Message ID | 32ad5b5c10da7204dc4a2d3ca74f8d73745925a7.1640927044.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) | expand |
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 05:04:02AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > This modifies the new display_update_messages() function to allow > printing to somewhere other than stdout. > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > --- > merge-ort.c | 7 +++++-- > merge-ort.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c > index 6237e2fb7fe..86eebf39166 100644 > --- a/merge-ort.c > +++ b/merge-ort.c > [...] > @@ -4271,6 +4272,8 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt, > trace2_region_leave("merge", "write_auto_merge", opt->repo); > } > > + if (display_update_msgs) > + merge_display_update_messages(opt, result, stdout); is it intentional that the previous patch doesn't have this call?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 12:08 PM Johannes Altmanninger <aclopte@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 05:04:02AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote: > > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > > > This modifies the new display_update_messages() function to allow > > printing to somewhere other than stdout. > > > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > --- > > merge-ort.c | 7 +++++-- > > merge-ort.h | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c > > index 6237e2fb7fe..86eebf39166 100644 > > --- a/merge-ort.c > > +++ b/merge-ort.c > > [...] > > @@ -4271,6 +4272,8 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt, > > trace2_region_leave("merge", "write_auto_merge", opt->repo); > > } > > > > + if (display_update_msgs) > > + merge_display_update_messages(opt, result, stdout); > > is it intentional that the previous patch doesn't have this call? Ugh, oops. Yeah, bad split of the patches; this should have been part of the previous one.
diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c index 6237e2fb7fe..86eebf39166 100644 --- a/merge-ort.c +++ b/merge-ort.c @@ -4198,7 +4198,8 @@ static int record_conflicted_index_entries(struct merge_options *opt) } void merge_display_update_messages(struct merge_options *opt, - struct merge_result *result) + struct merge_result *result, + FILE *stream) { struct merge_options_internal *opti = result->priv; struct hashmap_iter iter; @@ -4222,7 +4223,7 @@ void merge_display_update_messages(struct merge_options *opt, for (i = 0; i < olist.nr; ++i) { struct strbuf *sb = olist.items[i].util; - printf("%s", sb->buf); + fprintf(stream, "%s", sb->buf); } string_list_clear(&olist, 0); @@ -4271,6 +4272,8 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt, trace2_region_leave("merge", "write_auto_merge", opt->repo); } + if (display_update_msgs) + merge_display_update_messages(opt, result, stdout); merge_finalize(opt, result); } diff --git a/merge-ort.h b/merge-ort.h index 1b93555a60b..55819a57da8 100644 --- a/merge-ort.h +++ b/merge-ort.h @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt, * so only call this when bypassing merge_switch_to_result(). */ void merge_display_update_messages(struct merge_options *opt, - struct merge_result *result); + struct merge_result *result, + FILE *stream); /* Do needed cleanup when not calling merge_switch_to_result() */ void merge_finalize(struct merge_options *opt,