| Message ID | 20210804070851.97834-3-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | BPF iterator for UNIX domain socket. | expand |
On 8/4/21 12:08 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > If there are no abstract sockets, this prog can output the same result > compared to /proc/net/unix. > > # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix | head -n 2 > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > # cat /proc/net/unix | head -n 2 > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > According to the analysis by Yonghong Song (See the link), the BPF verifier > cannot load the code in the comment to print the name of the abstract UNIX > domain socket due to LLVM optimisation. It can be uncommented once the > LLVM code gen is improved. I have pushed the llvm fix to llvm14 trunk (https://reviews.llvm.org/D107483), and filed a request to backport to llvm13 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51363), could you in the next revision uncomment the "for" loop code and tested it with latest llvm trunk compiler? Please also add an entry in selftests/bpf/README.rst to mention the llvm commit https://reviews.llvm.org/D107483 is needed for bpf_iter unix_socket selftest, otherwise, they will see an error like ... > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> > --- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 16 ++++ > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 8 ++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h | 4 + > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c > index 1f1aade56504..77ac24b191d4 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include "bpf_iter_tcp6.skel.h" > #include "bpf_iter_udp4.skel.h" > #include "bpf_iter_udp6.skel.h" > +#include "bpf_iter_unix.skel.h" > #include "bpf_iter_test_kern1.skel.h" > #include "bpf_iter_test_kern2.skel.h" > #include "bpf_iter_test_kern3.skel.h" > @@ -313,6 +314,19 @@ static void test_udp6(void) > bpf_iter_udp6__destroy(skel); > } > > +static void test_unix(void) > +{ > + struct bpf_iter_unix *skel; > + > + skel = bpf_iter_unix__open_and_load(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_unix__open_and_load")) > + return; > + > + do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_unix); > + > + bpf_iter_unix__destroy(skel); > +} > + [...] > + if (unix_sk->addr) { > + if (!UNIX_ABSTRACT(unix_sk)) { > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " %s", unix_sk->addr->name->sun_path); > + } else { > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " @"); > + > + /* The name of the abstract UNIX domain socket starts > + * with '\0' and can contain '\0'. The null bytes > + * should be escaped as done in unix_seq_show(). > + * However, the BPF verifier cannot load the code below > + * because of the optimisation by LLVM. So, print only > + * the first escaped byte here for now. Once LLVM code > + * gen is improved, remove the BPF_SEQ_PRINTF() above > + * and uncomment the code below. > + * > + * int i, len; > + * > + * len = unix_sk->addr->len - sizeof(short); > + * > + * BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " @"); > + * > + * // unix_mkname() tests this upper bound. > + * if (len < sizeof(struct sockaddr_un)) > + * for (i = 1 ; i < len; i++) > + * BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%c", > + * unix_sk->addr->name->sun_path[i] ?: > + * '@'); > + */ > + } > + } > + [...]
