diff mbox series

Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code

Message ID s5hilz8n1an.wl-tiwai@suse.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code | expand

Commit Message

Takashi Iwai Sept. 10, 2021, 11 a.m. UTC
Hi,

while investigation of the recent BT fixes, Nicolai found out that the
change in the commit 27c24fda62b6 ("Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in
SCO") may cause a sleep-in-atomic.

The commit replaced bh_lock_sock() with lock_sock(), which can sleep.
Meanwhile, in sco_conn_ready(), this is called after sco_conn_lock(),
and sco_conn_lock() is a simple spinlock.  So this may lead to a
sleep-in-atomic.

I can imagine a fix like the below, but this also made us wonder
whether the sco_conn_lock() would be needed at all.  In the code path,
conn->hcon won't be changed, right?


thanks,

Takashi

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com Sept. 10, 2021, 11:56 a.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=544853

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      0.46 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.10 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      512.47 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      338.44 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      2.68 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      1.86 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       FAIL      31.33 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      2.06 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      2.08 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      2.13 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      1.98 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.46 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code
WARNING: Unknown commit id '27c24fda62b6', maybe rebased or not pulled?
#9: 
change in the commit 27c24fda62b6 ("Bluetooth: switch to lock_sock in

ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)

total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 35 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

"[PATCH] Possible sleep-in-atomic in BT SCO code" has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


##############################
Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.10 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint


##############################
Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 512.47 seconds
Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth


##############################
Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 338.44 seconds
Setup environment for running Test Runner


##############################
Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.68 seconds
Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 1.86 seconds
Run test-runner with bnep-tester
Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - FAIL - 31.33 seconds
Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
Total: 452, Passed: 451 (99.8%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success                           Failed       0.020 seconds

##############################
Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.06 seconds
Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.08 seconds
Run test-runner with sco-tester
Total: 11, Passed: 11 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.13 seconds
Run test-runner with smp-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 1.98 seconds
Run test-runner with userchan-tester
Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c
@@ -1118,18 +1118,22 @@  static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
 			return;
 		}
 
+		sock_hold(parent);
+		sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+
 		lock_sock(parent);
 
 		sk = sco_sock_alloc(sock_net(parent), NULL,
 				    BTPROTO_SCO, GFP_ATOMIC, 0);
 		if (!sk) {
 			release_sock(parent);
-			sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+			sock_put(parent);
 			return;
 		}
 
 		sco_sock_init(sk, parent);
 
+		sco_conn_lock(conn);
 		bacpy(&sco_pi(sk)->src, &conn->hcon->src);
 		bacpy(&sco_pi(sk)->dst, &conn->hcon->dst);
 
@@ -1143,10 +1147,10 @@  static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
 
 		/* Wake up parent */
 		parent->sk_data_ready(parent);
+		sco_conn_unlock(conn);
 
 		release_sock(parent);
-
-		sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+		sock_put(parent);
 	}
 }