| Message ID | 1643106363-20246-1-git-send-email-baowen.zheng@corigine.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | David Ahern |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [iproute2-next,v1] tc: add skip_hw and skip_sw to control action offload | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
Hi Baowen, I applied your patch, ran tdc.sh and in particular the vlan tests broke. cheers, Victor On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:35 AM Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@corigine.com> wrote: > > Add skip_hw and skip_sw flags for user to control whether > offload action to hardware. > > Also we add hw_count to show how many hardwares accept to offload > the action. > > Change man page to describe the usage of skip_sw and skip_hw flag. > > An example to add and query action as below. > > $ tc actions add action police rate 1mbit burst 100k index 100 skip_sw > > $ tc -s -d actions list action police > total acts 1 > action order 0: police 0x64 rate 1Mbit burst 100Kb mtu 2Kb action reclassify overhead 0b linklayer ethernet > ref 1 bind 0 installed 2 sec used 2 sec > Action statistics: > Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > skip_sw in_hw in_hw_count 1 > used_hw_stats delayed > > Signed-off-by: baowen zheng <baowen.zheng@corigine.com> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> > --- > man/man8/tc-actions.8 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++ > tc/m_action.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 > index 6f1c201..5c399cd 100644 > --- a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 > +++ b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ actions \- independently defined actions in tc > .I HWSTATSSPEC > ] [ > .I CONTROL > +] [ > +.I SKIPSPEC > ] > > .I ACTISPEC > @@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ Time since last update. > .IR reclassify " | " pipe " | " drop " | " continue " | " ok > } > > +.I SKIPSPEC > +:= { > +.IR skip_sw " | " skip_hw > +} > + > .I TC_OPTIONS > These are the options that are specific to > .B tc > @@ -270,6 +277,23 @@ Return to the calling qdisc for packet processing, and end classification of > this packet. > .RE > > +.TP > +.I SKIPSPEC > +The > +.I SKIPSPEC > +indicates how > +.B tc > +should proceed when executing the action. Any of the following are valid: > +.RS > +.TP > +.B skip_sw > +Do not process action by software. If hardware has no offload support for this > +action, operation will fail. > +.TP > +.B skip_hw > +Do not process action by hardware. > +.RE > + > .SH SEE ALSO > .BR tc (8), > .BR tc-bpf (8), > diff --git a/tc/m_action.c b/tc/m_action.c > index b16882a..b9fed6f 100644 > --- a/tc/m_action.c > +++ b/tc/m_action.c > @@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ static void act_usage(void) > " FL := ls | list | flush | <ACTNAMESPEC>\n" > " ACTNAMESPEC := action <ACTNAME>\n" > " ACTISPEC := <ACTNAMESPEC> <INDEXSPEC>\n" > - " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] [HWSTATSSPEC]\n" > + " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] [HWSTATSSPEC] [SKIPSPEC]\n" > " INDEXSPEC := index <32 bit indexvalue>\n" > " HWSTATSSPEC := hw_stats [ immediate | delayed | disabled ]\n" > + " SKIPSPEC := [ skip_sw | skip_hw ]\n" > " ACTDETAIL := <ACTNAME> <ACTPARAMS>\n" > " Example ACTNAME is gact, mirred, bpf, etc\n" > " Each action has its own parameters (ACTPARAMS)\n" > @@ -210,12 +211,14 @@ int parse_action(int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, int tca_id, struct nlmsghdr *n) > struct rtattr *tail, *tail2; > char k[FILTER_NAMESZ]; > int act_ck_len = 0; > + __u32 flag = 0; > int ok = 0; > int eap = 0; /* expect action parameters */ > > int ret = 0; > int prio = 0; > unsigned char act_ck[TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE]; > + int skip_loop = 2; > > if (argc <= 0) > return -1; > @@ -314,13 +317,27 @@ done0: > } > > if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "no_percpu") == 0) { > + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS; > + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); > + } > + > + /* we need to parse twice to fix skip flag out of order */ > + while (skip_loop--) { > + if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_sw") == 0) { > + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW; > + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); > + } else if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_hw") == 0) { > + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW; > + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); > + } > + } > + > + if (flag) { > struct nla_bitfield32 flags = > - { TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS, > - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS }; > + { flag, flag }; > > addattr_l(n, MAX_MSG, TCA_ACT_FLAGS, &flags, > sizeof(struct nla_bitfield32)); > - NEXT_ARG_FWD(); > } > > addattr_nest_end(n, tail); > @@ -396,13 +413,39 @@ static int tc_print_one_action(FILE *f, struct rtattr *arg) > strsz, b1, sizeof(b1))); > print_nl(); > } > - if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { > - struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); > + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS] || tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]) { > + bool skip_hw = false; > + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { > + struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); > + > + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) > + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", > + flags->value & > + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); > + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW) { > + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_hw", "\tskip_hw", > + flags->value & > + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); > + skip_hw = !!(flags->value & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); > + } > + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW) > + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_sw", "\tskip_sw", > + flags->value & > + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW); > + } > + if (tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT] && !skip_hw) { > + __u32 count = rta_getattr_u32(tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]); > + if (count) { > + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw", "\tin_hw", > + true); > + print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw_count", > + " in_hw_count %u", count); > + } else { > + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "not_in_hw", > + "\tnot_in_hw", true); > + } > + } > > - if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) > - print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", > - flags->value & > - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); > print_nl(); > } > if (tb[TCA_ACT_HW_STATS]) > -- > 1.8.3.1 >
Hi Victor, thanks very much to bring this issue to us, we will make a check and fix this issue in next patch. On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:23 PM, Victor wrote: >Hi Baowen, > >I applied your patch, ran tdc.sh and in particular the vlan tests broke. > >cheers, >Victor > >On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:35 AM Baowen Zheng ><baowen.zheng@corigine.com> wrote: >> >> Add skip_hw and skip_sw flags for user to control whether offload >> action to hardware. >> >> Also we add hw_count to show how many hardwares accept to offload the >> action. >> >> Change man page to describe the usage of skip_sw and skip_hw flag. >> >> An example to add and query action as below. >> >> $ tc actions add action police rate 1mbit burst 100k index 100 skip_sw >> >> $ tc -s -d actions list action police >> total acts 1 >> action order 0: police 0x64 rate 1Mbit burst 100Kb mtu 2Kb action >reclassify overhead 0b linklayer ethernet >> ref 1 bind 0 installed 2 sec used 2 sec >> Action statistics: >> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) >> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 >> skip_sw in_hw in_hw_count 1 >> used_hw_stats delayed >> >> Signed-off-by: baowen zheng <baowen.zheng@corigine.com> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> >> --- >> man/man8/tc-actions.8 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> tc/m_action.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >------- >> 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 index >> 6f1c201..5c399cd 100644 >> --- a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 >> +++ b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 >> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ actions \- independently defined actions in tc .I >> HWSTATSSPEC ] [ .I CONTROL >> +] [ >> +.I SKIPSPEC >> ] >> >> .I ACTISPEC >> @@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ Time since last update. >> .IR reclassify " | " pipe " | " drop " | " continue " | " ok } >> >> +.I SKIPSPEC >> +:= { >> +.IR skip_sw " | " skip_hw >> +} >> + >> .I TC_OPTIONS >> These are the options that are specific to .B tc @@ -270,6 +277,23 >> @@ Return to the calling qdisc for packet processing, and end >> classification of this packet. >> .RE >> >> +.TP >> +.I SKIPSPEC >> +The >> +.I SKIPSPEC >> +indicates how >> +.B tc >> +should proceed when executing the action. Any of the following are valid: >> +.RS >> +.TP >> +.B skip_sw >> +Do not process action by software. If hardware has no offload support >> +for this action, operation will fail. >> +.TP >> +.B skip_hw >> +Do not process action by