| Message ID | 20220120050522.23689-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v6] ACPI: explicit init HEST, SDEI and GHES in apci_init | expand |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 01:05:22PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: > From commit e147133a42cb ("ACPI / APEI: Make hest.c manage the estatus > memory pool") was merged, ghes_init() relies on acpi_hest_init() to manage > the estatus memory pool. On the other hand, ghes_init() relies on > sdei_init() to detect the SDEI version and (un)register events. The > dependencies are as follows: > > ghes_init() => acpi_hest_init() => acpi_bus_init() => acpi_init() > ghes_init() => sdei_init() > > HEST is not PCI-specific and initcall ordering is implicit and not > well-defined within a level. > > Based on above, remove acpi_hest_init() from acpi_pci_root_init() and > convert ghes_init() and sdei_init() from initcalls to explicit calls in the > following order: > > acpi_hest_init() > sdei_init() > ghes_init() > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> I didn't suggest the approach; I just reviewed the patch and the commit log and proposed moving it out of acpi_pci_root_init(). That doesn't need to be acknowledged. > Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Minor extra "return" below. > --- > drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 17 +++++++---------- > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 ++++ > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 3 --- > drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 13 ++----------- > include/acpi/apei.h | 4 +++- > include/linux/arm_sdei.h | 2 ++ > 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > index 0c5c9acc6254..bed4f10cfcb8 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > @@ -1457,33 +1457,33 @@ static struct platform_driver ghes_platform_driver = { > .remove = ghes_remove, > }; > > -static int __init ghes_init(void) > +void __init ghes_init(void) > { > int rc; > > if (acpi_disabled) > - return -ENODEV; > + return; > > switch (hest_disable) { > case HEST_NOT_FOUND: > - return -ENODEV; > + return; > case HEST_DISABLED: > pr_info(GHES_PFX "HEST is not enabled!\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return; > default: > break; > } > > if (ghes_disable) { > pr_info(GHES_PFX "GHES is not enabled!\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return; > } > > ghes_nmi_init_cxt(); > > rc = platform_driver_register(&ghes_platform_driver); > if (rc) > - goto err; > + return; > > rc = apei_osc_setup(); > if (rc == 0 && osc_sb_apei_support_acked) > @@ -1495,8 +1495,5 @@ static int __init ghes_init(void) > else > pr_info(GHES_PFX "Failed to enable APEI firmware first mode.\n"); > > - return 0; > -err: > - return rc; > + return; Unnecessary "return". > } > -device_initcall(ghes_init); > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > index 07f604832fd6..1dcd71df2cd5 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #include <linux/acpi_viot.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > #include <acpi/apei.h> > +#include <linux/arm_sdei.h> This "arm" looks a little out of place in this supposedly arch-generic code. Not really a new thing with this patch, since this #include already appears in drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c. Maybe it's unavoidable. > #include <linux/suspend.h> > #include <linux/prmt.h> > > @@ -1331,6 +1332,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void) > > pci_mmcfg_late_init(); > acpi_iort_init(); > + acpi_hest_init(); > + sdei_init(); > + ghes_init(); > acpi_scan_init(); > acpi_ec_init(); > acpi_debugfs_init(); > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > index b76db99cced3..6f9e75d14808 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/dmi.h> > #include <linux/platform_data/x86/apple.h> > -#include <acpi/apei.h> /* for acpi_hest_init() */ > - > #include "internal.h" > > #define ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS "pci_bridge" > @@ -943,7 +941,6 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root, > > void __init acpi_pci_root_init(void) > { > - acpi_hest_init(); > if (acpi_pci_disabled) > return; > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c > index a7e762c352f9..1e1a51510e83 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c > @@ -1059,14 +1059,14 @@ static bool __init sdei_present_acpi(void) > return true; > } > > -static int __init sdei_init(void) > +void __init sdei_init(void) > { > struct platform_device *pdev; > int ret; > > ret = platform_driver_register(&sdei_driver); > if (ret || !sdei_present_acpi()) > - return ret; > + return; > > pdev = platform_device_register_simple(sdei_driver.driver.name, > 0, NULL, 0); > @@ -1076,17 +1076,8 @@ static int __init sdei_init(void) > pr_info("Failed to register ACPI:SDEI platform device %d\n", > ret); > } > - > - return ret; > } > > -/* > - * On an ACPI system SDEI needs to be ready before HEST:GHES tries to register > - * its events. ACPI is initialised from a subsys_initcall(), GHES is initialised > - * by device_initcall(). We want to be called in the middle. > - */ > -subsys_initcall_sync(sdei_init); > - > int sdei_event_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, > struct sdei_registered_event *arg) > { > diff --git a/include/acpi/apei.h b/include/acpi/apei.h > index ece0a8af2bae..4e60dd73c3bb 100644 > --- a/include/acpi/apei.h > +++ b/include/acpi/apei.h > @@ -27,14 +27,16 @@ extern int hest_disable; > extern int erst_disable; > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES > extern bool ghes_disable; > +void __init ghes_init(void); > #else > #define ghes_disable 1 > +static inline void ghes_init(void) { } > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI > void __init acpi_hest_init(void); > #else > -static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { return; } > +static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { } > #endif > > int erst_write(const struct cper_record_header *record); > diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h > index 0a241c5c911d..14dc461b0e82 100644 > --- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h > +++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h > @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ int sdei_unregister_ghes(struct ghes *ghes); > /* For use by arch code when CPU hotplug notifiers are not appropriate. */ > int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void); > int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void); > +void __init sdei_init(void); > #else > static inline int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } > static inline int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } > +static inline void sdei_init(void) { } > #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE */ > > > -- > 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi, Bjorn, Thank you for your comments. 在 2022/1/21 AM12:22, Bjorn Helgaas 写道: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 01:05:22PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: >> From commit e147133a42cb ("ACPI / APEI: Make hest.c manage the estatus >> memory pool") was merged, ghes_init() relies on acpi_hest_init() to manage >> the estatus memory pool. On the other hand, ghes_init() relies on >> sdei_init() to detect the SDEI version and (un)register events. The >> dependencies are as follows: >> >> ghes_init() => acpi_hest_init() => acpi_bus_init() => acpi_init() >> ghes_init() => sdei_init() >> >> HEST is not PCI-specific and initcall ordering is implicit and not >> well-defined within a level. >> >> Based on above, remove acpi_hest_init() from acpi_pci_root_init() and >> convert ghes_init() and sdei_init() from initcalls to explicit calls in the >> following order: >> >> acpi_hest_init() >> sdei_init() >> ghes_init() >> >> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> > > I didn't suggest the approach; I just reviewed the patch and the > commit log and proposed moving it out of acpi_pci_root_init(). That > doesn't need to be acknowledged. I will delete it in next version :) >> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Will add this in next version. > Minor extra "return" below. >> --- >> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 17 +++++++---------- >> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 ++++ >> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 3 --- >> drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 13 ++----------- >> include/acpi/apei.h | 4 +++- >> include/linux/arm_sdei.h | 2 ++ >> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> index 0c5c9acc6254..bed4f10cfcb8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> @@ -1457,33 +1457,33 @@ static struct platform_driver ghes_platform_driver = { >> .remove = ghes_remove, >> }; >> >> -static int __init ghes_init(void) >> +void __init ghes_init(void) >> { >> int rc; >> >> if (acpi_disabled) >> - return -ENODEV; >> + return; >> >> switch (hest_disable) { >> case HEST_NOT_FOUND: >> - return -ENODEV; >> + return; >> case HEST_DISABLED: >> pr_info(GHES_PFX "HEST is not enabled!