Message ID | cover.1617893234.git.matheus.bernardino@usp.br (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Parallel Checkout (part 2) | expand |
Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> writes: > This is the next step in the parallel checkout implementation. As > mt/parallel-checkout-part-1 is now on master, this round is based > directly on master. Thanks, will replace.
Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> writes: > This is the next step in the parallel checkout implementation. As > mt/parallel-checkout-part-1 is now on master, this round is based > directly on master. > > Changes since v1: Now, I do not think we've seen any response to these messages. It seems that review comments for the earlier round cf. <CAP8UFD1stvx=2hBWyxmu75SXRzX-bHBfGr2jxWKgHdc85cfxRg@mail.gmail.com> have been addressed? Should we merge it down to 'next' now?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:43 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> writes: > > > This is the next step in the parallel checkout implementation. As > > mt/parallel-checkout-part-1 is now on master, this round is based > > directly on master. > > > > Changes since v1: > > Now, I do not think we've seen any response to these messages. > > It seems that review comments for the earlier round cf. > <CAP8UFD1stvx=2hBWyxmu75SXRzX-bHBfGr2jxWKgHdc85cfxRg@mail.gmail.com> > > have been addressed? Should we merge it down to 'next' now? Yes, I think I've addressed all the comments from the previous round. There is just a minor change that I made locally yesterday, so I'll reroll the series with it now. Nonetheless, the change is quite small and trivial, so I think the rerolled version can be merged to 'next'.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:43 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> writes: > > > This is the next step in the parallel checkout implementation. As > > mt/parallel-checkout-part-1 is now on master, this round is based > > directly on master. > > > > Changes since v1: > > Now, I do not think we've seen any response to these messages. > > It seems that review comments for the earlier round cf. > <CAP8UFD1stvx=2hBWyxmu75SXRzX-bHBfGr2jxWKgHdc85cfxRg@mail.gmail.com> > > have been addressed? Should we merge it down to 'next' now? Yeah, my concerns in v1 were all addressed. I took another look at v3 and found only small nits in the documentation patch. For what it's worth, with or without the small nits addressed, the v3 has my: Reviewed-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>