hardware. >> +.RE >> + >> .SH SEE ALSO >> .BR tc (8), >> .BR tc-bpf (8), >> diff --git a/tc/m_action.c b/tc/m_action.c index b16882a..b9fed6f >> 100644 >> --- a/tc/m_action.c >> +++ b/tc/m_action.c >> @@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ static void act_usage(void) >> " FL := ls | list | flush | <ACTNAMESPEC>\n" >> " ACTNAMESPEC := action <ACTNAME>\n" >> " ACTISPEC := <ACTNAMESPEC> <INDEXSPEC>\n" >> - " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] >[HWSTATSSPEC]\n" >> + " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] [HWSTATSSPEC] >[SKIPSPEC]\n" >> " INDEXSPEC := index <32 bit indexvalue>\n" >> " HWSTATSSPEC := hw_stats [ immediate | delayed | >disabled ]\n" >> + " SKIPSPEC := [ skip_sw | skip_hw ]\n" >> " ACTDETAIL := <ACTNAME> <ACTPARAMS>\n" >> " Example ACTNAME is gact, mirred, bpf, etc\n" >> " Each action has its own parameters (ACTPARAMS)\n" >> @@ -210,12 +211,14 @@ int parse_action(int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, int >tca_id, struct nlmsghdr *n) >> struct rtattr *tail, *tail2; >> char k[FILTER_NAMESZ]; >> int act_ck_len = 0; >> + __u32 flag = 0; >> int ok = 0; >> int eap = 0; /* expect action parameters */ >> >> int ret = 0; >> int prio = 0; >> unsigned char act_ck[TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE]; >> + int skip_loop = 2; >> >> if (argc <= 0) >> return -1; >> @@ -314,13 +317,27 @@ done0: >> } >> >> if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "no_percpu") == 0) >> { >> + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS; >> + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); >> + } >> + >> + /* we need to parse twice to fix skip flag out of order */ >> + while (skip_loop--) { >> + if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_sw") == 0) { >> + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW; >> + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); >> + } else if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_hw") == 0) { >> + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW; >> + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); >> + } >> + } >> + >> + if (flag) { >> struct nla_bitfield32 flags = >> - { TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS, >> - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS }; >> + { flag, flag }; >> >> addattr_l(n, MAX_MSG, TCA_ACT_FLAGS, &flags, >> sizeof(struct nla_bitfield32)); >> - NEXT_ARG_FWD(); >> } >> >> addattr_nest_end(n, tail); @@ -396,13 +413,39 >> @@ static int tc_print_one_action(FILE *f, struct rtattr *arg) >> strsz, b1, sizeof(b1))); >> print_nl(); >> } >> - if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { >> - struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); >> + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS] || tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]) { >> + bool skip_hw = false; >> + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { >> + struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = >> + RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); >> + >> + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) >> + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", >> + flags->value & >> + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); >> + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW) { >> + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_hw", "\tskip_hw", >> + flags->value & >> + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); >> + skip_hw = !!(flags->value & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); >> + } >> + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW) >> + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_sw", "\tskip_sw", >> + flags->value & >> + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW); >> + } >> + if (tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT] && !skip_hw) { >> + __u32 count = rta_getattr_u32(tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]); >> + if (count) { >> + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw", "\tin_hw", >> + true); >> + print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw_count", >> + " in_hw_count %u", count); >> + } else { >> + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "not_in_hw", >> + "\tnot_in_hw", true); >> + } >> + } >> >> - if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) >> - print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", >> - flags->value & >> - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); >> print_nl(); >> } >> if (tb[TCA_ACT_HW_STATS]) >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >>
