> > Fix as follows:
> > 
> > - Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.
> > 
> > - Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so
> > that
> >   pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer
> > kernels.
> > 
> > - libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in
> > commit
> >   986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and
> > use
> >   the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the floating-
> > point
> >   types when not in the compatibility mode and base_type.float_type
> > is
> >   set.
> > 
> > - Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.
> > 
> > Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:
> > 
> >     [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8
> > 
> > when building with:
> > 
> >     LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --libbpf_compat=0.4.0
> 
> I'm testing it now, and added as a followup patch the man page entry,
> please check that the wording is appropriate.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> [acme@five pahole]$ vim man-pages/pahole.1
> [acme@five pahole]$ git diff
> diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1
> index 352bb5e45f319da4..787771753d1933b1 100644
> --- a/man-pages/pahole.1
> +++ b/man-pages/pahole.1
> @@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ Path to the base BTF file, for instance: vmlinux
> when encoding kernel module BTF
>  This may be inferred when asking for a /sys/kernel/btf/MODULE, when
> it will be autoconfigured
>  to "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux".
> 
> +.TP
> +.B \-\-libbpf_compat=LIBBPF_VERSION
> +Produce output compatible with this libbpf version. For instance,
> specifying 0.4.0 as
> +the version would encode BTF_KIND_FLOAT entries in systems where the
> vmlinux DWARF
> +information has float types.
> +
>  .TP
>  .B \-l, \-\-show_first_biggest_size_base_type_member
>  Show first biggest size base_type member.
> [acme@five pahole]$

The wording matches what I had in mind for this new flag, thanks!
Andrii Nakryiko March 9, 2021, 9:37 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:48 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich escreveu:
> > Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
> > arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.
> >
> > Fix as follows:
> >
> > - Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.
> >
> > - Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so that
> >   pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer kernels.
> >
> > - libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in commit
> >   986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and use
> >   the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the floating-point
> >   types when not in the compatibility mode and base_type.float_type is
> >   set.
> >
> > - Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.
> >
> > Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:
> >
> >     [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8
> >
> > when building with:
> >
> >     LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --libbpf_compat=0.4.0
>
> I'm testing it now, and added as a followup patch the man page entry,
> please check that the wording is appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> [acme@five pahole]$ vim man-pages/pahole.1
> [acme@five pahole]$ git diff
> diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1
> index 352bb5e45f319da4..787771753d1933b1 100644
> --- a/man-pages/pahole.1
> +++ b/man-pages/pahole.1
> @@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ Path to the base BTF file, for instance: vmlinux when encoding kernel module BTF
>  This may be inferred when asking for a /sys/kernel/btf/MODULE, when it will be autoconfigured
>  to "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux".
>
> +.TP
> +.B \-\-libbpf_compat=LIBBPF_VERSION
> +Produce output compatible with this libbpf version. For instance, specifying 0.4.0 as
> +the version would encode BTF_KIND_FLOAT entries in systems where the vmlinux DWARF
> +information has float types.

TBH, I think it's not exactly right to call out libbpf version here.
It's BTF "version" (if we had such a thing) that determines the set of
supported BTF kinds. There could be other libraries that might want to
parse BTF. So I don't know what this should be called, but
libbpf_compat is probably a wrong name for it.

If we do want to teach pahole to not emit some parts of BTF, it should
probably be a set of BPF features, not some arbitrary library
versions.