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:59:40 -0700 > On 8/4/21 12:08 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > If there are no abstract sockets, this prog can output the same result > > compared to /proc/net/unix. > > > > # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix | head -n 2 > > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > > > # cat /proc/net/unix | head -n 2 > > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > > > According to the analysis by Yonghong Song (See the link), the BPF verifier > > cannot load the code in the comment to print the name of the abstract UNIX > > domain socket due to LLVM optimisation. It can be uncommented once the > > LLVM code gen is improved. > > I have pushed the llvm fix to llvm14 trunk > (https://reviews.llvm.org/D107483), and filed a request to backport to > llvm13 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51363), could you in the > next revision uncomment the "for" loop code and tested it with latest > llvm trunk compiler? Please also add an entry in selftests/bpf/README.rst > to mention the llvm commit https://reviews.llvm.org/D107483 is needed > for bpf_iter unix_socket selftest, otherwise, they will see an error > like ... Thank you for nice fixing so quickly! I confirmed that the uncommented code can be loaded properly with the latest LLVM master tree. :) ---8<--- $ sudo ./test_progs -t iter ... #7/14 unix:OK ... $ clang --version clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8a557d8311593627efd08d03178889971d5ae02b) ... $ llvm-objdump -S bpf_iter_unix.o ... ; for (i = 1 ; i < len; i++) 110: 07 09 00 00 01 00 00 00 r9 += 1 111: ad 89 09 00 00 00 00 00 if r9 < r8 goto +9 <LBB0_18> ---8<--- In the next revision, I'll uncomment the code and add a note in README.rst about your fix.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 12:09 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> wrote: > > If there are no abstract sockets, this prog can output the same result > compared to /proc/net/unix. > > # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix | head -n 2 > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > # cat /proc/net/unix | head -n 2 > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > According to the analysis by Yonghong Song (See the link), the BPF verifier > cannot load the code in the comment to print the name of the abstract UNIX > domain socket due to LLVM optimisation. It can be uncommented once the > LLVM code gen is improved. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ Our patchworks tooling, used to apply patches, is using Link: tag to record original discussion, so this will be quite confusing if you use the same "Link: " for referencing relevant discussions. Please use standard link reference syntax: According to the analysis by Yonghong Song ([0]), ... ... [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> > --- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 16 ++++ > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 8 ++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h | 4 + > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c > [...] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > index 3d83b185c4bc..d92648621bcb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #define tcp6_sock tcp6_sock___not_used > #define bpf_iter__udp bpf_iter__udp___not_used > #define udp6_sock udp6_sock___not_used > +#define bpf_iter__unix bpf_iter__unix___not_used > #define bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem___not_used > #define bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map___not_used > #define bpf_iter__sockmap bpf_iter__sockmap___not_used > @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ > #undef tcp6_sock > #undef bpf_iter__udp > #undef udp6_sock > +#undef bpf_iter__unix > #undef bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem > #undef bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map > #undef bpf_iter__sockmap > @@ -103,6 +105,12 @@ struct udp6_sock { > struct ipv6_pinfo inet6; > } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); > > +struct bpf_iter__unix { > + struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; > + struct unix_sock *unix_sk; > + uid_t uid __attribute__((aligned(8))); just fyi, aligned doesn't matter here, CO-RE will relocate offsets appropriately anyways > +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); > + > struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem { > struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; > struct bpf_map *map; [...] > +SEC("iter/unix") > +int dump_unix(struct bpf_iter__unix *ctx) > +{ > + struct unix_sock *unix_sk = ctx->unix_sk; > + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)unix_sk; > + struct seq_file *seq; > + __u32 seq_num; > + > + if (!unix_sk) > + return 0; > + > + seq = ctx->meta->seq; > + seq_num = ctx->meta->seq_num; > + if (seq_num == 0) > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "Num RefCount Protocol Flags " > + "Type St Inode Path\n"); nit: please keep format strings on a single line > + > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK: %08X %08X %08X %04X %02X %5lu", > + unix_sk, > + sk->sk_refcnt.refs.counter, > + 0, > + sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN ? __SO_ACCEPTCON : 0, > + sk->sk_type, > + sk->sk_socket ? > + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTED : SS_UNCONNECTED) : > + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTING : SS_DISCONNECTING), > + sock_i_ino(sk)); > + [...]
