[v2,0/1] generic/{453,454}: Do NOT run for FSs restricting names

Message

Pavel Reichl July 7, 2021, 10:32 p.m. UTC

Hello,

this is a quick attempt to finish what was discussed in thread:
	generic/453: Exclude filenames that are not supported by exfat
	https://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg16328.html

Based on Darrick's comments:

"""
TBH I think these tests (g/453 and g/454) are probably only useful for
filesystems that allow unrestricted byte streams for names.
"""

and_require_names_are_bytes()

"""
Nowadays with wider testing of other filesystems (thanks, Red Hat!) we
should hide these behind _require_names_are_bytes or move them to
tests/xfs/.
"""

Changes in V2:
* Added description for _require_names_are_bytes()
* Added _require_names_are_bytes() to g/454 as well
* fixed typo s/now/not/

Pavel Reichl (1):
  generic/{453,454}: Don't run for FSs restricting names

 common/rc         | 13 +++++++++++++
 tests/generic/453 |  1 +
 tests/generic/454 |  1 +
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

Comments

Pavel Reichl July 8, 2021, 4:36 p.m. UTC | #1

Hello, please ignore this revision as there's already revision #3 on the 
list. Thanks.