Message ID | 20211126090107.1243558-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] media: i2c: dw9714: add optional regulator support | expand |
Hi Martin, On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > From: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > > Allow the dw9714 to control a regulator and adjust suspend() and resume() > to support both runtime and system pm. > > Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> > --- > > revision history > ---------------- > > v2: (thank you Mark) > * simplify the regulator_get_optional() error path > * fix regulator usage during probe() > > v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211125080922.978583-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm/ > > > > drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > index 3863dfeb8293..e8cc19b89861 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > #include <linux/i2c.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> > #include <media/v4l2-device.h> > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct dw9714_device { > struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls_vcm; > struct v4l2_subdev sd; > u16 current_val; > + struct regulator *vcc; > }; > > static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) > @@ -145,6 +147,21 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > if (dw9714_dev == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vcc"); You you used regular devm_regulator_get(), you could remove the error handling below. If there's no regulator, you'll simply get a dummy one. > + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) { > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "No vcc regulator found: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)); > + dw9714_dev->vcc = NULL; > + } > + > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { With (dummy) regulators, these checks become unnecessary. > + rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > + if (rval < 0) { > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable vcc: %d\n", rval); > + return rval; > + } > + } > + > v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9714_dev->sd, client, &dw9714_ops); > dw9714_dev->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | > V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; > @@ -200,6 +217,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > int ret, val; > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > + return 0; This can't take place in a runtime PM suspend callback. You'll need to add system suspend callback for this. > + > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val & ~(DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1); > val >= 0; val -= DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > ret = dw9714_i2c_write(client, > @@ -208,6 +228,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > dev_err_once(dev, "%s I2C failure: %d", __func__, ret); > usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10); > } > + > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > + ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", ret); > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -224,6 +251,18 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev) > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > int ret, val; > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) Same for this one. > + return 0; > + > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > + ret = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + usleep_range(1000, 2000); > + } > + > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS; > val < dw9714_dev->current_val + DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1; > val += DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) {
Am Freitag, dem 26.11.2021 um 12:44 +0200 schrieb Sakari Ailus: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > From: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > > > > Allow the dw9714 to control a regulator and adjust suspend() and > > resume() > > to support both runtime and system pm. > > > > Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> > > --- > > > > revision history > > ---------------- > > > > v2: (thank you Mark) > > * simplify the regulator_get_optional() error path > > * fix regulator usage during probe() > > > > v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211125080922.978583-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm/ > > > > > > > > drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c | 39 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > index 3863dfeb8293..e8cc19b89861 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include <linux/i2c.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-device.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct dw9714_device { > > struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls_vcm; > > struct v4l2_subdev sd; > > u16 current_val; > > + struct regulator *vcc; > > }; > > > > static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl > > *ctrl) > > @@ -145,6 +147,21 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client > > *client) > > if (dw9714_dev == NULL) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, > > "vcc"); > > You you used regular devm_regulator_get(), you could remove the error > handling below. If there's no regulator, you'll simply get a dummy > one. ok thanks > > > + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) { > > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "No vcc regulator found: > > %ld\n", > > + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)); > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = NULL; > > + } > > + > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > With (dummy) regulators, these checks become unnecessary. > > > + rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (rval < 0) { > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable > > vcc: %d\n", rval); > > + return rval; > > + } > > + } > > + > > v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9714_dev->sd, client, &dw9714_ops); > > dw9714_dev->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | > > V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; > > @@ -200,6 +217,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > int ret, val; > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > + return 0; > > This can't take place in a runtime PM suspend callback. You'll need > to add > system suspend callback for this. but this function is both the system and runtime suspend callback. doesn't splitting up the callbacks just add lines of code unnecessarily? > > > + > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val & ~(DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - > > 1); > > val >= 0; val -= DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > > ret = dw9714_i2c_write(client, > > @@ -208,6 +228,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > dev_err_once(dev, "%s I2C failure: %d", > > __func__, ret); > > usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, > > DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10); > > } > > + > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > + ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", > > ret); > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -224,6 +251,18 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev) > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > int ret, val; > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > Same for this one. > > > + return 0; > > + > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > + ret = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", > > ret); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000); > > + } > > + > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS; > > val < dw9714_dev->current_val + DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1; > > val += DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { >
