Message ID | 20211006180908.GA913430@embeddedor (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc() | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Single patches do not need cover letters |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 6 of 6 maintainers |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 01:09:08PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead > of devm_kzalloc(). > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Similar patch state here, it seems? Who needs to Ack this? https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211006180908.GA913430@embeddedor/ Thanks!
On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 10:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 01:09:08PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead > > of devm_kzalloc(). > > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > > Similar patch state here, it seems? Who needs to Ack this? > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211006180908.GA913430@embeddedor/ It was reviewed/ack'd and recently accepted here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211019183027.2820413-10-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/ Thanks, Tony
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c index 16de603b280c..38960bcc384c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ ice_create_init_fdir_rule(struct ice_pf *pf, enum ice_fltr_ptype flow) if (!seg) return -ENOMEM; - tun_seg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg) * ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, + tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL); if (!tun_seg) { devm_kfree(dev, seg); @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ ice_cfg_fdir_xtrct_seq(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp, if (!seg) return -ENOMEM; - tun_seg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg) * ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, + tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL); if (!tun_seg) { devm_kfree(dev, seg); diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c index 13b2bdc25b0d..fd10f8548feb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ int ice_setup_tx_ring(struct ice_ring *tx_ring) /* warn if we are about to overwrite the pointer */ WARN_ON(tx_ring->tx_buf); tx_ring->tx_buf = - devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_ring->tx_buf) * tx_ring->count, + devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_ring->tx_buf), tx_ring->count, GFP_KERNEL); if (!tx_ring->tx_buf) return -ENOMEM; @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ int ice_setup_rx_ring(struct ice_ring *rx_ring) /* warn if we are about to overwrite the pointer */ WARN_ON(rx_ring->rx_buf); rx_ring->rx_buf = - devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rx_ring->rx_buf) * rx_ring->count, + devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*rx_ring->rx_buf), rx_ring->count, GFP_KERNEL); if (!rx_ring->rx_buf) return -ENOMEM;
Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc(). Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c | 4 ++-- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)