diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,2/5] bpf: factor out helpers to check ctx access for BTF function

Message ID 20211016124806.1547989-3-houtao1@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series introduce dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: mingo@redhat.com rostedt@goodmis.org yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org songliubraving@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com davem@davemloft.net kuba@kernel.org dsahern@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 11730 this patch: 11730
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 11361 this patch: 11361
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next success VM_Test

Commit Message

Hou Tao Oct. 16, 2021, 12:48 p.m. UTC
Factor out two helpers to check the read access of ctx for BTF
function. bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access() is used to check the
read access to argument is valid, and bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access()
also checks whether the btf type of argument is valid besides
the checking of arguments read. bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access()
will be used by the following patch.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h      | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 16 ++--------------
 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c    |  9 +--------
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

Martin KaFai Lau Oct. 20, 2021, 5 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:48:03PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> Factor out two helpers to check the read access of ctx for BTF
> function. bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access() is used to check the
> read access to argument is valid, and bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access()
> also checks whether the btf type of argument is valid besides
> the checking of arguments read. bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access()
> will be used by the following patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h      | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 16 ++--------------
>  net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c    |  9 +--------
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index b7c1e2bc93f7..b503306da2ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1648,6 +1648,33 @@ bool bpf_prog_test_check_kfunc_call(u32 kfunc_id, struct module *owner);
>  bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>  		    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  		    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
> +
> +/*
> + * The maximum number of BTF function arguments is MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS.
> + * And only aligned read is allowed.
> + */
> +static inline bool bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access(int off, int size,
> +						 enum bpf_access_type type)
Refactoring makes sense but naming could be hard to figure out here.

"_btf_func_arg" part is confusing with other btf_check_func_arg
functions in btf.c.  e.g. it is checking an arg of a bpf subprog or
checking a bpf_prog's ctx here?  The name sounds former but it is actually
the latter here (i.e. checking ctx).  It is a ctx with an array
of __u64 for tracing.  How about bpf_tracing_ctx_access()?

> +{
> +	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
> +		return false;
> +	if (type != BPF_READ)
> +		return false;
> +	if (off % size != 0)
> +		return false;
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access(int off, int size,
> +						 enum bpf_access_type type,
> +						 const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +						 struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
and may be bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access() here?

> +{
> +	if (!bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access(off, size, type))
> +		return false;
> +	return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
> +}
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b7c1e2bc93f7..b503306da2ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1648,6 +1648,33 @@  bool bpf_prog_test_check_kfunc_call(u32 kfunc_id, struct module *owner);
 bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 		    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
+
+/*
+ * The maximum number of BTF function arguments is MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS.
+ * And only aligned read is allowed.
+ */
+static inline bool bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access(int off, int size,
+						 enum bpf_access_type type)
+{
+	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
+		return false;
+	if (type != BPF_READ)
+		return false;
+	if (off % size != 0)
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access(int off, int size,
+						 enum bpf_access_type type,
+						 const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+						 struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+	if (!bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access(off, size, type))
+		return false;
+	return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
+}
+
 int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 		      const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
 		      enum bpf_access_type atype,
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 6b3153841a33..f2858ef32e16 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1644,13 +1644,7 @@  static bool raw_tp_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 					const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 					struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
 {
-	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
-		return false;
-	if (type != BPF_READ)
-		return false;
-	if (off % size != 0)
-		return false;
-	return true;
+	return bpf_check_btf_func_arg_access(off, size, type);
 }
 
 static bool tracing_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
@@ -1658,13 +1652,7 @@  static bool tracing_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 					 const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 					 struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
 {
-	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
-		return false;
-	if (type != BPF_READ)
-		return false;
-	if (off % size != 0)
-		return false;
-	return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
+	return bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
 }
 
 int __weak bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 57709ac09fb2..1eccc4974382 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -81,14 +81,7 @@  static bool bpf_tcp_ca_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 				       const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				       struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
 {
-	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
-		return false;
-	if (type != BPF_READ)
-		return false;
-	if (off % size != 0)
-		return false;
-
-	if (!btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info))
+	if (!bpf_check_btf_func_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info))
 		return false;
 
 	if (info->reg_type == PTR_TO_BTF_ID && info->btf_id == sock_id)