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:06:03PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 26.11.2021 um 12:44 +0200 schrieb Sakari Ailus: > > Hi Martin, > > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > From: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > > > > > > Allow the dw9714 to control a regulator and adjust suspend() and > > > resume() > > > to support both runtime and system pm. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> > > > --- > > > > > > revision history > > > ---------------- > > > > > > v2: (thank you Mark) > > > * simplify the regulator_get_optional() error path > > > * fix regulator usage during probe() > > > > > > v1: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211125080922.978583-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm/ > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c | 39 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > > b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > > index 3863dfeb8293..e8cc19b89861 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/i2c.h> > > > #include <linux/module.h> > > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> > > > #include <media/v4l2-device.h> > > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > > > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct dw9714_device { > > > struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls_vcm; > > > struct v4l2_subdev sd; > > > u16 current_val; > > > + struct regulator *vcc; > > > }; > > > > > > static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl > > > *ctrl) > > > @@ -145,6 +147,21 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client > > > *client) > > > if (dw9714_dev == NULL) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, > > > "vcc"); > > > > You you used regular devm_regulator_get(), you could remove the error > > handling below. If there's no regulator, you'll simply get a dummy > > one. > > ok thanks > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) { > > > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "No vcc regulator found: > > > %ld\n", > > > + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)); > > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = NULL; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > > > With (dummy) regulators, these checks become unnecessary. > > > > > + rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > > + if (rval < 0) { > > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable > > > vcc: %d\n", rval); > > > + return rval; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9714_dev->sd, client, &dw9714_ops); > > > dw9714_dev->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | > > > V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; > > > @@ -200,6 +217,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > > int ret, val; > > > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > > + return 0; > > > > This can't take place in a runtime PM suspend callback. You'll need > > to add > > system suspend callback for this. > > but this function is both the system and runtime suspend callback. > doesn't splitting up the callbacks just add lines of code > unnecessarily? Hmm. After thinking about this a little, I think this could indeed work. Yeah, please leave it as-is. > > > > > > + > > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val & ~(DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - > > > 1); > > > val >= 0; val -= DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > > > ret = dw9714_i2c_write(client, > > > @@ -208,6 +228,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > dev_err_once(dev, "%s I2C failure: %d", > > > __func__, ret); > > > usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, > > > DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10); > > > } > > > + > > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > > + ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > > + if (ret) > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", > > > ret); > > > + } > > > + > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -224,6 +251,18 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > > dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev) > > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > > int ret, val; > > > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > > > Same for this one. > > > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { > > > + ret = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > > + if (ret) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", > > > ret); > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000); > > > + } > > > + > > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS; > > > val < dw9714_dev->current_val + DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1; > > > val += DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > > > >
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vcc"); > + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) { > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "No vcc regulator found: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)); > + dw9714_dev->vcc = NULL; > + } To repeat my original feedback: unless the supply can be physically absent you should use regulator_get(). The _optional variants are only for cases where the supply might be physically absent.
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c index 3863dfeb8293..e8cc19b89861 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> #include <media/v4l2-device.h> #include <media/v4l2-event.h> @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct dw9714_device { struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls_vcm; struct v4l2_subdev sd; u16 current_val; + struct regulator *vcc; }; static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) @@ -145,6 +147,21 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client *client) if (dw9714_dev == NULL) return -ENOMEM; + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vcc"); + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) { + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "No vcc regulator found: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)); + dw9714_dev->vcc = NULL; + } + + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { + rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); + if (rval < 0) { + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable vcc: %d\n", rval); + return rval; + } + } + v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9714_dev->sd, client, &dw9714_ops); dw9714_dev->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; @@ -200,6 +217,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); int ret, val; + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) + return 0; + for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val & ~(DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1); val >= 0; val -= DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { ret = dw9714_i2c_write(client, @@ -208,6 +228,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) dev_err_once(dev, "%s I2C failure: %d", __func__, ret); usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10); } + + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { + ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", ret); + } + return 0; } @@ -224,6 +251,18 @@ static int __maybe_unused dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev) struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); int ret, val; + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) + return 0; + + if (dw9714_dev->vcc) { + ret = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + usleep_range(1000, 2000); + } + for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS; val < dw9714_dev->current_val + DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1; val += DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) {