| Message ID | 20220119072450.2890107-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | lib/string_helpers: Add a few string helpers | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
Hi Lucas, On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, > case 3: > if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO) > tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s", > - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log == > - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); > + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); This would be better split on two lines. Then, Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:15:08 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; } > > > > Perhaps keep it on 4 lines? Yes, yes/no is short, but if we add others > (enable/disable) it will not be possible to keep on one line. And hence > style will be broken among similar functions. Agreed. Functions should always be of the normal format: type func(params) { body; } Unless it is a stub function. type func(params) { return 0; } -- Steve
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, > > case 3: > > if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO) > > tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s", > > - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log == > > - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); > > + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); > > This would be better split on two lines. Really? Yuck! I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I still see it as 80. But anyway... cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES is not readable at all. Not compared to cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES I say keep it one line! Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> -- Steve > > Then, > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; }
return "yes\0no" + v * 4;
:-)
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
> > > > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; } > > return "yes\0no" + v * 4; > > :-) except '"no\0\0yes" + v * 4' works a bit better. - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 04:38:26PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > > > > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; } > > > > return "yes\0no" + v * 4; > > > > :-) > > except '"no\0\0yes" + v * 4' works a bit better. Is it a C code obfuscation contest?
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200 > Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, > > > case 3: > > > if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO) > > > tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s", > > > - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log == > > > - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); > > > + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); > > > > This would be better split on two lines. > > Really? Yuck! > > I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I > still see it as 80. But anyway... > > cond->grant_log == > TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES > > is not readable at all. Not compared to > > cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES > > I say keep it one line! > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> I believe Sakari strongly follows the 80 rule, which means... > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> ...chose either of these tags and be happy with :-)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200 >Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, >> > case 3: >> > if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO) >> > tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s", >> > - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log == >> > - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); >> > + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); >> >> This would be better split on two lines. > >Really? Yuck! > >I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I >still see it as 80. But anyway... Checking that: docs still say 80, but checkpatch was changed to warn only on 100. Commit bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning") is clear why the discrepancy. Lucas De Marchi > > cond->grant_log == > TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES > >is not readable at all. Not compared to > > cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES > >I say keep it one line! > >Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > >-- Steve > >> >> Then, >> >> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> >
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:22:57 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 04:38:26PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > > > > > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; } > > > > > > return "yes\0no" + v * 4; > > > > > > :-) > > > > except '"no\0\0yes" + v * 4' works a bit better. > > Is it a C code obfuscation contest? > return '/'/'/'; -- Steve
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:25:08 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > I say keep it one line! > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > I believe Sakari strongly follows the 80 rule, which means... Checkpatch says "100" I think we need to simply update the docs (the documentation always lags the code ;-) bdc48fa11e46f -- Steve
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 04:00:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:25:08 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > I say keep it one line! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > I believe Sakari strongly follows the 80 rule, which means... > > Checkpatch says "100" I think we need to simply update the docs (the > documentation always lags the code ;-) The idea of checkpatch change is for old code to avoid tons of patches to satisfy 80 rule in (mostly) staging code. Some maintainers started / have been using relaxed approach.
