Message ID | 20211114223026.13359-7-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | spi: dw: Cleanup macros/funcs naming and add IP-core version support | expand |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > Since there is a common IP-core and component versions interface available > we can use it to differentiate the DW HSSI device features in the code. > Let's remove the corresponding DWC_HSSI capability flag then and use the > dw_spi_ip_is() macro instead. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> But see below. > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> > > --- > > Changelog v2: > - This is a new patch created as a logical result of a new DW SSI IP-core > versions internal interface introduced in the previous patch. > --- > drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/spi/spi-dw.h | 3 +-- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > index 42536b448ddd..934cc7a922e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static u32 dw_spi_prepare_cr0(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) > { > u32 cr0 = 0; > > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { > /* CTRLR0[ 5: 4] Frame Format */ > cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_FRF_MASK, DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_MOTO_SPI); > > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ void dw_spi_update_config(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi, > /* CTRLR0[ 4/3: 0] or CTRLR0[ 20: 16] Data Frame Size */ > cr0 |= (cfg->dfs - 1) << dws->dfs_offset; > > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) > /* CTRLR0[ 9:8] Transfer Mode */ > cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_TMOD_MASK, cfg->tmode); > else > @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) > dws->ver = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_VERSION); > > dev_dbg(dev, "Synopsys DWC%sSSI v%c.%c%c\n", > - (dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI) ? " " : " APB ", > + dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI) ? " APB " : " ", > DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 3), DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 2), > DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 1)); > } > @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) > * writability. Note DWC SSI controller also has the extended DFS, but > * with zero offset. > */ > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { > u32 cr0, tmp = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR0); > > dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > index 0b37bd32b041..c0e5bb6add0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int dw_spi_pssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) > { > - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; > + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; > > dw_spi_dma_setup_generic(&dwsmmio->dws); > > @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > static int dw_spi_keembay_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) > { > - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST | DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; > + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; > + dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > index 2f7d77024b48..d5ee5130601e 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ > /* DW SPI controller capabilities */ > #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0) > #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST BIT(1) > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(2) > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(3) > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(2) In one patch you move this in the file upper. Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit. Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which brings us to simple -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) here. > > /* Register offsets (Generic for both DWC APB SSI and DWC SSI IP-cores) */ > #define DW_SPI_CTRLR0 0x00
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > Since there is a common IP-core and component versions interface available > > we can use it to differentiate the DW HSSI device features in the code. > > Let's remove the corresponding DWC_HSSI capability flag then and use the > > dw_spi_ip_is() macro instead. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > > But see below. > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> > > > > --- > > > > Changelog v2: > > - This is a new patch created as a logical result of a new DW SSI IP-core > > versions internal interface introduced in the previous patch. > > --- > > drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 5 +++-- > > drivers/spi/spi-dw.h | 3 +-- > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > > index 42536b448ddd..934cc7a922e8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static u32 dw_spi_prepare_cr0(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) > > { > > u32 cr0 = 0; > > > > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { > > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { > > /* CTRLR0[ 5: 4] Frame Format */ > > cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_FRF_MASK, DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_MOTO_SPI); > > > > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ void dw_spi_update_config(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi, > > /* CTRLR0[ 4/3: 0] or CTRLR0[ 20: 16] Data Frame Size */ > > cr0 |= (cfg->dfs - 1) << dws->dfs_offset; > > > > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) > > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) > > /* CTRLR0[ 9:8] Transfer Mode */ > > cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_TMOD_MASK, cfg->tmode); > > else > > @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) > > dws->ver = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_VERSION); > > > > dev_dbg(dev, "Synopsys DWC%sSSI v%c.%c%c\n", > > - (dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI) ? " " : " APB ", > > + dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI) ? " APB " : " ", > > DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 3), DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 2), > > DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 1)); > > } > > @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) > > * writability. Note DWC SSI controller also has the extended DFS, but > > * with zero offset. > > */ > > - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { > > + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { > > u32 cr0, tmp = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR0); > > > > dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > > index 0b37bd32b041..c0e5bb6add0a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c > > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int dw_spi_pssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > > static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > > struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) > > { > > - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; > > + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; > > > > dw_spi_dma_setup_generic(&dwsmmio->dws); > > > > @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > > static int dw_spi_keembay_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > > struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) > > { > > - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST | DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; > > + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; > > + dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST; > > > > return 0; > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > > index 2f7d77024b48..d5ee5130601e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h > > @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ > > /* DW SPI controller capabilities */ > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0) > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST BIT(1) > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(2) > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(3) > > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(2) > > In one patch you move this in the file upper. > Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit. > > Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which > brings us to simple > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) > > here. I can change the bit-numbers assignment in the previous patch, which moves this block of macros up to the top of the file. Thus we'll have just a single -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) here. What do you think? Is that what you meant? -Sergey > > > > > /* Register offsets (Generic for both DWC APB SSI and DWC SSI IP-cores) */ > > #define DW_SPI_CTRLR0 0x00 > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:08 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: ... > > > /* DW SPI controller capabilities */ > > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0) > > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST BIT(1) > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(2) > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(3) > > > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(2) > > > In one patch you move this in the file upper. > > Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit. > > > > Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which > > brings us to simple > > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) > > > > here. > > I can change the bit-numbers assignment in the previous patch, which > moves this block of macros up to the top of the file. Thus we'll > have just a single > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) > here. What do you think? Is that what you meant? I think that reassignment doesn't fit the previous patch per se, hence I proposed to have yet another one, But in any case it's a minor thingy.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:19:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:08 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > ... > > > > > /* DW SPI controller capabilities */ > > > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0) > > > > #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST BIT(1) > > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(2) > > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(3) > > > > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(2) > > > > > In one patch you move this in the file upper. > > > Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit. > > > > > > Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which > > > brings us to simple > > > > > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) > > > > > > here. > > > > I can change the bit-numbers assignment in the previous patch, which > > moves this block of macros up to the top of the file. Thus we'll > > have just a single > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(3) > > here. What do you think? Is that what you meant? > > I think that reassignment doesn't fit the previous patch per se, hence > I proposed to have yet another one, > But in any case it's a minor > thingy. Since I have to resend the series one more time I'll do as you suggested and unpin the bit numbering change into a separate patch. -Sergey > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c index 42536b448ddd..934cc7a922e8 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static u32 dw_spi_prepare_cr0(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) { u32 cr0 = 0; - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { /* CTRLR0[ 5: 4] Frame Format */ cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_FRF_MASK, DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_MOTO_SPI); @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ void dw_spi_update_config(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi, /* CTRLR0[ 4/3: 0] or CTRLR0[ 20: 16] Data Frame Size */ cr0 |= (cfg->dfs - 1) << dws->dfs_offset; - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) /* CTRLR0[ 9:8] Transfer Mode */ cr0 |= FIELD_PREP(DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_TMOD_MASK, cfg->tmode); else @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) dws->ver = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_VERSION); dev_dbg(dev, "Synopsys DWC%sSSI v%c.%c%c\n", - (dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI) ? " " : " APB ", + dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI) ? " APB " : " ", DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 3), DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 2), DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(dws->ver, 1)); } @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static void dw_spi_hw_init(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws) * writability. Note DWC SSI controller also has the extended DFS, but * with zero offset. */ - if (!(dws->caps & DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI)) { + if (dw_spi_ip_is(dws, PSSI)) { u32 cr0, tmp = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR0); dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c index 0b37bd32b041..c0e5bb6add0a 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int dw_spi_pssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) { - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; dw_spi_dma_setup_generic(&dwsmmio->dws); @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ static int dw_spi_hssi_init(struct platform_device *pdev, static int dw_spi_keembay_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio) { - dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST | DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI; + dwsmmio->dws.ip = DW_HSSI_ID; + dwsmmio->dws.caps = DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST; return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h index 2f7d77024b48..d5ee5130601e 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ /* DW SPI controller capabilities */ #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0) #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST BIT(1) -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI BIT(2) -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(3) +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(2) /* Register offsets (Generic for both DWC APB SSI and DWC SSI IP-cores) */ #define DW_SPI_CTRLR0 0x00
Since there is a common IP-core and component versions interface available we can use it to differentiate the DW HSSI device features in the code. Let's remove the corresponding DWC_HSSI capability flag then and use the dw_spi_ip_is() macro instead. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> --- Changelog v2: - This is a new patch created as a logical result of a new DW SSI IP-core versions internal interface introduced in the previous patch. --- drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 5 +++-- drivers/spi/spi-dw.h | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)