Message ID | 20211012101743.2282031-1-kgraul@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net/smc: introduce SMC-Rv2 support | expand |
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote: > Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree. > > SMC-Rv2 support (see https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337) > provides routable RoCE support for SMC-R, eliminating the current > same-subnet restriction, by exploiting the UDP encapsulation feature > of the RoCE adapter hardware. > > Patch 1 ("net/smc: improved fix wait on already cleared link") is > already applied on netdevs net tree but its changes are needed for > this series on net-next. The patch is unchanged compared to the > version on the net tree. This series as marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork, I think my Dave. Maybe it is because of the RoCE part, is there a reason not to CC linux-rdma on it?
On 14/10/2021 18:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote: >> Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree. >> >> SMC-Rv2 support (see https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337) >> provides routable RoCE support for SMC-R, eliminating the current >> same-subnet restriction, by exploiting the UDP encapsulation feature >> of the RoCE adapter hardware. >> >> Patch 1 ("net/smc: improved fix wait on already cleared link") is >> already applied on netdevs net tree but its changes are needed for >> this series on net-next. The patch is unchanged compared to the >> version on the net tree. > > This series as marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork, I think my Dave. > Maybe it is because of the RoCE part, is there a reason not to CC > linux-rdma on it? There is no reason for that, I was not aware that I should CC linux-rdma. I can send a v2 with an extended CC list.
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:32:37 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote: > On 14/10/2021 18:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:32 +0200 Karsten Graul wrote: > >> Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree. > >> > >> SMC-Rv2 support (see https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337) > >> provides routable RoCE support for SMC-R, eliminating the current > >> same-subnet restriction, by exploiting the UDP encapsulation feature > >> of the RoCE adapter hardware. > >> > >> Patch 1 ("net/smc: improved fix wait on already cleared link") is > >> already applied on netdevs net tree but its changes are needed for > >> this series on net-next. The patch is unchanged compared to the > >> version on the net tree. > > > > This series as marked as "Needs ACK" in patchwork, I think my Dave. > > Maybe it is because of the RoCE part, is there a reason not to CC > > linux-rdma on it? > > There is no reason for that, I was not aware that I should CC linux-rdma. > I can send a v2 with an extended CC list. Yeah, let's do that. I'm not sure what the reason for the patchwork designation was so let's repost with linux-rdma and if nobody complains we can merge tomorrow morning. Thanks!