Message ID | 20210914101443.330434-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] selftest/vm: Fix ksm selftest to run with different NUMA topologies | expand |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:14 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Platforms can have non-contiguous NUMA nodes like below > > #numactl -H > available: 2 nodes (0,8) > ..... > node distances: > node 0 8 > 0: 10 40 > 8: 40 10 > > #numactl -H > available: 1 nodes (1) > .... > node distances: > node 1 > 1: 10 > > Hence update the test to not assume the presence of Node 0 and 1 > and also use numa_num_configured_nodes() instead of numa_max_node > for finding whether to skip the test. > > Cc: Zhansaya Bagdauletkyzy <zhansayabagdaulet@gmail.com> > Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> > Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> > Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> > Fixes: 82e717ad3501 ("selftests: vm: add KSM merging across nodes test") > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> > --- > Changes from v2: > * Add Fixes: line > > Changes from v1: > * Updates based on review feedback. > > tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c > index b61dcdb44c5b..73132d852513 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c > @@ -354,12 +354,34 @@ static int check_ksm_zero_page_merge(int mapping, int prot, long page_count, int > return KSFT_FAIL; > } > > +static int get_next_mem_node(int node) > +{ > + > + long node_size; > + int mem_node; Please initialize mem_node, otherwise if numa_max_node() returns 0, mem_node will be returned from this function uninitialized. With this fixed, looks good: Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c index b61dcdb44c5b..73132d852513 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c @@ -354,12 +354,34 @@ static int check_ksm_zero_page_merge(int mapping, int prot, long page_count, int return KSFT_FAIL; } +static int get_next_mem_node(int node) +{ + + long node_size; + int mem_node; + int i, max_node = numa_max_node(); + + for (i = node + 1; i <= max_node + node; i++) { + mem_node = i % (max_node + 1); + node_size = numa_node_size(mem_node, NULL); + if (node_size > 0) + break; + } + return mem_node; +} + +static int get_first_mem_node(void) +{ + return get_next_mem_node(numa_max_node()); +} + static int check_ksm_numa_merge(int mapping, int prot, int timeout, bool merge_across_nodes, size_t page_size) { void *numa1_map_ptr, *numa2_map_ptr; struct timespec start_time; int page_count = 2; + int first_node; if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &start_time)) { perror("clock_gettime"); @@ -370,7 +392,7 @@ static int check_ksm_numa_merge(int mapping, int prot, int timeout, bool merge_a perror("NUMA support not enabled"); return KSFT_SKIP; } - if (numa_max_node() < 1) { + if (numa_num_configured_nodes() <= 1) { printf("At least 2 NUMA nodes must be available\n"); return KSFT_SKIP; } @@ -378,8 +400,9 @@ static int check_ksm_numa_merge(int mapping, int prot, int timeout, bool merge_a return KSFT_FAIL; /* allocate 2 pages in 2 different NUMA nodes and fill them with the same data */ - numa1_map_ptr = numa_alloc_onnode(page_size, 0); - numa2_map_ptr = numa_alloc_onnode(page_size, 1); + first_node = get_first_mem_node(); + numa1_map_ptr = numa_alloc_onnode(page_size, first_node); + numa2_map_ptr = numa_alloc_onnode(page_size, get_next_mem_node(first_node)); if (!numa1_map_ptr || !numa2_map_ptr) { perror("numa_alloc_onnode"); return KSFT_FAIL;
Platforms can have non-contiguous NUMA nodes like below #numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0,8) ..... node distances: node 0 8 0: 10 40 8: 40 10 #numactl -H available: 1 nodes (1) .... node distances: node 1 1: 10 Hence update the test to not assume the presence of Node 0 and 1 and also use numa_num_configured_nodes() instead of numa_max_node for finding whether to skip the test. Cc: Zhansaya Bagdauletkyzy <zhansayabagdaulet@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Fixes: 82e717ad3501 ("selftests: vm: add KSM merging across nodes test") Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> --- Changes from v2: * Add Fixes: line Changes from v1: * Updates based on review feedback. tools/testing/selftests/vm/ksm_tests.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)