Message ID | s5hilz8n1an.wl-tiwai@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code | expand |
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=544853 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch FAIL 0.46 seconds GitLint PASS 0.10 seconds BuildKernel PASS 512.47 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 338.44 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 2.68 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 1.86 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester FAIL 31.33 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 2.06 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 2.08 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 2.13 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 1.98 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.46 seconds Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code WARNING: Unknown commit id '27c24fda62b6', maybe rebased or not pulled? #9: change in the commit 27c24fda62b6 ("Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 35 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. "[PATCH] Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code" has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. ############################## Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.10 seconds Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint ############################## Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 512.47 seconds Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth ############################## Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 338.44 seconds Setup environment for running Test Runner ############################## Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.68 seconds Run test-runner with l2cap-tester Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 1.86 seconds Run test-runner with bnep-tester Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - FAIL - 31.33 seconds Run test-runner with mgmt-tester Total: 452, Passed: 451 (99.8%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Read Exp Feature - Success Failed 0.020 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.06 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.08 seconds Run test-runner with sco-tester Total: 11, Passed: 11 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.13 seconds Run test-runner with smp-tester Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 1.98 seconds Run test-runner with userchan-tester Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
--- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c @@ -1118,18 +1118,22 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn) return; } + sock_hold(parent); + sco_conn_unlock(conn); + lock_sock(parent); sk = sco_sock_alloc(sock_net(parent), NULL, BTPROTO_SCO, GFP_ATOMIC, 0); if (!sk) { release_sock(parent); - sco_conn_unlock(conn); + sock_put(parent); return; } sco_sock_init(sk, parent); + sco_conn_lock(conn); bacpy(&sco_pi(sk)->src, &conn->hcon->src); bacpy(&sco_pi(sk)->dst, &conn->hcon->dst); @@ -1143,10 +1147,10 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn) /* Wake up parent */ parent->sk_data_ready(parent); + sco_conn_unlock(conn); release_sock(parent); - - sco_conn_unlock(conn); + sock_put(parent); } }