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:33:22 -0700 > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 12:09 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> wrote: > > > > If there are no abstract sockets, this prog can output the same result > > compared to /proc/net/unix. > > > > # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix | head -n 2 > > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > > > # cat /proc/net/unix | head -n 2 > > Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path > > ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer > > > > According to the analysis by Yonghong Song (See the link), the BPF verifier > > cannot load the code in the comment to print the name of the abstract UNIX > > domain socket due to LLVM optimisation. It can be uncommented once the > > LLVM code gen is improved. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ > > Our patchworks tooling, used to apply patches, is using Link: tag to > record original discussion, so this will be quite confusing if you use > the same "Link: " for referencing relevant discussions. Please use > standard link reference syntax: > > According to the analysis by Yonghong Song ([0]), ... > > ... > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ I'll use this format. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> > > --- > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 16 ++++ > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 8 ++ > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h | 4 + > > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c > > > > [...] > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > > index 3d83b185c4bc..d92648621bcb 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > > #define tcp6_sock tcp6_sock___not_used > > #define bpf_iter__udp bpf_iter__udp___not_used > > #define udp6_sock udp6_sock___not_used > > +#define bpf_iter__unix bpf_iter__unix___not_used > > #define bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem___not_used > > #define bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map___not_used > > #define bpf_iter__sockmap bpf_iter__sockmap___not_used > > @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ > > #undef tcp6_sock > > #undef bpf_iter__udp > > #undef udp6_sock > > +#undef bpf_iter__unix > > #undef bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem > > #undef bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map > > #undef bpf_iter__sockmap > > @@ -103,6 +105,12 @@ struct udp6_sock { > > struct ipv6_pinfo inet6; > > } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); > > > > +struct bpf_iter__unix { > > + struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; > > + struct unix_sock *unix_sk; > > + uid_t uid __attribute__((aligned(8))); > > just fyi, aligned doesn't matter here, CO-RE will relocate offsets > appropriately anyways Thank you, I'll remove it. > > > +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); > > + > > struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem { > > struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; > > struct bpf_map *map; > > [...] > > > +SEC("iter/unix") > > +int dump_unix(struct bpf_iter__unix *ctx) > > +{ > > + struct unix_sock *unix_sk = ctx->unix_sk; > > + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)unix_sk; > > + struct seq_file *seq; > > + __u32 seq_num; > > + > > + if (!unix_sk) > > + return 0; > > + > > + seq = ctx->meta->seq; > > + seq_num = ctx->meta->seq_num; > > + if (seq_num == 0) > > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "Num RefCount Protocol Flags " > > + "Type St Inode Path\n"); > > nit: please keep format strings on a single line I'll fix it. Thanks for review. > > > + > > + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK: %08X %08X %08X %04X %02X %5lu", > > + unix_sk, > > + sk->sk_refcnt.refs.counter, > > + 0, > > + sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN ? __SO_ACCEPTCON : 0, > > + sk->sk_type, > > + sk->sk_socket ? > > + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTED : SS_UNCONNECTED) : > > + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTING : SS_DISCONNECTING), > > + sock_i_ino(sk)); > > + > > [...]
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c index 1f1aade56504..77ac24b191d4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include "bpf_iter_tcp6.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_udp4.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_udp6.skel.h" +#include "bpf_iter_unix.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_test_kern1.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_test_kern2.