> +
>  .TP
>  .B \-l, \-\-show_first_biggest_size_base_type_member
>  Show first biggest size base_type member.
> [acme@five pahole]$
Ilya Leoshkevich March 9, 2021, 9:57 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:37 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:48 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <
> acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich
> > escreveu:
> > > Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
> > > arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.
> > > 
> > > Fix as follows:
> > > 
> > > - Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.
> > > 
> > > - Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so
> > > that
> > >   pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer
> > > kernels.
> > > 
> > > - libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in
> > > commit
> > >   986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and
> > > use
> > >   the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the
> > > floating-point
> > >   types when not in the compatibility mode and
> > > base_type.float_type is
> > >   set.
> > > 
> > > - Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.
> > > 
> > > Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:
> > > 
> > >     [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8
> > > 
> > > when building with:
> > > 
> > >     LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --
> > > libbpf_compat=0.4.0
> > 
> > I'm testing it now, and added as a followup patch the man page
> > entry,
> > please check that the wording is appropriate.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > - Arnaldo
> > 
> > [acme@five pahole]$ vim man-pages/pahole.1
> > [acme@five pahole]$ git diff
> > diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1
> > index 352bb5e45f319da4..787771753d1933b1 100644
> > --- a/man-pages/pahole.1
> > +++ b/man-pages/pahole.1
> > @@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ Path to the base BTF file, for instance:
> > vmlinux when encoding kernel module BTF
> >  This may be inferred when asking for a /sys/kernel/btf/MODULE,
> > when it will be autoconfigured
> >  to "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux".
> > 
> > +.TP
> > +.B \-\-libbpf_compat=LIBBPF_VERSION
> > +Produce output compatible with this libbpf version. For instance,
> > specifying 0.4.0 as
> > +the version would encode BTF_KIND_FLOAT entries in systems where
> > the vmlinux DWARF
> > +information has float types.
> 
> TBH, I think it's not exactly right to call out libbpf version here.
> It's BTF "version" (if we had such a thing) that determines the set
> of
> supported BTF kinds. There could be other libraries that might want
> to
> parse BTF. So I don't know what this should be called, but
> libbpf_compat is probably a wrong name for it.

BTF version seems to exist: btf_header.version. Should we maybe bump
this?

> 
> If we do want to teach pahole to not emit some parts of BTF, it
> should
> probably be a set of BPF features, not some arbitrary library
> versions.

I thought about just adding --btf-allow-floats, but if new features
will be added in the future, the list of options will become unwieldy.
So I thought it would be good to settle for something that increases
monotonically.
Andrii Nakryiko March 10, 2021, 4:14 a.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:57 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:37 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:48 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <
> > acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich
> > > escreveu:
> > > > Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
> > > > arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types.
> > > >
> > > > Fix as follows:
> > > >
> > > > - Make the DWARF loader fill base_type.float_type.
> > > >
> > > > - Introduce libbpf compatibility level command-line parameter, so
> > > > that
> > > >   pahole could be used to build both the older and the newer
> > > > kernels.
> > > >
> > > > - libbpf introduced the support for the floating-point types in
> > > > commit
> > > >   986962fade5, so update the libbpf submodule to that version and
> > > > use
> > > >   the new btf__add_float() function in order to emit the
> > > > floating-point
> > > >   types when not in the compatibility mode and
> > > > base_type.float_type is
> > > >   set.
> > > >
> > > > - Make the BTF loader recognize the new BTF kind.
> > > >
> > > > Example of the resulting entry in the vmlinux BTF:
> > > >
> > > >     [7164] FLOAT 'double' size=8
> > > >
> > > > when building with:
> > > >
> > > >     LLVM_OBJCOPY=${OBJCOPY} ${PAHOLE} -J ${1} --
> > > > libbpf_compat=0.4.0
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now, and added as a followup patch the man page
> > > entry,
> > > please check that the wording is appropriate.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > - Arnaldo
> > >
> > > [acme@five pahole]$ vim man-pages/pahole.1
> > > [acme@five pahole]$ git diff
> > > diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1
> > > index 352bb5e45f319da4..787771753d1933b1 100644
> > > --- a/man-pages/pahole.1
> > > +++ b/man-pages/pahole.1
> > > @@ -199,6 +199,12 @@ Path to the base BTF file, for instance:
> > > vmlinux when encoding kernel module BTF
> > >  This may be inferred when asking for a /sys/kernel/btf/MODULE,
> > > when it will be autoconfigured
> > >  to "/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux".
> > >
> > > +.TP
> > > +.B \-\-libbpf_compat=LIBBPF_VERSION
> > > +Produce output compatible with this libbpf version. For instance,
> > > specifying 0.4.0 as
> > > +the version would encode BTF_KIND_FLOAT entries in systems where
> > > the vmlinux DWARF
> > > +information has float types.
> >
> > TBH, I think it's not exactly right to call out libbpf version here.
> > It's BTF "version" (if we had such a thing) that determines the set
> > of
> > supported BTF kinds. There could be other libraries that might want
> > to
> > parse BTF. So I don't know what this should be called, but
> > libbpf_compat is probably a wrong name for it.
>
> BTF version seems to exist: btf_header.version. Should we maybe bump
> this?

That seems excessive. If the kernel doesn't use FLOATs, then no one
would even notice a difference. While if we bump this version, then
everything will automatically become incompatible.

>
> >
> > If we do want to teach pahole to not emit some parts of BTF, it
> > should
> > probably be a set of BPF features, not some arbitrary library
> > versions.
>
> I thought about just adding --btf-allow-floats, but if new features
> will be added in the future, the list of options will become unwieldy.
> So I thought it would be good to settle for something that increases
> monotonically.
>

BTF_KIND_FLOAT is the first extension in a long while. I'd worry about
the proliferation of new options when we actually see some proof of
that being a problem in practice.
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo March 10, 2021, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #6
Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:14:50PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:57 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:37 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:48 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich escreveu:
> > > TBH, I think it's not exactly right to call out libbpf version
> > > here.  It's BTF "version" (if we had such a thing) that determines
> > > the set of supported BTF kinds. There could be other libraries
> > > that might want to parse BTF. So I don't know what this should be
> > > called, but libbpf_compat is probably a wrong name for it.

> > BTF version seems to exist: btf_header.version. Should we maybe bump
> > this?
 
> That seems excessive. If the kernel doesn't use FLOATs, then no one
> would even notice a difference. While if we bump this version, then
> everything will automatically become incompatible.

> > > If we do want to teach pahole to not emit some parts of BTF, it
> > > should
> > > probably be a set of BPF features, not some arbitrary library
> > > versions.

> > I thought about just adding --btf-allow-floats, but if new features
> > will be added in the future, the list of options will become unwieldy.
> > So I thought it would be good to settle for something that increases
> > monotonically.
 
> BTF_KIND_FLOAT is the first extension in a long while. I'd worry about
> the proliferation of new options when we actually see some proof of
> that being a problem in practice.

I tend to agree, Ilya, can you rework the patch in that direction?
Something like --encode-btf-kind-float that starts disabled or other
suitable name?

- Arnaldo
Ilya Leoshkevich March 10, 2021, 1:39 p.m. UTC | #7
On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 10:37 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:14:50PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko escreveu:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:57 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:37 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:48 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > > <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > Em Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich
> > > > > escreveu:
> > > > TBH, I think it's not exactly right to call out libbpf version
> > > > here.  It's BTF "version" (if we had such a thing) that
> > > > determines
> > > > the set of supported BTF kinds. There could be other libraries
> > > > that might want to parse BTF. So I don't know what this should
> > > > be
> > > > called, but libbpf_compat is probably a wrong name for it.
> 
> > > BTF version seems to exist: btf_header.version. Should we maybe
> > > bump
> > > this?
>  
> > That seems excessive. If the kernel doesn't use FLOATs, then no one
> > would even notice a difference. While if we bump this version, then
> > everything will automatically become incompatible.
> 
> > > > If we do want to teach pahole to not emit some parts of BTF, it
> > > > should
> > > > probably be a set of BPF features, not some arbitrary library
> > > > versions.
> 
> > > I thought about just adding --btf-allow-floats, but if new
> > > features
> > > will be added in the future, the list of options will become
> > > unwieldy.
> > > So I thought it would be good to settle for something that
> > > increases
> > > monotonically.
>  
> > BTF_KIND_FLOAT is the first extension in a long while. I'd worry
> > about
> > the proliferation of new options when we actually see some proof of
> > that being a problem in practice.
> 
> I tend to agree, Ilya, can you rework the patch in that direction?
> Something like --encode-btf-kind-float that starts disabled or other
> suitable name?
> 
> - Arnaldo

Sure, I'm actually testing v3 that does this right now. So far I went
with simply --btf_float, but I'll change it to the more explicit 
--encode_btf_kind_float.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/btf_loader.c b/btf_loader.c
index ec286f4..7cc39aa 100644
--- a/btf_loader.c
+++ b/btf_loader.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@  static struct variable *variable__new(strings_t name, uint32_t linkage)
 	return var;
 }
 
