diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,37/69] KVM: x86: Check for pending APICv interrupt in kvm_vcpu_has_events()

Message ID 489df8a1b8fb43677c2c2c5347398ce985713577.1625186503.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: X86: TDX support | expand

Commit Message

Isaku Yamahata July 2, 2021, 10:04 p.m. UTC 
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

Return true for kvm_vcpu_has_events() if the vCPU has a pending APICv
interrupt to support TDX's usage of APICv.  Unlike VMX, TDX doesn't have
access to vmcs.GUEST_INTR_STATUS and so can't emulate posted interrupts,
i.e. needs to generate a posted interrupt and more importantly can't
manually move requested interrupts into the vIRR (which it also doesn't
have access to).

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Paolo Bonzini July 6, 2021, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 03/07/21 00:04, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> 
> Return true for kvm_vcpu_has_events() if the vCPU has a pending APICv
> interrupt to support TDX's usage of APICv.  Unlike VMX, TDX doesn't have
> access to vmcs.GUEST_INTR_STATUS and so can't emulate posted interrupts,
> i.e. needs to generate a posted interrupt and more importantly can't
> manually move requested interrupts into the vIRR (which it also doesn't
> have access to).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index f1d5e0a53640..92d5a6649a21 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -11341,7 +11341,9 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   	if (kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
>   	    (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) ||
> -	    kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu)))
> +	     kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu) ||
> +	     (vcpu->arch.apicv_active &&
> +	      kvm_x86_ops.dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(vcpu))))
>   		return true;
>   
>   	if (kvm_hv_has_stimer_pending(vcpu))
> 

Please remove "dy_" from the name of the callback, and use the static 
call.  Also, if it makes sense, please consider using the same test as 
for patch 38 to choose *between* either kvm_cpu_has_interrupt() + 
kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt() or 
kvm_x86_ops.dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt().

Paolo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index f1d5e0a53640..92d5a6649a21 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -11341,7 +11341,9 @@  static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
 	    (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) ||
-	    kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu)))
+	     kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu) ||
+	     (vcpu->arch.apicv_active &&
+	      kvm_x86_ops.dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(vcpu))))
 		return true;
 
 	if (kvm_hv_has_stimer_pending(vcpu))