| Message ID | 20220112161014.972076-1-jeanmichel.hautbois@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add 12bit and 14bit luma-only formats | expand |
Hi Jean-Michel, On 12/01/2022 17:10, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: > Hello, > > While working on adding the V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y12P and V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y14P > formats, I noticed an issue in the way V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y10P is described. > This series aims to solve it before adding Y12P and Y14P. > > Those two formats are needed for the next-to-come bcm2835 unicam driver. > > Jean-Michel Hautbois (3): > media: doc: pixfmt-yuv: Fix V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y10P format > media: v4l: Add V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y12P format > media: v4l: Add V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y14P format > > .../media/v4l/pixfmt-yuv-luma.rst | 48 ++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 2 + > include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 2 + > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > I'll take the first patch, but it is better to add patches 2 and 3 to the unicam RFC series. Adding pixelformats that are not used by any existing driver isn't a good idea and I'd like to avoid that. Regards, Hans
Hi Hans ! On 13/01/2022 10:15, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Jean-Michel, > > On 12/01/2022 17:10, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While working on adding the V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y12P and V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y14P >> formats, I noticed an issue in the way V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y10P is described. >> This series aims to solve it before adding Y12P and Y14P. >> >> Those two formats are needed for the next-to-come bcm2835 unicam driver. >> >> Jean-Michel Hautbois (3): >> media: doc: pixfmt-yuv: Fix V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y10P format >> media: v4l: Add V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y12P format >> media: v4l: Add V4L2-PIX-FMT-Y14P format >> >> .../media/v4l/pixfmt-yuv-luma.rst | 48 ++++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 2 + >> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 2 + >> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > I'll take the first patch, but it is better to add patches 2 and 3 to the unicam RFC > series. Adding pixelformats that are not used by any existing driver isn't a good idea > and I'd like to avoid that. Thanks, I will take those two patches back in the unicam RFC v2 series then. > > Regards, > > Hans >