[v7,bpf-next,0/3] bpf: introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot

Message

Song Liu Sept. 10, 2021, 6:33 p.m. UTC

Changes v6 => v7:
1. Improve/fix intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack() logic. (Peter).

Changes v5 => v6:
1. Add local_irq_save/restore to intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack. (Peter)
2. Remove buf and size check in bpf_get_branch_snapshot, move flags check
   to later fo the function. (Peter, Andrii)
3. Revise comments for bpf_get_branch_snapshot in bpf.h (Andrii)

Changes v4 => v5:
1. Modify perf_snapshot_branch_stack_t to save some memcpy. (Andrii)
2. Minor fixes in selftests. (Andrii)

Changes v3 => v4:
1. Do not reshuffle intel_pmu_disable_all(). Use some inline to save LBR
   entries. (Peter)
2. Move static_call(perf_snapshot_branch_stack) to the helper. (Alexei)
3. Add argument flags to bpf_get_branch_snapshot. (Andrii)
4. Make MAX_BRANCH_SNAPSHOT an enum (Andrii). And rename it as
   PERF_MAX_BRANCH_SNAPSHOT
5. Make bpf_get_branch_snapshot similar to bpf_read_branch_records.
   (Andrii)
6. Move the test target function to bpf_testmod. Updated kallsyms_find_next
   to work properly with modules. (Andrii)

Changes v2 => v3:
1. Fix the use of static_call. (Peter)
2. Limit the use to perfmon version >= 2. (Peter)
3. Modify intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack() to use intel_pmu_disable_all
   and intel_pmu_enable_all().

Changes v1 => v2:
1. Rename the helper as bpf_get_branch_snapshot;
2. Fix/simplify the use of static_call;
3. Instead of percpu variables, let intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack output
   branch records to an output argument of type perf_branch_snapshot.

Branch stack can be very useful in understanding software events. For
example, when a long function, e.g. sys_perf_event_open, returns an errno,
it is not obvious why the function failed. Branch stack could provide very
helpful information in this type of scenarios.

This set adds support to read branch stack with a new BPF helper
bpf_get_branch_trace(). Currently, this is only supported in Intel systems.
It is also possible to support the same feaure for PowerPC.

The hardware that records the branch stace is not stopped automatically on
software events. Therefore, it is necessary to stop it in software soon.
Otherwise, the hardware buffers/registers will be flushed. One of the key
design consideration in this set is to minimize the number of branch record
entries between the event triggers and the hardware recorder is stopped.
Based on this goal, current design is different from the discussions in
original RFC [1]:
 1) Static call is used when supported, to save function pointer
    dereference;
 2) intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all is used instead of perf_pmu_disable(),
    because the latter uses about 10 entries before stopping LBR.

With current code, on Intel CPU, LBR is stopped after 7 branch entries
after fexit triggers:

ID: 0 from bpf_get_branch_snapshot+18 to intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack+0
ID: 1 from __brk_limit+477143934 to bpf_get_branch_snapshot+0
ID: 2 from __brk_limit+477192263 to __brk_limit+477143880  # trampoline
ID: 3 from __bpf_prog_enter+34 to __brk_limit+477192251
ID: 4 from migrate_disable+60 to __bpf_prog_enter+9
ID: 5 from __bpf_prog_enter+4 to migrate_disable+0
ID: 6 from bpf_testmod_loop_test+20 to __bpf_prog_enter+0
ID: 7 from bpf_testmod_loop_test+20 to bpf_testmod_loop_test+13
ID: 8 from bpf_testmod_loop_test+20 to bpf_testmod_loop_test+13
...

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[e-mail]/

Song Liu (3):
  perf: enable branch record for software events
  bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_branch_snapshot
  selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot

 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c                  |  67 ++++++++++--
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c                    |   2 +-
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c                   |  20 +---
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h                  |  19 ++++
 include/linux/perf_event.h                    |  23 ++++
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  22 ++++
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |   3 +-
 kernel/events/core.c                          |   2 +
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                      |  30 ++++++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  22 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  19 +++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c     |  14 +--
 .../bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c      | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  |  39 -------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/get_branch_snapshot.c |  40 +++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c      |  39 +++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      |   2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c   |  37 +++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h   |   5 +
 19 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_branch_snapshot.c

--
2.30.2

Comments

Song Liu Sept. 10, 2021, 7:22 p.m. UTC | #1

Hi Peter, 

> On Sep 10, 2021, at 11:33 AM, Song Liu <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Changes v6 => v7:
> 1. Improve/fix intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack() logic. (Peter).

Would you mind reply with your Acked-by or Reviewed-by on v7? I will fix
the comment in the selftest in v8 or a follow-up patch. 

Thanks,
Song

[...]

Alexei Starovoitov Sept. 13, 2021, 5:59 p.m. UTC | #2

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:34 AM Song Liu <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Changes v6 => v7:
> 1. Improve/fix intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack() logic. (Peter).
>
> Branch stack can be very useful in understanding software events. For
> example, when a long function, e.g. sys_perf_event_open, returns an errno,
> it is not obvious why the function failed. Branch stack could provide very
> helpful information in this type of scenarios.
>
> This set adds support to read branch stack with a new BPF helper
> bpf_get_branch_trace(). Currently, this is only supported in Intel systems.
> It is also possible to support the same feaure for PowerPC.

Applied. Thanks