| Message ID | 20210420131846.75983-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v1,1/1] spi: Rename enable1 to activate in spi_set_cs() | expand |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:18:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The enable1 is confusing name. Change it to clearly show what is > the intention behind it. No functional changes. Is this one okay or does it require some work?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:18:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > The enable1 is confusing name. Change it to clearly show what is > the intention behind it. No functional changes. Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] spi: Rename enable1 to activate in spi_set_cs() commit: 86527bcbc88922ea40df05d28189ee15489d2cf1 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c index b08efe88ccd6..74b2b1dd358b 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ int spi_register_board_info(struct spi_board_info const *info, unsigned n) static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) { - bool enable1 = enable; + bool activate = enable; /* * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if the chip select @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) if (spi->cs_gpiod || gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio) || !spi->controller->set_cs_timing) { - if (enable1) + if (activate) spi_delay_exec(&spi->controller->cs_setup, NULL); else spi_delay_exec(&spi->controller->cs_hold, NULL); @@ -825,8 +825,7 @@ static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) { if (spi->cs_gpiod) /* polarity handled by gpiolib */ - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi->cs_gpiod, - enable1); + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi->cs_gpiod, activate); else /* * invert the enable line, as active low is @@ -844,7 +843,7 @@ static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) if (spi->cs_gpiod || gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio) || !spi->controller->set_cs_timing) { - if (!enable1) + if (!activate) spi_delay_exec(&spi->controller->cs_inactive, NULL); } }
The enable1 is confusing name. Change it to clearly show what is the intention behind it. No functional changes. Fixes: 25093bdeb6bc ("spi: implement SW control for CS times") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)