diff mbox series

[RESEND,next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Message ID 20210305092504.GA140204@embeddedor (mailing list archive)
State Deferred
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [RESEND,next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com ndesaulniers@google.com nathan@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Gustavo A. R. Silva March 5, 2021, 9:25 a.m. UTC
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Gustavo A. R. Silva April 20, 2021, 8:08 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 3/5/21 03:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
>  net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
> index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/link.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
>  			break;
>  		case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
>  			l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
> +			break;
>  		case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
>  		case LINK_RESET_EVT:
>  		case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT:
>
Xue, Ying April 21, 2021, 2:51 p.m. UTC | #2
This patch looks good to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> 
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:25 PM
To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>; Xue, Ying <Ying.Xue@windriver.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>; linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND][next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
 			break;
 		case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
 			l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
+			break;
 		case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
 		case LINK_RESET_EVT:
 		case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT:
--
2.27.0
Gustavo A. R. Silva May 18, 2021, 1:09 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi all,

If you don't mind, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp

On 4/21/21 09:51, Xue, Ying wrote:
> This patch looks good to me.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> 
> Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:25 PM
> To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>; Xue, Ying <Ying.Xue@windriver.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>; linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH RESEND][next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
> 
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
>  net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/link.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
>  			break;
>  		case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
>  			l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
> +			break;
>  		case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
>  		case LINK_RESET_EVT:
>  		case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT:
> --
> 2.27.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@  int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
 			break;
 		case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
 			l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
+			break;
 		case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
 		case LINK_RESET_EVT:
 		case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT: