Message ID | 20211027152534.3366799-1-marcel@ziswiler.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1] drm: import DMA_BUF module namespace | expand |
Hi, thanks for the patch. Am 27.10.21 um 17:25 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > Today's -next fails building arm64 defconfig as follows: > > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vunmap from > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vmap from > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> > Fixes: commit 4b2b5e142ff4 ("drm: Move GEM memory managers into modules") > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h> > > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); Could this line be moved to the bottom of the file, where the other MODULE statements are? In the fixed commit 4b2b5e142ff4, there's a similar change for drm_gem_shmem_helper.c. It uses dma-buf_vmap as well. Does that module require the same fix? Do you have any idea why I don't see these errors in my builds? Best regards Thomas > + > /** > * DOC: cma helpers > * >
Sali Thomas On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 20:30 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the patch. You are very welcome. > Am 27.10.21 um 17:25 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > > > Today's -next fails building arm64 defconfig as follows: > > > > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vunmap from > > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vmap from > > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> > > Fixes: commit 4b2b5e142ff4 ("drm: Move GEM memory managers into modules") > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > > #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h> > > #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h> > > > > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); > > Could this line be moved to the bottom of the file, where the other > MODULE statements are? Hehe, good question. I was actually asking myself the same but quickly looking at a few files and they all had it after their includes towards the top. Turns out that was rather short sighted... Let me look more closely. Current -next has exactly 200 files with a MODULE_IMPORT_NS statement. Okay, some of which are documentation. Anyway, 132 of which do have it with their other MODULE macros towards the end as you suggest. 20 of which and mainly DRM stuff has it towards the top after them includes. Funny. What does the documentation suggest? Documentation/core-api/symbol-namespaces.rst "It is advisable to add the MODULE_IMPORT_NS() statement close to other module metadata definitions like MODULE_AUTHOR() or MODULE_LICENSE(). Refer to section 5. for a way to create missing import statements automatically." There you go. Plus there is even some fancy automation (;-p). So let me move it down there then. > In the fixed commit 4b2b5e142ff4, there's a similar change for > drm_gem_shmem_helper.c. It uses dma-buf_vmap as well. Does that module > require the same fix? Likely. Let me just run ze automation and see what we get... > Do you have any idea why I don't see these errors in my builds? Well, I guess, there are various KCONFIG symbols influencing that whole story. How about e.g. init/Kconfig:config MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS > Best regards > Thomas Cheers Marcel > > + > > /** > > * DOC: cma helpers > > * > > > > -- > Thomas Zimmermann > Graphics Driver Developer > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) > Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Hi Am 27.10.21 um 22:54 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > Sali Thomas > > On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 20:30 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> thanks for the patch. > > You are very welcome. > >> Am 27.10.21 um 17:25 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: >>> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> >>> >>> Today's -next fails building arm64 defconfig as follows: >>> >>> ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vunmap from >>> namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. >>> ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vmap from >>> namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. >>> >>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> >>> Fixes: commit 4b2b5e142ff4 ("drm: Move GEM memory managers into modules") >>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c >>> index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c >>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ >>> #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h> >>> #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h> >>> >>> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); >> >> Could this line be moved to the bottom of the file, where the other >> MODULE statements are? > > Hehe, good question. I was actually asking myself the same but quickly looking at a few files and they all had > it after their includes towards the top. Turns out that was rather short sighted... > > Let me look more closely. Current -next has exactly 200 files with a MODULE_IMPORT_NS statement. Okay, some of > which are documentation. Anyway, 132 of which do have it with their other MODULE macros towards the end as you > suggest. 20 of which and mainly DRM stuff has it towards the top after them includes. Funny. > > What does the documentation suggest? > > Documentation/core-api/symbol-namespaces.rst > > "It is advisable to add the MODULE_IMPORT_NS() statement close to other module > metadata definitions like MODULE_AUTHOR() or MODULE_LICENSE(). Refer to section > 5. for a way to create missing import statements automatically." > > There you go. Plus there is even some fancy automation (;-p). > > So let me move it down there then. Will you send out another revision of the patch? > >> In the fixed commit 4b2b5e142ff4, there's a similar change for >> drm_gem_shmem_helper.c. It uses dma-buf_vmap as well. Does that module >> require the same fix? > > Likely. Let me just run ze automation and see what we get... > >> Do you have any idea why I don't see these errors in my builds? > > Well, I guess, there are various KCONFIG symbols influencing that whole story. How about e.g. > > init/Kconfig:config MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS Thanks for the hint. Best regards Thomas > >> Best regards >> Thomas > > Cheers > > Marcel > >>> + >>> /** >>> * DOC: cma helpers >>> * >>> >> >> -- >> Thomas Zimmermann >> Graphics Driver Developer >> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH >> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany >> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) >> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer >
On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 20:45 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 27.10.21 um 22:54 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > Sali Thomas > > > > On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 20:30 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > thanks for the patch. > > > > You are very welcome. > > > > > Am 27.10.21 um 17:25 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > > > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > > > > > > > Today's -next fails building arm64 defconfig as follows: > > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vunmap from > > > > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > > > > ERROR: modpost: module drm_cma_helper uses symbol dma_buf_vmap from > > > > namespace DMA_BUF, but does not import it. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> > > > > Fixes: commit 4b2b5e142ff4 ("drm: Move GEM memory managers into modules") > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > > > index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c > > > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h> > > > > > > > > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); > > > > > > Could this line be moved to the bottom of the file, where the other > > > MODULE statements are? > > > > Hehe, good question. I was actually asking myself the same but quickly looking at a few files and they all > > had > > it after their includes towards the top. Turns out that was rather short sighted... > > > > Let me look more closely. Current -next has exactly 200 files with a MODULE_IMPORT_NS statement. Okay, some > > of > > which are documentation. Anyway, 132 of which do have it with their other MODULE macros towards the end as > > you > > suggest. 20 of which and mainly DRM stuff has it towards the top after them includes. Funny. > > > > What does the documentation suggest? > > > > Documentation/core-api/symbol-namespaces.rst > > > > "It is advisable to add the MODULE_IMPORT_NS() statement close to other module > > metadata definitions like MODULE_AUTHOR() or MODULE_LICENSE(). Refer to section > > 5. for a way to create missing import statements automatically." > > > > There you go. Plus there is even some fancy automation (;-p). > > > > So let me move it down there then. > > Will you send out another revision of the patch? I already did. https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=163537686316807 > > > In the fixed commit 4b2b5e142ff4, there's a similar change for > > > drm_gem_shmem_helper.c. It uses dma-buf_vmap as well. Does that module > > > require the same fix? > > > > Likely. Let me just run ze automation and see what we get... > > > > > Do you have any idea why I don't see these errors in my builds? > > > > Well, I guess, there are various KCONFIG symbols influencing that whole story. How about e.g. > > > > init/Kconfig:config MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS > > Thanks for the hint. Welcome. > Best regards > Thomas > > > > > > Best regards > > > Thomas > > > > Cheers > > > > Marcel > > > > > > + > > > > /** > > > > * DOC: cma helpers > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thomas Zimmermann > > > Graphics Driver Developer > > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > > > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > > > (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) > > > Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer > > > > -- > Thomas Zimmermann > Graphics Driver Developer > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) > Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c index 6f7b3f8ec04d3..69f8564ad11cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h> #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF); + /** * DOC: cma helpers *