-static int create_new_base_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct btf_type *tp, uint32_t id)
+static int create_new_int_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct btf_type *tp, uint32_t id)
 {
 	uint32_t attrs = btf_int_encoding(tp);
 	strings_t name = tp->name_off;
@@ -175,6 +175,20 @@  static int create_new_base_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct btf_type *tp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int create_new_float_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct btf_type *tp, uint32_t id)
+{
+	strings_t name = tp->name_off;
+	struct base_type *base = base_type__new(name, 0, BT_FP_SINGLE, tp->size * 8);
+
+	if (base == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	base->tag.tag = DW_TAG_base_type;
+	cu__add_tag_with_id(btfe->priv, &base->tag, id);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int create_new_array(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct btf_type *tp, uint32_t id)
 {
 	struct btf_array *ap = btf_array(tp);
@@ -397,7 +411,7 @@  static int btf_elf__load_types(struct btf_elf *btfe)
 
 		switch (type) {
 		case BTF_KIND_INT:
-			err = create_new_base_type(btfe, type_ptr, type_index);
+			err = create_new_int_type(btfe, type_ptr, type_index);
 			break;
 		case BTF_KIND_ARRAY:
 			err = create_new_array(btfe, type_ptr, type_index);
@@ -442,6 +456,9 @@  static int btf_elf__load_types(struct btf_elf *btfe)
 			// BTF_KIND_FUNC corresponding to a defined subprogram.
 			err = create_new_function(btfe, type_ptr, type_index);
 			break;
+		case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
+			err = create_new_float_type(btfe, type_ptr, type_index);
+			break;
 		default:
 			fprintf(stderr, "BTF: idx: %d, Unknown kind %d\n", type_index, type);
 			fflush(stderr);
diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
index b73d786..c5e6681 100644
--- a/dwarf_loader.c
+++ b/dwarf_loader.c
@@ -461,6 +461,16 @@  static struct ptr_to_member_type *ptr_to_member_type__new(Dwarf_Die *die,
 	return ptr;
 }
 
+static uint8_t encoding_to_float_type(uint64_t encoding)
+{
+	switch (encoding) {
+	case DW_ATE_complex_float:	return BT_FP_CMPLX;
+	case DW_ATE_float:		return BT_FP_SINGLE;
+	case DW_ATE_imaginary_float:	return BT_FP_IMGRY;
+	default:			return 0;
+	}
+}
+
 static struct base_type *base_type__new(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu)
 {
 	struct base_type *bt = tag__alloc(cu, sizeof(*bt));
@@ -474,6 +484,7 @@  static struct base_type *base_type__new(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu)
 		bt->is_signed = encoding == DW_ATE_signed;
 		bt->is_varargs = false;
 		bt->name_has_encoding = true;
+		bt->float_type = encoding_to_float_type(encoding);
 	}
 
 	return bt;
diff --git a/lib/bpf b/lib/bpf
index 5af3d86..986962f 160000
--- a/lib/bpf
+++ b/lib/bpf
@@ -1 +1 @@ 
-Subproject commit 5af3d86b5a2c5fecdc3ab83822d083edd32b4396
+Subproject commit 986962fade5dfa89c2890f3854eb040d2a64ab38
diff --git a/libbtf.c b/libbtf.c
index 9f76283..c8a1dc1 100644
--- a/libbtf.c
+++ b/libbtf.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ 
 struct btf *base_btf;
 uint8_t btf_elf__verbose;
 uint8_t btf_elf__force;
+int libbpf_compat = LIBBPF_COMPAT_MIN;
 
 static int btf_var_secinfo_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
 {
@@ -227,6 +228,7 @@  static const char * const btf_kind_str[NR_BTF_KINDS] = {
 	[BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO]	= "FUNC_PROTO",
 	[BTF_KIND_VAR]          = "VAR",
 	[BTF_KIND_DATASEC]      = "DATASEC",
+	[BTF_KIND_FLOAT]        = "FLOAT",
 };
 
 static const char *btf_elf__printable_name(const struct btf_elf *btfe, uint32_t offset)
@@ -367,6 +369,27 @@  static void btf_log_func_param(const struct btf_elf *btfe,
 	}
 }
 
