Message ID | 20210823104618.14552-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND,v3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory() | expand |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:46:18AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The memory attributes attached to memory regions depend on architecture > specific mappings. > > For some memory regions, the attributes specified by firmware (eg > uncached) are not sufficient to determine how a memory region should be > mapped by an OS (for instance a region that is define as uncached in > firmware can be mapped as Normal or Device memory on arm64) and > therefore the OS must be given control on how to map the region to match > the expected mapping behaviour (eg if a mapping is requested with memory > semantics, it must allow unaligned accesses). > > Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_ioremap() back-end to split > them into two separate code paths: > > acpi_os_memmap() -> memory semantics > acpi_os_ioremap() -> MMIO semantics > > The split allows the architectural implementation back-ends to detect > the default memory attributes required by the mapping in question > (ie the mapping API defines the semantics memory vs MMIO) and map the > memory accordingly. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/31ffe8fc-f5ee-2858-26c5-0fd8bdd68702@arm.com > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > --- > Resending with all lists CC'ed. > > Patch series is a v3 of a previous version[2]: > > v2->v3: > - Dropped first two-patches following LKML feedback[2] > v1->v2 > - Added patch 1 and 2 according to feedback received on[1] > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210726100026.12538-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210802152359.12623-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > > arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 8 ++++++++ > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) For arm64: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> I presume this patch would go in via the acpi tree.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:31 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:46:18AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > The memory attributes attached to memory regions depend on architecture > > specific mappings. > > > > For some memory regions, the attributes specified by firmware (eg > > uncached) are not sufficient to determine how a memory region should be > > mapped by an OS (for instance a region that is define as uncached in > > firmware can be mapped as Normal or Device memory on arm64) and > > therefore the OS must be given control on how to map the region to match > > the expected mapping behaviour (eg if a mapping is requested with memory > > semantics, it must allow unaligned accesses). > > > > Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_ioremap() back-end to split > > them into two separate code paths: > > > > acpi_os_memmap() -> memory semantics > > acpi_os_ioremap() -> MMIO semantics > > > > The split allows the architectural implementation back-ends to detect > > the default memory attributes required by the mapping in question > > (ie the mapping API defines the semantics memory vs MMIO) and map the > > memory accordingly. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/31ffe8fc-f5ee-2858-26c5-0fd8bdd68702@arm.com > > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > > Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > > --- > > Resending with all lists CC'ed. > > > > Patch series is a v3 of a previous version[2]: > > > > v2->v3: > > - Dropped first two-patches following LKML feedback[2] > > v1->v2 > > - Added patch 1 and 2 according to feedback received on[1] > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210726100026.12538-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210802152359.12623-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 +++ > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > > include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 8 ++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > For arm64: > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > > I presume this patch would go in via the acpi tree. Applied as 5.15 material, thanks!
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h index bd68e1b7f29f..7535dc7cc5aa 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr); void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); #define acpi_os_ioremap acpi_os_ioremap +void __iomem *acpi_os_memmap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size); +#define acpi_os_memmap acpi_os_memmap + typedef u64 phys_cpuid_t; #define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID INVALID_HWID diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index f3851724fe35..1c9c2f7a1c04 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) return __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); } -void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +static void __iomem *__acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, + acpi_size size, bool memory) { efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; pgprot_t prot; @@ -299,9 +300,11 @@ void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to - * the EFI runtime services. + * the EFI runtime services. Determine the region default + * attributes by checking the requested memory semantics. */ - prot = __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); + prot = memory ? __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_NC) : + __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE); if (region) { switch (region->type) { case EFI_LOADER_CODE: @@ -361,6 +364,16 @@ void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) return __ioremap(phys, size, prot); } +void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +{ + return __acpi_os_ioremap(phys, size, false); +} + +void __iomem *acpi_os_memmap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +{ + return __acpi_os_ioremap(phys, size, true); +} + /* * Claim Synchronous External Aborts as a firmware first notification. * diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index 45c5c0e45e33..a43f1521efe6 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c @@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ acpi_map_lookup_virt(void __iomem *virt, acpi_size size) #define should_use_kmap(pfn) page_is_ram(pfn) #endif -static void __iomem *acpi_map(acpi_physical_address pg_off, unsigned long pg_sz) +static void __iomem *acpi_map(acpi_physical_address pg_off, unsigned long pg_sz, + bool memory) { unsigned long pfn; @@ -294,7 +295,8 @@ static void __iomem *acpi_map(acpi_physical_address pg_off, unsigned long pg_sz) return NULL; return (void __iomem __force *)kmap(pfn_to_page(pfn)); } else - return acpi_os_ioremap(pg_off, pg_sz); + return memory ? acpi_os_memmap(pg_off, pg_sz) : + acpi_os_ioremap(pg_off, pg_sz); } static void acpi_unmap(acpi_physical_address pg_off, void __iomem *vaddr) @@ -309,9 +311,10 @@ static void acpi_unmap(acpi_physical_address pg_off, void __iomem *vaddr) } /** - * acpi_os_map_iomem - Get a virtual address for a given physical address range. + * __acpi_os_map_iomem - Get a virtual address for a given physical address range. * @phys: Start of the physical address range to map. * @size: Size of the physical address range to map. + * @memory: true if remapping memory, false if IO * * Look up the given physical address range in the list of existing ACPI memory * mappings. If found, get a reference to it and return a pointer to it (its @@ -321,8 +324,8 @@ static void acpi_unmap(acpi_physical_address pg_off, void __iomem *vaddr) * During early init (when acpi_permanent_mmap has not been set yet) this * routine simply calls __acpi_map_table() to get the job done. */ -void __iomem __ref -*acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +static void __iomem __ref +*__acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size, bool memory) { struct acpi_ioremap *map; void __iomem *virt; @@ -353,7 +356,7 @@ void __iomem __ref pg_off = round_down(phys, PAGE_SIZE); pg_sz = round_up(phys + size, PAGE_SIZE) - pg_off; - virt = acpi_map(phys, size); + virt = acpi_map(phys, size, memory); if (!virt) { mutex_unlock(&acpi_ioremap_lock); kfree(map); @@ -372,11 +375,17 @@ void __iomem __ref mutex_unlock(&acpi_ioremap_lock); return map->virt + (phys - map->phys); } + +void __iomem *__ref +acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) +{ + return __acpi_os_map_iomem(phys, size, false); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_os_map_iomem); void *__ref acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) { - return (void *)acpi_os_map_iomem(phys, size); + return (void *)__acpi_os_map_iomem(phys, size, true); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_os_map_memory); diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h index 027faa8883aa..a0212e67d6f4 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h @@ -14,6 +14,14 @@ static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, } #endif +#ifndef acpi_os_memmap +static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_memmap(acpi_physical_address phys, + acpi_size size) +{ + return ioremap_cache(phys, size); +} +#endif + extern bool acpi_permanent_mmap; void __iomem __ref