\n"); >> - return -EINVAL; >> + return; >> default: >> break; >> } >> >> if (ghes_disable) { >> pr_info(GHES_PFX "GHES is not enabled!\n"); >> - return -EINVAL; >> + return; >> } >> >> ghes_nmi_init_cxt(); >> >> rc = platform_driver_register(&ghes_platform_driver); >> if (rc) >> - goto err; >> + return; >> >> rc = apei_osc_setup(); >> if (rc == 0 && osc_sb_apei_support_acked) >> @@ -1495,8 +1495,5 @@ static int __init ghes_init(void) >> else >> pr_info(GHES_PFX "Failed to enable APEI firmware first mode.\n"); >> >> - return 0; >> -err: >> - return rc; >> + return; > > Unnecessary "return". Will fix it in next version. > >> } >> -device_initcall(ghes_init); >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >> index 07f604832fd6..1dcd71df2cd5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ >> #include <linux/acpi_viot.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> #include <acpi/apei.h> >> +#include <linux/arm_sdei.h> > > This "arm" looks a little out of place in this supposedly arch-generic > code. Not really a new thing with this patch, since this #include > already appears in drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c. Maybe it's unavoidable. Yep, should we move sdei_init() into the beginning of ghes_init()? > sdei_init() and ghes_init() stick out here because they're the only > functions without an "acpi_" prefix. Maybe a separate patch to rename > them? Sorry, I forgot to send a patch to rename them. I have a question about this. > Software Delegated Exception Interface (|SDEI|) is an Arm specification for > Non-secure world to register handlers with firmware to receive notifications > about system events. > LINK: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/docs/components/sdei.rst I think SDEI is not a ACPI Specification but Arm specification so we should not rename sdei_init() with an "acpi_" prefix. If we move sdei_init() into ghes_init(), and rename ghes_init() to acpi_ghes_init(), then all looks fine? What's your opinion, Bjorn? Best Regards. Shuai > >> #include <linux/suspend.h> >> #include <linux/prmt.h> >> >> @@ -1331,6 +1332,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void) >> >> pci_mmcfg_late_init(); >> acpi_iort_init(); >> + acpi_hest_init(); >> + sdei_init(); >> + ghes_init(); >> acpi_scan_init(); >> acpi_ec_init(); >> acpi_debugfs_init(); >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> index b76db99cced3..6f9e75d14808 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> #include <linux/dmi.h> >> #include <linux/platform_data/x86/apple.h> >> -#include <acpi/apei.h> /* for acpi_hest_init() */ >> - >> #include "internal.h" >> >> #define ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS "pci_bridge" >> @@ -943,7 +941,6 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root, >> >> void __init acpi_pci_root_init(void) >> { >> - acpi_hest_init(); >> if (acpi_pci_disabled) >> return; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c >> index a7e762c352f9..1e1a51510e83 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c >> @@ -1059,14 +1059,14 @@ static bool __init sdei_present_acpi(void) >> return true; >> } >> >> -static int __init sdei_init(void) >> +void __init sdei_init(void) >> { >> struct platform_device *pdev; >> int ret; >> >> ret = platform_driver_register(&sdei_driver); >> if (ret || !sdei_present_acpi()) >> - return ret; >> + return; >> >> pdev = platform_device_register_simple(sdei_driver.driver.name, >> 0, NULL, 0); >> @@ -1076,17 +1076,8 @@ static int __init sdei_init(void) >> pr_info("Failed to register ACPI:SDEI platform device %d\n", >> ret); >> } >> - >> - return ret; >> } >> >> -/* >> - * On an ACPI system SDEI needs to be ready before HEST:GHES tries to register >> - * its events. ACPI is initialised from a subsys_initcall(), GHES is initialised >> - * by device_initcall(). We want to be called in the middle. >> - */ >> -subsys_initcall_sync(sdei_init); >> - >> int sdei_event_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, >> struct sdei_registered_event *arg) >> { >> diff --git a/include/acpi/apei.h b/include/acpi/apei.h >> index ece0a8af2bae..4e60dd73c3bb 100644 >> --- a/include/acpi/apei.h >> +++ b/include/acpi/apei.h >> @@ -27,14 +27,16 @@ extern int hest_disable; >> extern int erst_disable; >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES >> extern bool ghes_disable; >> +void __init ghes_init(void); >> #else >> #define ghes_disable 1 >> +static inline void ghes_init(void) { } >> #endif >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI >> void __init acpi_hest_init(void); >> #else >> -static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { return; } >> +static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { } >> #endif >> >> int erst_write(const struct cper_record_header *record); >> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h >> index 0a241c5c911d..14dc461b0e82 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h >> +++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h >> @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ int sdei_unregister_ghes(struct ghes *ghes); >> /* For use by arch code when CPU hotplug notifiers are not appropriate. */ >> int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void); >> int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void); >> +void __init sdei_init(void); >> #else >> static inline int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } >> static inline int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } >> +static inline void sdei_init(void) { } >> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE */ >> >> >> -- >> 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:43:25AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: > 在 2022/1/21 AM12:22, Bjorn Helgaas 写道: > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 01:05:22PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: > >> From commit e147133a42cb ("ACPI / APEI: Make hest.c manage the estatus > >> memory pool") was merged, ghes_init() relies on acpi_hest_init() to manage > >> the estatus memory pool. On the other hand, ghes_init() relies on > >> sdei_init() to detect the SDEI version and (un)register events. The > >> dependencies are as follows: > >> > >> ghes_init() => acpi_hest_init() => acpi_bus_init() => acpi_init() > >> ghes_init() => sdei_init() > >> > >> HEST is not PCI-specific and initcall ordering is implicit and not > >> well-defined within a level. > >> > >> Based on above, remove acpi_hest_init() from acpi_pci_root_init() and > >> convert ghes_init() and sdei_init() from initcalls to explicit calls in the > >> following order: > >> > >> acpi_hest_init() > >> sdei_init() > >> ghes_init() > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > >> #include <linux/acpi_viot.h> > >> #include <linux/pci.h> > >> #include <acpi/apei.h> > >> +#include <linux/arm_sdei.h> > > > > This "arm" looks a little out of place in this supposedly arch-generic > > code. Not really a new thing with this patch, since this #include > > already appears in drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c. Maybe it's unavoidable. > > Yep, should we move sdei_init() into the beginning of ghes_init()? > ... > > Software Delegated Exception Interface (|SDEI|) is an Arm specification for > > Non-secure world to register handlers with firmware to receive notifications > > about system events. > > LINK: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/docs/components/sdei.rst > > I think SDEI is not a ACPI Specification but Arm specification so we should > not rename sdei_init() with an "acpi_" prefix. If we move sdei_init() into > ghes_init(), and rename ghes_init() to acpi_ghes_init(), then all looks > fine? What's your opinion, Bjorn? Makes sense to me, especially since drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c already includes linux/arm_sdei.h. This is Rafael's area. Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c index 0c5c9acc6254..bed4f10cfcb8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c @@ -1457,33 +1457,33 @@ static struct platform_driver ghes_platform_driver = { .remove = ghes_remove, }; -static int __init ghes_init(void) +void __init ghes_init(void) { int rc; if (acpi_disabled) - return -ENODEV; + return; switch (hest_disable) { case HEST_NOT_FOUND: - return -ENODEV; + return; case HEST_DISABLED: pr_info(GHES_PFX "HEST is not enabled!\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return; default: break; } if (ghes_disable) { pr_info(GHES_PFX "GHES is not enabled!\n"); - return -EINVAL; + return; } ghes_nmi_init_cxt(); rc = platform_driver_register(&ghes_platform_driver); if (rc) - goto err; + return; rc = apei_osc_setup(); if (rc == 0 && osc_sb_apei_support_acked) @@ -1495,8 +1495,5 @@ static int __init ghes_init(void) else pr_info(GHES_PFX "Failed to enable APEI firmware first mode.\n"); - return 0; -err: - return rc; + return; } -device_initcall(ghes_init); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index 07f604832fd6..1dcd71df2cd5 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #include <linux/acpi_viot.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <acpi/apei.h> +#include <linux/arm_sdei.h> #include <linux/suspend.h> #include <linux/prmt.h> @@ -1331,6 +1332,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void) pci_mmcfg_late_init(); acpi_iort_init(); + acpi_hest_init(); + sdei_init(); + ghes_init(); acpi_scan_init(); acpi_ec_init(); acpi_debugfs_init(); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c index b76db99cced3..6f9e75d14808 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/dmi.h> #include <linux/platform_data/x86/apple.h> -#include <acpi/apei.h> /* for acpi_hest_init() */ - #include "internal.h" #define ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS "pci_bridge" @@ -943,7 +941,6 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root, void __init acpi_pci_root_init(void) { - acpi_hest_init(); if (acpi_pci_disabled) return; diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c index a7e762c352f9..1e1a51510e83 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c @@ -1059,14 +1059,14 @@ static bool __init sdei_present_acpi(void) return true; } -static int __init sdei_init(void) +void __init sdei_init(void) { struct platform_device *pdev; int ret; ret = platform_driver_register(&sdei_driver); if (ret || !sdei_present_acpi()) - return ret; + return; pdev = platform_device_register_simple(sdei_driver.driver.name, 0, NULL, 0); @@ -1076,17 +1076,8 @@ static int __init sdei_init(void) pr_info("Failed to register ACPI:SDEI platform device %d\n", ret); } - - return ret; } -/* - * On an ACPI system SDEI needs to be ready before HEST:GHES tries to register - * its events. ACPI is initialised from a subsys_initcall(), GHES is initialised - * by device_initcall(). We want to be called in the middle. - */ -subsys_initcall_sync(sdei_init); - int sdei_event_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sdei_registered_event *arg) { diff --git a/include/acpi/apei.h b/include/acpi/apei.h index ece0a8af2bae..4e60dd73c3bb 100644 --- a/include/acpi/apei.h +++ b/include/acpi/apei.h @@ -27,14 +27,16 @@ extern int hest_disable; extern int erst_disable; #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES extern bool ghes_disable; +void __init ghes_init(void); #else #define ghes_disable 1 +static inline void ghes_init(void) { } #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI void __init acpi_hest_init(void); #else -static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { return; } +static inline void acpi_hest_init(void) { } #endif int erst_write(const struct cper_record_header *record); diff --git a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h index 0a241c5c911d..14dc461b0e82 100644 --- a/include/linux/arm_sdei.h +++ b/include/linux/arm_sdei.h @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ int sdei_unregister_ghes(struct ghes *ghes); /* For use by arch code when CPU hotplug notifiers are not appropriate. */ int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void); int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void); +void __init sdei_init(void); #else static inline int sdei_mask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } static inline int sdei_unmask_local_cpu(void) { return 0; } +static inline void sdei_init(void) { } #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE */
From commit e147133a42cb ("ACPI / APEI: Make hest.c manage the estatus memory pool") was merged, ghes_init() relies on acpi_hest_init() to manage the estatus memory pool. On the other hand, ghes_init() relies on sdei_init() to detect the SDEI version and (un)register events. The dependencies are as follows: ghes_init() => acpi_hest_init() => acpi_bus_init() => acpi_init() ghes_init() => sdei_init() HEST is not PCI-specific and initcall ordering is implicit and not well-defined within a level. Based on above, remove acpi_hest_init() from acpi_pci_root_init() and convert ghes_init() and sdei_init() from initcalls to explicit calls in the following order: acpi_hest_init() sdei_init() ghes_init() Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 17 +++++++---------- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 4 ++++ drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 3 --- drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c | 13 ++----------- include/acpi/apei.h | 4 +++- include/linux/arm_sdei.h | 2 ++ 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)