> > except '"no\0\0yes" + v * 4' works a bit better. > > Is it a C code obfuscation contest? That would be: return &(v * 3)["no\0yes"]; :-) - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 16:00 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:25:08 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > I say keep it one line! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > I believe Sakari strongly follows the 80 rule, which means... > > Checkpatch says "100" I think we need to simply update the docs (the > documentation always lags the code ;-) checkpatch doesn't say anything normally, it's a stupid script. It just mindlessly bleats a message when a line exceeds 100 chars... Just fyi: I think it's nicer on a single line too.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c index 9d43ecb1f692..b59760f91bf6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ * */ +#include <linux/string_helpers.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include "dc.h" @@ -49,11 +50,6 @@ struct dmub_debugfs_trace_entry { uint32_t param1; }; -static inline const char *yesno(bool v) -{ - return v ? "yes" : "no"; -} - /* parse_write_buffer_into_params - Helper function to parse debugfs write buffer into an array * * Function takes in attributes passed to debugfs write entry diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h index 7a5925072466..2a8781cc648b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h @@ -414,11 +414,6 @@ wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(unsigned long timestamp_jiffies, int to_wait_ms) #define MBps(x) KBps(1000 * (x)) #define GBps(x) ((u64)1000 * MBps((x))) -static inline const char *yesno(bool v) -{ - return v ? "yes" : "no"; -} - static inline const char *onoff(bool v) { return v ? "on" : "off"; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c index 7d49fd4edc9e..61a04d7abc1f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c @@ -2015,17 +2015,6 @@ static const struct file_operations rss_debugfs_fops = { /* RSS Configuration. */ -/* Small utility function to return the strings "yes" or "no" if the supplied - * argument is non-zero. - */ -static const char *yesno(int x) -{ - static const char *yes = "yes"; - static const char *no = "no"; - - return x ? yes : no; -} - static int rss_config_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) { struct adapter *adapter = seq->private; diff --git a/include/linux/string_helpers.h b/include/linux/string_helpers.h index 4ba39e1403b2..e980dec05d31 100644 --- a/include/linux/string_helpers.h +++ b/include/linux/string_helpers.h @@ -102,4 +102,6 @@ char *kstrdup_quotable_file(struct file *file, gfp_t gfp); void kfree_strarray(char **array, size_t n); +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; } + #endif diff --git a/security/tomoyo/audit.c b/security/tomoyo/audit.c index d79bf07e16be..1458e27361e8 100644 --- a/security/tomoyo/audit.c +++ b/security/tomoyo/audit.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static char *tomoyo_print_header(struct tomoyo_request_info *r) "#%04u/%02u/%02u %02u:%02u:%02u# profile=%u mode=%s granted=%s (global-pid=%u) task={ pid=%u ppid=%u uid=%u gid=%u euid=%u egid=%u suid=%u sgid=%u fsuid=%u fsgid=%u }", stamp.year, stamp.month, stamp.day, stamp.hour, stamp.min, stamp.sec, r->profile, tomoyo_mode[r->mode], - tomoyo_yesno(r->granted), gpid, tomoyo_sys_getpid(), + yesno(r->granted), gpid, tomoyo_sys_getpid(), tomoyo_sys_getppid(), from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()), from_kgid(&init_user_ns, current_gid()), diff --git a/security/tomoyo/common.c b/security/tomoyo/common.c index 5c64927bf2b3..304ed0f426dd 100644 --- a/security/tomoyo/common.c +++ b/security/tomoyo/common.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h> #include "common.h" /* String table for operation mode. */ @@ -174,16 +175,6 @@ static bool tomoyo_manage_by_non_root; /* Utility functions. */ -/** - * tomoyo_yesno - Return "yes" or "no". - * - * @value: Bool value. - */ -const char *tomoyo_yesno(const unsigned int value) -{ - return value ? "yes" : "no"; -} - /** * tomoyo_addprintf - strncat()-like-snprintf(). * @@ -730,8 +721,8 @@ static void tomoyo_print_config(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, const u8 config) { tomoyo_io_printf(head, "={ mode=%s grant_log=%s reject_log=%s }\n", tomoyo_mode[config & 3], - tomoyo_yesno(config & TOMOYO_CONFIG_WANT_GRANT_LOG), - tomoyo_yesno(config & TOMOYO_CONFIG_WANT_REJECT_LOG)); + yesno(config & TOMOYO_CONFIG_WANT_GRANT_LOG), + yesno(config & TOMOYO_CONFIG_WANT_REJECT_LOG)); } /** @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head, case 3: if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO) tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s", - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log == - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES)); tomoyo_set_lf(head); return true; } diff --git a/security/tomoyo/common.h b/security/tomoyo/common.h index 85246b9df7ca..ca285f362705 100644 --- a/security/tomoyo/common.h +++ b/security/tomoyo/common.h @@ -959,7 +959,6 @@ char *tomoyo_read_token(struct tomoyo_acl_param *param); char *tomoyo_realpath_from_path(const struct path *path); char *tomoyo_realpath_nofollow(const char *pathname); const char *tomoyo_get_exe(void); -const char *tomoyo_yesno(const unsigned int value); const struct tomoyo_path_info *tomoyo_compare_name_union (const struct tomoyo_path_info *name, const struct tomoyo_name_union *ptr); const struct tomoyo_path_info *tomoyo_get_domainname
There are a few implementations of yesno() in the tree. Consolidate them in include/linux/string_helpers.h. Quite a few users of open coded yesno() could later be converted to the new function: $ git grep '?\s*"yes"\s*' | wc -l 286 $ git grep '?\s*"no"\s*' | wc -l 20 The inlined function should keep the const strings local to each compilation unit, the same way it's now, thus not changing the current behavior. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> --- .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c | 6 +----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 5 ----- .../net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_debugfs.c | 11 ----------- include/linux/string_helpers.h | 2 ++ security/tomoyo/audit.c | 2 +- security/tomoyo/common.c | 18 ++++-------------- security/tomoyo/common.h | 1 - 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)