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_test_kern3.skel.h" @@ -313,6 +314,19 @@ static void test_udp6(void) bpf_iter_udp6__destroy(skel); } +static void test_unix(void) +{ + struct bpf_iter_unix *skel; + + skel = bpf_iter_unix__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_unix__open_and_load")) + return; + + do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_unix); + + bpf_iter_unix__destroy(skel); +} + /* The expected string is less than 16 bytes */ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected, bool read_one_char) @@ -1255,6 +1269,8 @@ void test_bpf_iter(void) test_udp4(); if (test__start_subtest("udp6")) test_udp6(); + if (test__start_subtest("unix")) + test_unix(); if (test__start_subtest("anon")) test_anon_iter(false); if (test__start_subtest("anon-read-one-char")) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h index 3d83b185c4bc..d92648621bcb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #define tcp6_sock tcp6_sock___not_used #define bpf_iter__udp bpf_iter__udp___not_used #define udp6_sock udp6_sock___not_used +#define bpf_iter__unix bpf_iter__unix___not_used #define bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem___not_used #define bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map___not_used #define bpf_iter__sockmap bpf_iter__sockmap___not_used @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ #undef tcp6_sock #undef bpf_iter__udp #undef udp6_sock +#undef bpf_iter__unix #undef bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem #undef bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map #undef bpf_iter__sockmap @@ -103,6 +105,12 @@ struct udp6_sock { struct ipv6_pinfo inet6; } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); +struct bpf_iter__unix { + struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; + struct unix_sock *unix_sk; + uid_t uid __attribute__((aligned(8))); +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); + struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem { struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; struct bpf_map *map; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..048844ee4f32 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright Amazon.com Inc. or its affiliates. */ +#include "bpf_iter.h" +#include "bpf_tracing_net.h" +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h> + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +static long sock_i_ino(const struct sock *sk) +{ + const struct socket *sk_socket = sk->sk_socket; + const struct inode *inode; + unsigned long ino; + + if (!sk_socket) + return 0; + + inode = &container_of(sk_socket, struct socket_alloc, socket)->vfs_inode; + bpf_probe_read_kernel(&ino, sizeof(ino), &inode->i_ino); + return ino; +} + +SEC("iter/unix") +int dump_unix(struct bpf_iter__unix *ctx) +{ + struct unix_sock *unix_sk = ctx->unix_sk; + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)unix_sk; + struct seq_file *seq; + __u32 seq_num; + + if (!unix_sk) + return 0; + + seq = ctx->meta->seq; + seq_num = ctx->meta->seq_num; + if (seq_num == 0) + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "Num RefCount Protocol Flags " + "Type St Inode Path\n"); + + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK: %08X %08X %08X %04X %02X %5lu", + unix_sk, + sk->sk_refcnt.refs.counter, + 0, + sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN ? __SO_ACCEPTCON : 0, + sk->sk_type, + sk->sk_socket ? + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTED : SS_UNCONNECTED) : + (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? SS_CONNECTING : SS_DISCONNECTING), + sock_i_ino(sk)); + + if (unix_sk->addr) { + if (!UNIX_ABSTRACT(unix_sk)) { + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " %s", unix_sk->addr->name->sun_path); + } else { + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " @"); + + /* The name of the abstract UNIX domain socket starts + * with '\0' and can contain '\0'. The null bytes + * should be escaped as done in unix_seq_show(). + * However, the BPF verifier cannot load the code below + * because of the optimisation by LLVM. So, print only + * the first escaped byte here for now. Once LLVM code + * gen is improved, remove the BPF_SEQ_PRINTF() above + * and uncomment the code below. + * + * int i, len; + * + * len = unix_sk->addr->len - sizeof(short); + * + * BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, " @"); + * + * // unix_mkname() tests this upper bound. + * if (len < sizeof(struct sockaddr_un)) + * for (i = 1 ; i < len; i++) + * BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%c", + * unix_sk->addr->name->sun_path[i] ?: + * '@'); + */ + } + } + + BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "\n"); + + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h index 3af0998a0623..eef5646ddb19 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ #define AF_INET 2 #define AF_INET6 10 +#define __SO_ACCEPTCON (1 << 16) +#define UNIX_HASH_SIZE 256 +#define UNIX_ABSTRACT(unix_sk) (unix_sk->addr->hash < UNIX_HASH_SIZE) + #define SOL_TCP 6 #define TCP_CONGESTION 13 #define TCP_CA_NAME_MAX 16
If there are no abstract sockets, this prog can output the same result compared to /proc/net/unix. # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix | head -n 2 Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer # cat /proc/net/unix | head -n 2 Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path ffff9ab7122db000: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 10623 private/defer According to the analysis by Yonghong Song (See the link), the BPF verifier cannot load the code in the comment to print the name of the abstract UNIX domain socket due to LLVM optimisation. It can be uncommented once the LLVM code gen is improved. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1994df05-8f01-371f-3c3b-d33d7836878c@fb.com/ Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 16 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 8 ++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_tracing_net.h | 4 + 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_unix.c