diff mbox series

[RESEND,next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Message ID 20210305094937.GA141307@embeddedor (mailing list archive)
State Deferred
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [RESEND,next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com ap420073@gmail.com ndesaulniers@google.com nathan@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Gustavo A. R. Silva March 5, 2021, 9:49 a.m. UTC
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Simon Horman March 5, 2021, 12:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks Gustavo,

this looks good to me.

Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>  	case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
>  	case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
>  		nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.27.0
>
Gustavo A. R. Silva April 20, 2021, 8:23 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
>> through to the next case.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks Gustavo,
> 
> this looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>>  	case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
>>  	case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
>>  		nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
>> +		break;
>>  	default:
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>
Simon Horman April 21, 2021, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:23:39PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> >> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> >> through to the next case.
> >>
> >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Thanks Gustavo,
> > 
> > this looks good to me.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Hi Jakub, Hi David,

I'm happy to repost this patch if it would help with your processes.

> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> >>  	case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
> >>  	case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
> >>  		nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
> >> +		break;
> >>  	default:
> >>  		break;
> >>  	}
> >> -- 
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
Gustavo A. R. Silva May 18, 2021, 12:07 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi all,

I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp

On 4/21/21 04:39, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:23:39PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>>>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
>>>> through to the next case.
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> Thanks Gustavo,
>>>
>>> this looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
> 
> Hi Jakub, Hi David,
> 
> I'm happy to repost this patch if it would help with your processes.
> 
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>>>>  	case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
>>>>  	case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
>>>>  		nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
>>>> +		break;
>>>>  	default:
>>>>  		break;
>>>>  	}
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.27.0
>>>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@  nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
 	case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
 	case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
 		nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}