| Message ID | 20210922103116.30652-3-chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ASPEED SD/eMMC controller clock configuration | expand |
Hi Chin-Ting, Sorry for the delay in looking at your series. On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote: > From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller > of AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound > stable frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50 > supported bit, instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register > should be set in advance. > > Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26) > /* SDIO{14,24} */ > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1) > +/* SDIO{14,24} */ I don't think we need to duplicate this comment. > +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0) Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)? > > struct aspeed_sdc { > struct clk *clk; > @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > sdhci_get_of_property(pdev); > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") || > + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") || Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are aligned vertically from the left? > of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V, > true, slot); > } > > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) { > + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50, > + true, slot); > + } > + > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104, > true, slot); > -- > 2.17.1
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the review. > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 8:31 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sdhci: aspeed: Add SDR50 support > > Hi Chin-Ting, > > Sorry for the delay in looking at your series. > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote: > > From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller of > > AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound stable > > frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50 supported bit, > > instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register should be set in advance. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > > index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ > > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26) > > /* SDIO{14,24} */ > > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1) > > +/* SDIO{14,24} */ > > I don't think we need to duplicate this comment. Okay, it will be modified in the next patch version. > > > +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0) > > Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put > ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)? > Okay. > > > > struct aspeed_sdc { > > struct clk *clk; > > @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct > > platform_device *pdev) > > sdhci_get_of_property(pdev); > > > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") || > > + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") || > > Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are aligned > vertically from the left? > It will also be updated in the next patch version. > > of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { > > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, > ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V, > > true, slot); > > } > > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) { > > + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, > ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50, > > + true, slot); > > + } > > + > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { > > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, > ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104, > > true, slot); > > -- > > 2.17.1 Chin-Ting
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26) /* SDIO{14,24} */ #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1) +/* SDIO{14,24} */ +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0) struct aspeed_sdc { struct clk *clk; @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) sdhci_get_of_property(pdev); if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") || + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") || of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V, true, slot); } + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) { + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50, + true, slot); + } + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) { aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104, true, slot);
From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller of AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound stable frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50 supported bit, instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register should be set in advance. Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@aspeedtech.com> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)