mbox series

[GIT,PULL,0/6] ARM SoC branches for 5.13

Message ID CAK8P3a2RjRSjTcmwVf3VHy2CUB2HBj5AaJTx=1NSYuA_Qy4E-w@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series ARM SoC branches for 5.13 | expand

Message

Arnd Bergmann April 26, 2021, 3:52 p.m. UTC
Here are six branches for the SoC tree for the 5.13 merge window.
There are a couple
of new SoCs this time, with the initial Apple M1 support being the
most exciting one.
The STM32H750 platform is also noteworthy because it's fairly
unexpected to still
see new MMU-less boards.

The arm-apple-m1-5.13 tag includes changes from the tty and arm64
trees, so it would
be good to merge those first in order to get a neater git history.
Both have been
submitted today by Greg and Catalin.

As usual, the changes are mostly for devicetree files, aside from the
ongoing cleanup
work to omap2 and driver work for tegra and socfpga.  About two thirds
this of the
overall changes this time are for 64-bit machines, which is more than usual but
fits in with the long-term trend.

A few more statistics: There are 863 non-merge commits this time, from 195
authors. These twenty people have done more than ten changes each:

     79 Tony Lindgren
     47 Krzysztof Kozlowski
     38 Cristian Marussi
     28 Vinod Koul
     28 Dmitry Osipenko
     21 Manivannan Sadhasivam
     18 Hector Martin
     18 Geert Uytterhoeven
     18 Dong Aisheng
     18 Arnd Bergmann
     17 Sai Prakash Ranjan
     17 Rafał Miłecki
     15 Jagan Teki
     12 Stephen Boyd
     12 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
     11 Linus Walleij
     11 Jonathan Neuschäfer
     11 Heiko Stuebner
     11 Eddie James
     11 Chunfeng Yun

This is the total diffstat:

   0.6% Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/
   0.2% Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/
   0.3% Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/
   0.2% Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/
   0.2% Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
   1.6% Documentation/driver-api/
  23.1% arch/arm/boot/dts/
   0.5% arch/arm/configs/
   4.8% arch/arm/mach-omap2/
   1.2% arch/arm/
   0.2% arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/
   0.8% arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/
   0.3% arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/
   0.5% arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm4908/
   8.1% arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/
   0.6% arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/
   0.4% arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/
   3.1% arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/
  14.4% arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/
   2.3% arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/
   0.8% arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/
   8.3% arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/
   0.2% arch/arm64/include/asm/
   0.2% arch/arm64/
   0.2% drivers/bus/
   0.4% drivers/clk/
   0.3% drivers/cpufreq/
   9.2% drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/
   0.6% drivers/firmware/
   1.7% drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/
   2.1% drivers/irqchip/
   1.2% drivers/memory/tegra/
   0.5% drivers/pwm/
   0.9% drivers/soc/fsl/qe/
   2.5% drivers/soc/mediatek/
   0.5% drivers/soc/qcom/
   0.5% drivers/soc/tegra/
   0.3% drivers/soc/
   0.4% drivers/tty/serial/
   1.2% drivers/
   1.3% include/linux/
   0.2% include/soc/
   0.2% include/
 774 files changed, 35247 insertions(+), 8091 deletions(-)

Comments

Linus Torvalds April 26, 2021, 7:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:53 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Here are six branches for the SoC tree [...]

Ok, all merged. Please do check my conflict resolutions - not because
I think there is anything wrong there, but simply because the arm side
doesn't get the same build coverage testing when I merge.

All but the two first had some fairly trivial conflicts with the other
trees I've been merging today.

              Linus
Arnd Bergmann April 27, 2021, 9:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:41 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:53 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Here are six branches for the SoC tree [...]
>
> Ok, all merged. Please do check my conflict resolutions - not because
> I think there is anything wrong there, but simply because the arm side
> doesn't get the same build coverage testing when I merge.
>
> All but the two first had some fairly trivial conflicts with the other
> trees I've been merging today.

I've inspected the merges and ran the tree through my randconfig
test box for today. It seems you fixed one merge that went wrong
in linux-next, but you missed a harmless mismerge in a DT binding
documentation file. I've applied a fix to the arm/fixes branch now
and sent it to the list [1].

       Arnd

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210427210121.1080364-1-arnd@kernel.org/T/#u
patchwork-bot+linux-soc@kernel.org April 27, 2021, 9:22 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello:

This series was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes):

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:52:39 +0200 you wrote:
> Here are six branches for the SoC tree for the 5.13 merge window.
> There are a couple
> of new SoCs this time, with the initial Apple M1 support being the
> most exciting one.
> The STM32H750 platform is also noteworthy because it's fairly
> unexpected to still
> see new MMU-less boards.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [GIT,PULL,1/6] ARM: SoC changes for v5.13
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/01d713689441
  - [GIT,PULL,2/6] ARM: defconfigs for v5.13
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/2b90506a8186
  - [GIT,PULL,3/6] ARM: SoC drivers for v5.13
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/37f00ab4a003
  - [GIT,PULL,4/6] ARM: devicetree changes for 5.13
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/f7857bf3745e
  - [GIT,PULL,5/6] ARM: platform support for Nuvoton WPCM450
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/6b0fbc540c2f
  - [GIT,PULL,6/6,look,out,for,dependencies] ARM: platform support for Apple M1
    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/0c8555631820

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html