| Message ID | 20210608162551.3010533-1-trix@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | fpga: reorganize to subdirs | expand |
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:25:51AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > It is not necessary to have a xilinx- prefix on a file > when the file is in a xilinx/ subdir. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile | 4 ++-- > drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} | 0 > drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} | 0 > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} (100%) > rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} (100%) > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > index 7bb7543412790..4ac727d03e140 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > -obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += xilinx-pr-decoupler.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += pr-decoupler.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += spi.o You just renamed the module to be called "spi.ko"???? Did you test this thing? You can not rename modules without good reasons, and calling a device specific kernel module "spi.ko" is not ok. greg k-h
On 6/9/21 2:59 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:25:51AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >> >> It is not necessary to have a xilinx- prefix on a file >> when the file is in a xilinx/ subdir. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile | 4 ++-- >> drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} | 0 >> drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} | 0 >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} (100%) >> rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} (100%) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile >> index 7bb7543412790..4ac727d03e140 100644 >> --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> >> -obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += xilinx-pr-decoupler.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += pr-decoupler.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += spi.o > You just renamed the module to be called "spi.ko"???? > > Did you test this thing? You can not rename modules without good > reasons, and calling a device specific kernel module "spi.ko" is not ok. yes, this is a problem, I will drop the renaming patches. Tom > greg k-h >
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:27:05AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 6/9/21 2:59 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:25:51AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: > > > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > > > > > It is not necessary to have a xilinx- prefix on a file > > > when the file is in a xilinx/ subdir. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile | 4 ++-- > > > drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} | 0 > > > drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} | 0 > > > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-pr-decoupler.c => pr-decoupler.c} (100%) > > > rename drivers/fpga/xilinx/{xilinx-spi.c => spi.c} (100%) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > > > index 7bb7543412790..4ac727d03e140 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile > > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += xilinx-pr-decoupler.o > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += pr-decoupler.o > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += spi.o > > You just renamed the module to be called "spi.ko"???? > > > > Did you test this thing? You can not rename modules without good > > reasons, and calling a device specific kernel module "spi.ko" is not ok. > > yes, this is a problem, I will drop the renaming patches. So you didn't test these? Again, why is this file movement necessary?
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile index 7bb7543412790..4ac727d03e140 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += xilinx-pr-decoupler.o -obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o +obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_PR_DECOUPLER) += pr-decoupler.o +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += spi.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQ_FPGA) += zynq-fpga.o obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQMP_FPGA) += zynqmp-fpga.o diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/pr-decoupler.c similarity index 100% rename from drivers/fpga/xilinx/xilinx-pr-decoupler.c rename to drivers/fpga/xilinx/pr-decoupler.c diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx/xilinx-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx/spi.c similarity index 100% rename from drivers/fpga/xilinx/xilinx-spi.c rename to drivers/fpga/xilinx/spi.c