Message ID | 0-v1-d88406ed308e+418-vfio3_jgg@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more | expand |
On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Prologue > ======== > > This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor > remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim is useless and > complicates things. > > It applies on top of Alex's current tree and requires the prior two > series. Do you have a tree somewhere?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:43:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Prologue > > ======== > > > > This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor > > remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim is useless and > > complicates things. > > > > It applies on top of Alex's current tree and requires the prior two > > series. > > Do you have a tree somewhere? [..] > > A preview of the future series's is here: > > https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/pull/3/commits Has everything, you'll want to go to: cover-letter: Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more As there are additional WIPs in that tree. Jason
On 26.04.21 19:42, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:43:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> Prologue >>> ======== >>> >>> This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor >>> remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim is useless and >>> complicates things. >>> >>> It applies on top of Alex's current tree and requires the prior two >>> series. >> >> Do you have a tree somewhere? > > [..] >>> A preview of the future series's is here: >>> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/pull/3/commits > > Has everything, you'll want to go to: > cover-letter: Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more > > As there are additional WIPs in that tree. I gave this a quick spin on s390x vfio-ap and it seems to work ok. This is really just a quick test, but no obvious problem.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 09:33:56AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 26.04.21 19:42, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:43:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > Prologue > > > > ======== > > > > > > > > This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor > > > > remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim is useless and > > > > complicates things. > > > > > > > > It applies on top of Alex's current tree and requires the prior two > > > > series. > > > > > > Do you have a tree somewhere? > > > > [..] > > > > A preview of the future series's is here: > > > > https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/pull/3/commits > > > > Has everything, you'll want to go to: > > cover-letter: Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more > > > > As there are additional WIPs in that tree. > > I gave this a quick spin on s390x vfio-ap and it seems to work ok. > This is really just a quick test, but no obvious problem. Great! Thanks Jason