mbox series

[v3,0/3] PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions

Message ID 7312660.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series PCI: PM: Simplify and unify some helper functions | expand

Message

Rafael J. Wysocki Sept. 29, 2021, 6:05 p.m. UTC
Hi All,

This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next

which should be included in linux-next.

Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI:
Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series:

 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/

and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that
series.  The rest of that series is present in the git branch above.

All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that
there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them.

Ferry, please test!

Thanks!

Comments

Ferry Toth Oct. 3, 2021, 8:14 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki:
> Hi All,
> 
> This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> 
> which should be included in linux-next.
> 
> Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI:
> Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/
> 
> and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that
> series.  The rest of that series is present in the git branch above.
> 
> All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that
> there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them.
> 
> Ferry, please test!

This is how I tested:
3 patches from 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/ 
on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before
4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git
then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the 
new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged).

In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch).

Thanks for doing this!

> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
>
Rafael J. Wysocki Oct. 5, 2021, 11:03 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 10:14 PM Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Op 29-09-2021 om 20:05 schreef Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This series is on top of the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> >
> > which should be included in linux-next.
> >
> > Two of the 3 patches in this series, [1-2/3], were included in the "PCI: ACPI:
> > Get rid of struct pci_platform_pm_ops and clean up code" series:
> >
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1800633.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher/
> >
> > and the remaining one, [3/3] is a new version of a problematic patch from that
> > series.  The rest of that series is present in the git branch above.
> >
> > All of the 3 patches in this set need to be tested in order to verify that
> > there are no more issues that need to be addressed in them.
> >
> > Ferry, please test!
>
> This is how I tested:
> 3 patches from
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/2793105.e9J7NaK4W3@kreacher/
> on top of 5.15.0-rc2 as before
> 4 patches from v2 in the order of linux-pm.git
> then tested without, with 1/3, 1+2/3, 1+2+3/3 on top (with only 3/3 the
> new patch, 1+2/3 taken from v2 as they are unchanged).
>
> In all 4 cases I didn't find any trouble (related to this patch).
>
> Thanks for doing this!

Thank you!