diff mbox series

nfc: port100: fix using -ERRNO as command type mask

Message ID 20211025144751.555551-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series nfc: port100: fix using -ERRNO as command type mask | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 25, 2021, 2:47 p.m. UTC
During probing, the driver tries to get a list (mask) of supported
command types in port100_get_command_type_mask() function.  The value
is u64 and 0 is treated as invalid mask (no commands supported).  The
function however returns also -ERRNO as u64 which will be interpret as
valid command mask.

Return 0 on every error case of port100_get_command_type_mask(), so the
probing will stop.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 0347a6ab300a ("NFC: port100: Commands mechanism implementation")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/port100.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 25, 2021, 2:48 p.m. UTC | #1
On 25/10/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> During probing, the driver tries to get a list (mask) of supported
> command types in port100_get_command_type_mask() function.  The value
> is u64 and 0 is treated as invalid mask (no commands supported).  The
> function however returns also -ERRNO as u64 which will be interpret as
> valid command mask.
> 
> Return 0 on every error case of port100_get_command_type_mask(), so the
> probing will stop.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 0347a6ab300a ("NFC: port100: Commands mechanism implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nfc/port100.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> index 1296148b4566..ec1630bfedf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> @@ -1109,15 +1109,11 @@ static u64 port100_get_command_type_mask(struct port100 *dev)
>  
>  	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
>  	if (!skb)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		return 0;
>  
> -	nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);

Mistake, please ignore.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index 1296148b4566..ec1630bfedf4 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -1109,15 +1109,11 @@  static u64 port100_get_command_type_mask(struct port100 *dev)
 
 	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
 	if (!skb)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		return 0;
 
-	nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
 	resp = port100_send_cmd_sync(dev, PORT100_CMD_GET_COMMAND_TYPE, skb);
-	if (IS_ERR(resp)) {
-		nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-		return PTR_ERR(resp);
-	}
-	nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+	if (IS_ERR(resp))
+		return 0;
 
 	if (resp->len < 8)
 		mask = 0;