Message ID | 20210611152659.2142983-8-tientzu@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Restricted DMA | expand |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Regardless of swiotlb setting, the restricted DMA pool is preferred if > available. > > The restricted DMA pools provide a basic level of protection against the > DMA overwriting buffer contents at unexpected times. However, to protect > against general data leakage and system memory corruption, the system > needs to provide a way to lock down the memory access, e.g., MPU. > > Note that is_dev_swiotlb_force doesn't check if > swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE. Otherwise the memory allocation behavior > with default swiotlb will be changed by the following patche > ("dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available"). > > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org> > --- > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 10 +++++++++- > kernel/dma/direct.c | 3 ++- > kernel/dma/direct.h | 3 ++- > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > index 06cf17a80f5c..8200c100fe10 100644 > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force; > * unmap calls. > * @debugfs: The dentry to debugfs. > * @late_alloc: %true if allocated using the page allocator > + * @force_swiotlb: %true if swiotlb is forced > */ > struct io_tlb_mem { > phys_addr_t start; > @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct io_tlb_mem { > spinlock_t lock; > struct dentry *debugfs; > bool late_alloc; > + bool force_swiotlb; > struct io_tlb_slot { > phys_addr_t orig_addr; > size_t alloc_size; > @@ -115,6 +117,11 @@ static inline void swiotlb_set_io_tlb_default_mem(struct device *dev) > dev->dma_io_tlb_mem = io_tlb_default_mem; > } > > +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) > +{ > + return dev->dma_io_tlb_mem->force_swiotlb; > +} > + > void __init swiotlb_exit(void); > unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void); > size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev); > @@ -126,8 +133,9 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr) > { > return false; > } > -static inline void swiotlb_set_io_tlb_default_mem(struct device *dev) > +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) > { > + return false; > } > static inline void swiotlb_exit(void) > { > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c > index 7a88c34d0867..078f7087e466 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c > @@ -496,7 +496,8 @@ size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) > { > /* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */ > if (is_swiotlb_active(dev) && > - (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) > + (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE || > + is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev))) I think we can remove the extra swiotlb_force check here if the swiotlb_force setting is propagated into io_tlb_default_mem->force when that is initialized. This avoids an extra check in the fast path. > - if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) > + if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) || > + is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev)) Same here.
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h index 06cf17a80f5c..8200c100fe10 100644 --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force; * unmap calls. * @debugfs: The dentry to debugfs. * @late_alloc: %true if allocated using the page allocator + * @force_swiotlb: %true if swiotlb is forced */ struct io_tlb_mem { phys_addr_t start; @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct io_tlb_mem { spinlock_t lock; struct dentry *debugfs; bool late_alloc; + bool force_swiotlb; struct io_tlb_slot { phys_addr_t orig_addr; size_t alloc_size; @@ -115,6 +117,11 @@ static inline void swiotlb_set_io_tlb_default_mem(struct device *dev) dev->dma_io_tlb_mem = io_tlb_default_mem; } +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) +{ + return dev->dma_io_tlb_mem->force_swiotlb; +} + void __init swiotlb_exit(void); unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void); size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev); @@ -126,8 +133,9 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr) { return false; } -static inline void swiotlb_set_io_tlb_default_mem(struct device *dev) +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) { + return false; } static inline void swiotlb_exit(void) { diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c index 7a88c34d0867..078f7087e466 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c @@ -496,7 +496,8 @@ size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) { /* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */ if (is_swiotlb_active(dev) && - (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) + (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE || + is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev))) return swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev); return SIZE_MAX; } diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h index 13e9e7158d94..f94813674e23 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/direct.h +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset; dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys); - if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) + if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) || + is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev)) return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs); if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true))) { diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index 21e99907edd6..e5ccc198d0a7 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -714,6 +714,7 @@ static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem, return -ENOMEM; swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, rmem->base, nslabs, false, true); + mem->force_swiotlb = true; rmem->priv = mem;
Regardless of swiotlb setting, the restricted DMA pool is preferred if available. The restricted DMA pools provide a basic level of protection against the DMA overwriting buffer contents at unexpected times. However, to protect against general data leakage and system memory corruption, the system needs to provide a way to lock down the memory access, e.g., MPU. Note that is_dev_swiotlb_force doesn't check if swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE. Otherwise the memory allocation behavior with default swiotlb will be changed by the following patche ("dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available"). Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org> --- include/linux/swiotlb.h | 10 +++++++++- kernel/dma/direct.c | 3 ++- kernel/dma/direct.h | 3 ++- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)