Message ID | 83e4a62108eec470ac0b3f2510b982794d2b7989.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function | expand |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(), > so remove the implementation. > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> > --- > include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@ > > #include <asm/mem_encrypt.h> > > -#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ > - > -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; } > - > #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT > -- This one wants to be part of the previous patch.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This one wants to be part of the previous patch.
... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a
single atomic :) replacement and that's it.
On 8/17/21 5:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> This one wants to be part of the previous patch. > > ... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a > single atomic :) replacement and that's it. Ok, I'll squash those all together. Thanks, Tom >
diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644 --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@ #include <asm/mem_encrypt.h> -#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ - -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; } - #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT