Message ID | 20210501082001.100533-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | media: uvcvideo: implement UVC 1.5 ROI | expand |
Hi Sergey, On 01/05/2021 10:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > This patch set implements UVC 1.5 ROI using v4l2_selection API. > > v5: > -- fixed UAPI typo: STABILIXATION > -- moved V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+36 > -- added more comments (Ricardo) > -- added V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to v4l2_ctrl_get_name() (Ricardo) > > Sergey Senozhatsky (5): > media: v4l UAPI: add ROI selection targets As mentioned in my reply to v4 0/5, I am quite strongly opposed to using the Selection API for this as opposed to using controls. Unless someone can provide strong arguments for using the Selection API, I am inclined to reject this. Sorry about that, I probably should have been reviewing this series sooner. Regards, Hans > media: v4l UAPI: document ROI selection targets > media: uvcvideo: add ROI auto controls > media: v4l UAPI: document ROI auto_controls > media: uvcvideo: add UVC 1.5 ROI control > > .../media/v4l/ext-ctrls-camera.rst | 23 +++ > .../media/v4l/selection-api-configuration.rst | 22 ++ > .../media/v4l/selection-api-examples.rst | 27 +++ > .../media/v4l/v4l2-selection-targets.rst | 24 +++ > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 19 ++ > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/usb/video.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h | 8 + > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 10 + > 10 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >
On (21/05/26 12:38), Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > On 01/05/2021 10:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patch set implements UVC 1.5 ROI using v4l2_selection API. > > > > v5: > > -- fixed UAPI typo: STABILIXATION > > -- moved V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+36 > > -- added more comments (Ricardo) > > -- added V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to v4l2_ctrl_get_name() (Ricardo) > > > > Sergey Senozhatsky (5): > > media: v4l UAPI: add ROI selection targets > > As mentioned in my reply to v4 0/5, I am quite strongly opposed to using the > Selection API for this as opposed to using controls. Unless someone can provide > strong arguments for using the Selection API, I am inclined to reject this. > > Sorry about that, I probably should have been reviewing this series sooner. Hans, any suggestions regarding the UVCs GET_CUR, GET_DEF, GET_MIN/MAX requests handling?
On 01/06/2021 10:46, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (21/05/26 12:38), Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Sergey, >> >> On 01/05/2021 10:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This patch set implements UVC 1.5 ROI using v4l2_selection API. >>> >>> v5: >>> -- fixed UAPI typo: STABILIXATION >>> -- moved V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+36 >>> -- added more comments (Ricardo) >>> -- added V4L2_CID_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO to v4l2_ctrl_get_name() (Ricardo) >>> >>> Sergey Senozhatsky (5): >>> media: v4l UAPI: add ROI selection targets >> >> As mentioned in my reply to v4 0/5, I am quite strongly opposed to using the >> Selection API for this as opposed to using controls. Unless someone can provide >> strong arguments for using the Selection API, I am inclined to reject this. >> >> Sorry about that, I probably should have been reviewing this series sooner. > > Hans, any suggestions regarding the UVCs GET_CUR, GET_DEF, GET_MIN/MAX > requests handling? > Support for current value and default value is already present in the control framework (V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_CUR_VAL and V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL). MIN/MAX support would have to be added by creating V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_MIN/MAX_VAL defines and implementing this in the control framework, pretty much along the same lines as the DEF_VAL support. Should be quite easy. Regards, Hans