Message ID | 20210415231530.95464-3-snitzer@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | nvme: improve error handling and ana_state to work well with dm-multipath | expand |
On 4/16/21 1:15 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > > REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT was designed for SCSI, because the SCSI protocol > does not define the local retry mechanism. SCSI implements a fuzzy > local retry mechanism, so REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is needed to allow > higher-level multipathing software to perform failover/retry. > > NVMe is different with SCSI about this. It defines a local retry > mechanism and path error codes, so NVMe should retry local for non > path error. If path related error, whether to retry and how to retry > is still determined by higher-level multipathing's failover. > > Unlike SCSI, NVMe shouldn't prevent retry if REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT > because NVMe's local retry is needed -- as is NVMe specific logic to > categorize whether an error is path related. > > In this way, the mechanism of NVMe multipath or other multipath are > now equivalent. The mechanism is: non path related error will be > retried locally, path related error is handled by multipath. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > [snitzer: edited header for grammar and clarity, also added code comment] > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > index 540d6fd8ffef..4134cf3c7e48 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > @@ -306,7 +306,14 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req) > if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0)) > return COMPLETE; > > - if (blk_noretry_request(req) || > + /* > + * REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set by upper layer software that > + * handles multipathing. Unlike SCSI, NVMe's error handling was > + * specifically designed to handle local retry for non-path errors. > + * As such, allow NVMe's local retry mechanism to be used for > + * requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. > + */ > + if ((req->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) || > (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) || > nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries) > return COMPLETE; > Huh? #define blk_noretry_request(rq) \ ((rq)->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV|REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT| \ REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) making the only _actual_ change in your patch _not_ evaluating the REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER, which incidentally is only used by the NVMe core. So what is it you're trying to solve? Cheers, Hannes
On Fri, Apr 16 2021 at 10:01am -0400, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote: > On 4/16/21 1:15 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > > > > REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT was designed for SCSI, because the SCSI protocol > > does not define the local retry mechanism. SCSI implements a fuzzy > > local retry mechanism, so REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is needed to allow > > higher-level multipathing software to perform failover/retry. > > > > NVMe is different with SCSI about this. It defines a local retry > > mechanism and path error codes, so NVMe should retry local for non > > path error. If path related error, whether to retry and how to retry > > is still determined by higher-level multipathing's failover. > > > > Unlike SCSI, NVMe shouldn't prevent retry if REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT > > because NVMe's local retry is needed -- as is NVMe specific logic to > > categorize whether an error is path related. > > > > In this way, the mechanism of NVMe multipath or other multipath are > > now equivalent. The mechanism is: non path related error will be > > retried locally, path related error is handled by multipath. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > > [snitzer: edited header for grammar and clarity, also added code comment] > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 9 ++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > > index 540d6fd8ffef..4134cf3c7e48 100644 > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > > @@ -306,7 +306,14 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req) > > if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0)) > > return COMPLETE; > > > > - if (blk_noretry_request(req) || > > + /* > > + * REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set by upper layer software that > > + * handles multipathing. Unlike SCSI, NVMe's error handling was > > + * specifically designed to handle local retry for non-path errors. > > + * As such, allow NVMe's local retry mechanism to be used for > > + * requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. > > + */ > > + if ((req->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) || > > (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) || > > nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries) > > return COMPLETE; > > > Huh? > > #define blk_noretry_request(rq) \ > ((rq)->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV|REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT| \ > REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) > > making the only _actual_ change in your patch _not_ evaluating the > REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER, which incidentally is only used by the NVMe core. No, not sure how you got there. I'd have thought the 5 references to "REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT" would've been sufficient ;) This patch makes it so requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT are allowed to use NVMe's local retry (that is required for non-transport errors). > So what is it you're trying to solve? What the patch header, code and code comment detail. Mike
On 4/16/21 4:53 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16 2021 at 10:01am -0400, > Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote: > >> On 4/16/21 1:15 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: >>> From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> >>> >>> REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT was designed for SCSI, because the SCSI protocol >>> does not define the local retry mechanism. SCSI implements a fuzzy >>> local retry mechanism, so REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is needed to allow >>> higher-level multipathing software to perform failover/retry. >>> >>> NVMe is different with SCSI about this. It defines a local retry >>> mechanism and path error codes, so NVMe should retry local for non >>> path error. If path related error, whether to retry and how to retry >>> is still determined by higher-level multipathing's failover. >>> >>> Unlike SCSI, NVMe shouldn't prevent retry if REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT >>> because NVMe's local retry is needed -- as is NVMe specific logic to >>> categorize whether an error is path related. >>> >>> In this way, the mechanism of NVMe multipath or other multipath are >>> now equivalent. The mechanism is: non path related error will be >>> retried locally, path related error is handled by multipath. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> >>> [snitzer: edited header for grammar and clarity, also added code comment] >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 9 ++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c >>> index 540d6fd8ffef..4134cf3c7e48 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c >>> @@ -306,7 +306,14 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req) >>> if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0)) >>> return COMPLETE; >>> >>> - if (blk_noretry_request(req) || >>> + /* >>> + * REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set by upper layer software that >>> + * handles multipathing. Unlike SCSI, NVMe's error handling was >>> + * specifically designed to handle local retry for non-path errors. >>> + * As such, allow NVMe's local retry mechanism to be used for >>> + * requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. >>> + */ >>> + if ((req->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) || >>> (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) || >>> nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries) >>> return COMPLETE; >>> >> Huh? >> >> #define blk_noretry_request(rq) \ >> ((rq)->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV|REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT| \ >> REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) >> >> making the only _actual_ change in your patch _not_ evaluating the >> REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER, which incidentally is only used by the NVMe core. > > No, not sure how you got there. I'd have thought the 5 references to > "REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT" would've been sufficient ;) > Ah. Misread stuff. You're excluding the REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT here. But then it's _actually_ similar to the next patch (which I've also commented). Wouldn't it be better to fold them into one patch and discuss things together; especially as my comment to the next one might actually achieve the same thing? Cheers, Hannes
On Fri, Apr 16 2021 at 11:20am -0400, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote: > On 4/16/21 4:53 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 16 2021 at 10:01am -0400, > > Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote: > > > >> On 4/16/21 1:15 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > >>> From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > >>> > >>> REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT was designed for SCSI, because the SCSI protocol > >>> does not define the local retry mechanism. SCSI implements a fuzzy > >>> local retry mechanism, so REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is needed to allow > >>> higher-level multipathing software to perform failover/retry. > >>> > >>> NVMe is different with SCSI about this. It defines a local retry > >>> mechanism and path error codes, so NVMe should retry local for non > >>> path error. If path related error, whether to retry and how to retry > >>> is still determined by higher-level multipathing's failover. > >>> > >>> Unlike SCSI, NVMe shouldn't prevent retry if REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT > >>> because NVMe's local retry is needed -- as is NVMe specific logic to > >>> categorize whether an error is path related. > >>> > >>> In this way, the mechanism of NVMe multipath or other multipath are > >>> now equivalent. The mechanism is: non path related error will be > >>> retried locally, path related error is handled by multipath. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> > >>> [snitzer: edited header for grammar and clarity, also added code comment] > >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 9 ++++++++- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > >>> index 540d6fd8ffef..4134cf3c7e48 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c > >>> @@ -306,7 +306,14 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req) > >>> if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0)) > >>> return COMPLETE; > >>> > >>> - if (blk_noretry_request(req) || > >>> + /* > >>> + * REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set by upper layer software that > >>> + * handles multipathing. Unlike SCSI, NVMe's error handling was > >>> + * specifically designed to handle local retry for non-path errors. > >>> + * As such, allow NVMe's local retry mechanism to be used for > >>> + * requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. > >>> + */ > >>> + if ((req->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) || > >>> (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) || > >>> nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries) > >>> return COMPLETE; > >>> > >> Huh? > >> > >> #define blk_noretry_request(rq) \ > >> ((rq)->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV|REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT| \ > >> REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) > >> > >> making the only _actual_ change in your patch _not_ evaluating the > >> REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER, which incidentally is only used by the NVMe core. > > > > No, not sure how you got there. I'd have thought the 5 references to > > "REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT" would've been sufficient ;) > > > > Ah. Misread stuff. You're excluding the REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT here. > But then it's _actually_ similar to the next patch (which I've also > commented). > > Wouldn't it be better to fold them into one patch and discuss things > together; especially as my comment to the next one might actually > achieve the same thing? 2 discrete things. This patch enables local retry. Patch 3 allows proper failover via upper layer multipathing. And as I replied, your suggestion about using DNR doesn't achieve the same thing (said as much in reply to the patch 3 thread). Mike
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c index 540d6fd8ffef..4134cf3c7e48 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c @@ -306,7 +306,14 @@ static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req) if (likely(nvme_req(req)->status == 0)) return COMPLETE; - if (blk_noretry_request(req) || + /* + * REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT is set by upper layer software that + * handles multipathing. Unlike SCSI, NVMe's error handling was + * specifically designed to handle local retry for non-path errors. + * As such, allow NVMe's local retry mechanism to be used for + * requests marked with REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT. + */ + if ((req->cmd_flags & (REQ_FAILFAST_DEV | REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER)) || (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR) || nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries) return COMPLETE;