Message ID | cover.1636610337.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm/damon: Do some small changes | expand |
Hello Xin, On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:07:00 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > These four patches are mainly to do some small changes. > > V1 -> V2 > Add reviewed by SeongJae Park > Add two new patches > V1: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/cover.1636546262.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com/ > > > Xin Hao (4): > mm/damon: Unified access_check function naming rules > mm/damon: Add 'age' of region tracepoint support > mm/damon/core: Using function abs() instead of diff_of() > mm/damon: Remove some no need func definitions in damon.h file Overall, all patches looks good to me, though I asked[1] a trivial change in the commit message of the second patch. Also, I found one interesting thing. It seems you are wrapping body of the commit messages at <75 columns[2]? That's obviously neither a problem, nor even trivial nit. But... I'd prefer the messages look more consistent with others. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20211111082034.13323-1-sj@kernel.org/ [2] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html?highlight=75#the-canonical-patch-format Thanks, SJ > > include/linux/damon.h | 25 ++----------------------- > include/trace/events/damon.h | 7 +++++-- > mm/damon/core.c | 6 ++---- > mm/damon/vaddr.c | 8 ++++---- > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.31.0
Hi, Park: On 2021/11/11 下午5:24, SeongJae Park wrote: > Hello Xin, > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:07:00 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > >> These four patches are mainly to do some small changes. >> >> V1 -> V2 >> Add reviewed by SeongJae Park >> Add two new patches >> V1: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/cover.1636546262.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com/ >> >> >> Xin Hao (4): >> mm/damon: Unified access_check function naming rules >> mm/damon: Add 'age' of region tracepoint support >> mm/damon/core: Using function abs() instead of diff_of() >> mm/damon: Remove some no need func definitions in damon.h file > Overall, all patches looks good to me, though I asked[1] a trivial change in > the commit message of the second patch. Ok, I will add a detail message to explain it in commit in my next patch, thanks. > > Also, I found one interesting thing. It seems you are wrapping body of the > commit messages at <75 columns[2]? That's obviously neither a problem, nor > even trivial nit. But... I'd prefer the messages look more consistent with > others. Thank you very much for your careful correction, I will fix it in my next patch too. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20211111082034.13323-1-sj@kernel.org/ > [2] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html?highlight=75#the-canonical-patch-format > > > Thanks, > SJ > >> include/linux/damon.h | 25 ++----------------------- >> include/trace/events/damon.h | 7 +++++-- >> mm/damon/core.c | 6 ++---- >> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 8 ++++---- >> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.31.0