| Message ID | 20210326215927.936377-16-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
Hi Pierre, On 3/26/21 11:59 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > cppcheck warning: > > sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:379:11: style: The if condition is the same > as the previous if condition [duplicateCondition] > > if (mcbsp->irq) { > ^ > sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:376:11: note: First condition > if (mcbsp->irq) > ^ > sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:379:11: note: Second condition > if (mcbsp->irq) { > ^ > > Keeping two separate tests was probably intentional for clarity, but > since this generates warnings we might as well make cppcheck happy so > that we have fewer warnings. There might be other historical reasons why it ended up like this but merging them does not make it less cleaner. Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > --- > sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c > index 6025b30bbe77..db47981768c5 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c > +++ b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c > @@ -373,10 +373,9 @@ static void omap_mcbsp_free(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp) > MCBSP_WRITE(mcbsp, WAKEUPEN, 0); > > /* Disable interrupt requests */ > - if (mcbsp->irq) > + if (mcbsp->irq) { > MCBSP_WRITE(mcbsp, IRQEN, 0); > > - if (mcbsp->irq) { > free_irq(mcbsp->irq, (void *)mcbsp); > } else { > free_irq(mcbsp->rx_irq, (void *)mcbsp); >
diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c index 6025b30bbe77..db47981768c5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c +++ b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c @@ -373,10 +373,9 @@ static void omap_mcbsp_free(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp) MCBSP_WRITE(mcbsp, WAKEUPEN, 0); /* Disable interrupt requests */ - if (mcbsp->irq) + if (mcbsp->irq) { MCBSP_WRITE(mcbsp, IRQEN, 0); - if (mcbsp->irq) { free_irq(mcbsp->irq, (void *)mcbsp); } else { free_irq(mcbsp->rx_irq, (void *)mcbsp);
cppcheck warning: sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:379:11: style: The if condition is the same as the previous if condition [duplicateCondition] if (mcbsp->irq) { ^ sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:376:11: note: First condition if (mcbsp->irq) ^ sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c:379:11: note: Second condition if (mcbsp->irq) { ^ Keeping two separate tests was probably intentional for clarity, but since this generates warnings we might as well make cppcheck happy so that we have fewer warnings. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> --- sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)