mbox series

[V3,0/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f|dsp: Remove

Message ID 20210917095426.19277-1-sinthu.raja@ti.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f|dsp: Remove | expand

Message

Sinthu Raja Sept. 17, 2021, 9:54 a.m. UTC
From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>

Bjorn,

The series of patches are meant to help make the rproc bindings for K3
r5f and dsp support independent of board/platform involved. The current
examples get in the way of the device tree cleanups and new platform
introductions [1].

When applying this series, it would greatly help us if you could provide
us with a immutable tag for Nishanth to merge in and help introduce the
newer platforms that are blocked by this cleanup. See [2] for further
context of why we are requesting for immutable tag.

Changes in V3:
- Added r5f cleanup as well
- Commit message, $subject and simplification of the fixup.

V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210818074030.1877-1-sinthu.raja@ti.com/
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210817152005.21575-1-sinthu.raja@ti.com/


Sinthu Raja (2):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Remove board-specific compatible from
    DT example
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-dsp: Remove board-specific compatible from
    DT example

 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml       | 4 +---
 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml       | 4 +---
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1631794913.472895.1119414.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org/ 
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210125141642.4yybjnklk3qsqjdy@steersman/

Comments

Nishanth Menon Sept. 17, 2021, 2:47 p.m. UTC | #1
oops.. cover-letter $subject is probably improved with "board-specific
compatible"?, but anyways, does'nt matter for the rest f the actual
patches..

On 15:24-20210917, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@ti.com>
> 
> Bjorn,
> 
> The series of patches are meant to help make the rproc bindings for K3
> r5f and dsp support independent of board/platform involved. The current
> examples get in the way of the device tree cleanups and new platform
> introductions [1].
> 
> When applying this series, it would greatly help us if you could provide
> us with a immutable tag for Nishanth to merge in and help introduce the
> newer platforms that are blocked by this cleanup. See [2] for further
> context of why we are requesting for immutable tag.

Yes again please. once Rob reviews the binding patches, This series is
blocking me and thanks for respinning them.

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

> 
> Changes in V3:
> - Added r5f cleanup as well
> - Commit message, $subject and simplification of the fixup.
> 
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210818074030.1877-1-sinthu.raja@ti.com/
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210817152005.21575-1-sinthu.raja@ti.com/
> 
> 
> Sinthu Raja (2):
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Remove board-specific compatible from
>     DT example
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-dsp: Remove board-specific compatible from
>     DT example
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml       | 4 +---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml       | 4 +---
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1631794913.472895.1119414.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org/ 
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210125141642.4yybjnklk3qsqjdy@steersman/
> -- 
> 2.32.0
>