Message ID | 20211220132439.1194-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/1] gpio: Remove unused local OF node pointers | expand |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node > assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused. > Remove them for good and make compiler happy about. > > Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c | 1 - > drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c | 1 - > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > index 176c264bb959..74ef89248867 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > gc->owner = THIS_MODULE; > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch? Bart > if (!gc->label) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto fail; > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c > index 77a3fbd46111..2109803ffb38 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c > @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int gw_pld_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > const struct i2c_device_id *id) > { > struct device *dev = &client->dev; > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > struct gw_pld *gw; > int ret; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c > index 52b49e7a0a80..ccaad1cb3c2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c > @@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, > } > > static int > -mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(struct device *dev, > - struct device_node *node, int bank) > +mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(struct device *dev, int bank) > { > struct mtk *mtk = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct mtk_gc *rg; > @@ -310,7 +309,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtk); > > for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++) { > - ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i); > + ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, i); > if (ret) > return ret; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c > index 0d03f525dcd3..62ba18b3a602 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c > @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static void rda_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > > static int rda_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; > struct rda_gpio *rda_gpio; > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:09 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node > > assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused. > > Remove them for good and make compiler happy about. > > > > Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> ... > > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); > > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); > > This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch? It actually makes use of the local np IIRC. It's related, no?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:09 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node > > > assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused. > > > Remove them for good and make compiler happy about. > > > > > > Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") > > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > ... > > > > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); > > > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); > > > > This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch? > > It actually makes use of the local np IIRC. > It's related, no? No, the np pointer is already used elsewhere. You just replace the dev->of_node here with np. Rightfully so, but it's not part of this commit logically. Bart
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:09 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: ... > > > > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); > > > > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); > > > > > > This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch? > > > > It actually makes use of the local np IIRC. > > It's related, no? > > No, the np pointer is already used elsewhere. You just replace the > dev->of_node here with np. Rightfully so, but it's not part of this > commit logically. I see. Probably I missed that somehow. Nevertheless, do you want a new version or can you just revert that particular change?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:21 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:09 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > ... > > > > > > - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); > > > > > + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); > > > > > > > > This is unrelated though. Can you make it a separate patch? > > > > > > It actually makes use of the local np IIRC. > > > It's related, no? > > > > No, the np pointer is already used elsewhere. You just replace the > > dev->of_node here with np. Rightfully so, but it's not part of this > > commit logically. > > I see. Probably I missed that somehow. > Nevertheless, do you want a new version or can you just revert that > particular change? > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko I removed it and queued the rest. Bart
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:21 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: ... > > I see. Probably I missed that somehow. > > Nevertheless, do you want a new version or can you just revert that > > particular change? > > I removed it and queued the rest. Thank you!
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c index 176c264bb959..74ef89248867 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } gc->owner = THIS_MODULE; - gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", dev->of_node); + gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); if (!gc->label) { err = -ENOMEM; goto fail; diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c index 77a3fbd46111..2109803ffb38 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int gw_pld_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) { struct device *dev = &client->dev; - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; struct gw_pld *gw; int ret; diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c index 52b49e7a0a80..ccaad1cb3c2e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c @@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, } static int -mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(struct device *dev, - struct device_node *node, int bank) +mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(struct device *dev, int bank) { struct mtk *mtk = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct mtk_gc *rg; @@ -310,7 +309,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtk); for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++) { - ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i); + ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, i); if (ret) return ret; } diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c index 0d03f525dcd3..62ba18b3a602 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static void rda_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) static int rda_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; struct rda_gpio *rda_gpio;
After the commit 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") the OF node local pointers become unused. Remove them for good and make compiler happy about. Fixes: 448cf90513d9 ("gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 2 +- drivers/gpio/gpio-gw-pld.c | 1 - drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c | 5 ++--- drivers/gpio/gpio-rda.c | 1 - 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)