+static int32_t btf_elf__add_float_type(struct btf_elf *btfe,
+				       const struct base_type *bt,
+				       const char *name)
+{
+	int32_t id;
+
+	id = btf__add_float(btfe->btf, name, BITS_ROUNDUP_BYTES(bt->bit_size));
+	if (id < 0) {
+		btf_elf__log_err(btfe, BTF_KIND_FLOAT, name, true, "Error emitting BTF type");
+	} else {
+		const struct btf_type *t;
+
+		t = btf__type_by_id(btfe->btf, id);
+		btf_elf__log_type(btfe, t, false, true,
+				  "size=%u nr_bits=%u",
+				  t->size, bt->bit_size);
+	}
+
+	return id;
+}
+
 int32_t btf_elf__add_base_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct base_type *bt,
 			       const char *name)
 {
@@ -379,8 +402,17 @@  int32_t btf_elf__add_base_type(struct btf_elf *btfe, const struct base_type *bt,
 		encoding = BTF_INT_SIGNED;
 	} else if (bt->is_bool) {
 		encoding = BTF_INT_BOOL;
-	} else if (bt->float_type) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "float_type is not supported\n");
+	} else if (bt->float_type && libbpf_compat >= LIBBPF_COMPAT_FLOAT) {
+		/*
+		 * Encode floats using libbpf. In compatibility mode, encode
+		 * them as ints - that's not fully correct, but that's what it
+		 * used to be.
+		 */
+		if (bt->float_type == BT_FP_SINGLE ||
+		    bt->float_type == BT_FP_DOUBLE ||
+		    bt->float_type == BT_FP_LDBL)
+			return btf_elf__add_float_type(btfe, bt, name);
+		fprintf(stderr, "Complex, interval and imaginary float types are not supported\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
diff --git a/libbtf.h b/libbtf.h
index 191f586..9fe42be 100644
--- a/libbtf.h
+++ b/libbtf.h
@@ -36,6 +36,14 @@  extern uint8_t btf_elf__verbose;
 extern uint8_t btf_elf__force;
 #define btf_elf__verbose_log(fmt, ...) { if (btf_elf__verbose) printf(fmt, __VA_ARGS__); }
 
+/* DEBUG_INFO_BTF was added in Linux 5.2, which corresponds to libbpf 0.0.3. */
+#define LIBBPF_COMPAT_MIN 0x000003
+
+/* The floating-point types were added in libbpf 0.4.0. */
+#define LIBBPF_COMPAT_FLOAT 0x000400
+
+extern int libbpf_compat;
+
 #define PERCPU_SECTION ".data..percpu"
 
 struct cu;
diff --git a/pahole.c b/pahole.c
index 4a34ba5..74d2cbb 100644
--- a/pahole.c
+++ b/pahole.c
@@ -825,6 +825,7 @@  ARGP_PROGRAM_VERSION_HOOK_DEF = dwarves_print_version;
 #define ARGP_just_packed_structs   319
 #define ARGP_numeric_version       320
 #define ARGP_btf_base		   321
+#define ARGP_libbpf_compat	   322
 
 static const struct argp_option pahole__options[] = {
 	{
@@ -1119,6 +1120,12 @@  static const struct argp_option pahole__options[] = {
 		.key  = ARGP_btf_encode_force,
 		.doc  = "Ignore those symbols found invalid when encoding BTF."
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "libbpf_compat",
+		.key  = ARGP_libbpf_compat,
+		.arg  = "LIBBPF_VERSION",
+		.doc  = "Produce output compatible with this libbpf version."
+	},
 	{
 		.name = "structs",
 		.key  = ARGP_just_structs,
@@ -1144,6 +1151,23 @@  static const struct argp_option pahole__options[] = {
 	}
 };
 
+static int parse_version(char *arg)
+{
+	int version, patchlevel = 0, extraversion = 0;
+	char *dot;
+
+	version = atoi(arg);
+	dot = strchr(arg, '.');
+	if (dot) {
+		patchlevel = atoi(dot + 1);
+		dot = strchr(dot + 1, '.');
+		if (dot)
+			extraversion = atoi(dot + 1);
+	}
+
+	return (version << 16) | (patchlevel << 8) | extraversion;
+}
+
 static error_t pahole__options_parser(int key, char *arg,
 				      struct argp_state *state)
 {
@@ -1254,6 +1278,8 @@  static error_t pahole__options_parser(int key, char *arg,
 		base_btf_file = arg;			break;
 	case ARGP_numeric_version:
 		print_numeric_version = true;		break;
+	case ARGP_libbpf_compat:
+		libbpf_compat = parse_version(arg);	break;
 	default:
 		return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN;
 	}