Hi Baowen, I didnt follow what "next patch" means because just prior to this email you sent a v2. As a general rule: You have to run the tdc tests and if your iproute2 patch is breaking something that was working fine before your patch then it needs to be fixed first. Perhaps thats what you meant is your v2 fixes the vlan breakage. cheers, jamal On 2022-01-26 03:14, Baowen Zheng wrote: > Hi Victor, thanks very much to bring this issue to us, we will make a check and fix this issue in next patch. > > On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:23 PM, Victor wrote: >> Hi Baowen, >> >> I applied your patch, ran tdc.sh and in particular the vlan tests broke. >> >> cheers, >> Victor
Hi Jamal, Sorry I did make myself clear, I mean our V2 patch will fix the vlan breakage issue, I should send this mail before I send the V2 patch. Thanks for clarification about the rule, I run the tdc test before the V2 patch to be sent. On Wednesday, January 26, 2022 7:58 PM, Jamal: >Hi Baowen, >I didnt follow what "next patch" means because just prior to this email you >sent a v2. > >As a general rule: >You have to run the tdc tests and if your iproute2 patch is breaking something >that was working fine before your patch then it needs to be fixed first. >Perhaps thats what you meant is your v2 fixes the vlan breakage. > >cheers, >jamal > >On 2022-01-26 03:14, Baowen Zheng wrote: >> Hi Victor, thanks very much to bring this issue to us, we will make a check >and fix this issue in next patch. >> >> On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:23 PM, Victor wrote: >>> Hi Baowen, >>> >>> I applied your patch, ran tdc.sh and in particular the vlan tests broke. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Victor
diff --git a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 index 6f1c201..5c399cd 100644 --- a/man/man8/tc-actions.8 +++ b/man/man8/tc-actions.8 @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ actions \- independently defined actions in tc .I HWSTATSSPEC ] [ .I CONTROL +] [ +.I SKIPSPEC ] .I ACTISPEC @@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ Time since last update. .IR reclassify " | " pipe " | " drop " | " continue " | " ok } +.I SKIPSPEC +:= { +.IR skip_sw " | " skip_hw +} + .I TC_OPTIONS These are the options that are specific to .B tc @@ -270,6 +277,23 @@ Return to the calling qdisc for packet processing, and end classification of this packet. .RE +.TP +.I SKIPSPEC +The +.I SKIPSPEC +indicates how +.B tc +should proceed when executing the action. Any of the following are valid: +.RS +.TP +.B skip_sw +Do not process action by software. If hardware has no offload support for this +action, operation will fail. +.TP +.B skip_hw +Do not process action by hardware. +.RE + .SH SEE ALSO .BR tc (8), .BR tc-bpf (8), diff --git a/tc/m_action.c b/tc/m_action.c index b16882a..b9fed6f 100644 --- a/tc/m_action.c +++ b/tc/m_action.c @@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ static void act_usage(void) " FL := ls | list | flush | <ACTNAMESPEC>\n" " ACTNAMESPEC := action <ACTNAME>\n" " ACTISPEC := <ACTNAMESPEC> <INDEXSPEC>\n" - " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] [HWSTATSSPEC]\n" + " ACTSPEC := action <ACTDETAIL> [INDEXSPEC] [HWSTATSSPEC] [SKIPSPEC]\n" " INDEXSPEC := index <32 bit indexvalue>\n" " HWSTATSSPEC := hw_stats [ immediate | delayed | disabled ]\n" + " SKIPSPEC := [ skip_sw | skip_hw ]\n" " ACTDETAIL := <ACTNAME> <ACTPARAMS>\n" " Example ACTNAME is gact, mirred, bpf, etc\n" " Each action has its own parameters (ACTPARAMS)\n" @@ -210,12 +211,14 @@ int parse_action(int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, int tca_id, struct nlmsghdr *n) struct rtattr *tail, *tail2; char k[FILTER_NAMESZ]; int act_ck_len = 0; + __u32 flag = 0; int ok = 0; int eap = 0; /* expect action parameters */ int ret = 0; int prio = 0; unsigned char act_ck[TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE]; + int skip_loop = 2; if (argc <= 0) return -1; @@ -314,13 +317,27 @@ done0: } if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "no_percpu") == 0) { + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS; + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); + } + + /* we need to parse twice to fix skip flag out of order */ + while (skip_loop--) { + if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_sw") == 0) { + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW; + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); + } else if (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "skip_hw") == 0) { + flag |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW; + NEXT_ARG_FWD(); + } + } + + if (flag) { struct nla_bitfield32 flags = - { TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS, - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS }; + { flag, flag }; addattr_l(n, MAX_MSG, TCA_ACT_FLAGS, &flags, sizeof(struct nla_bitfield32)); - NEXT_ARG_FWD(); } addattr_nest_end(n, tail); @@ -396,13 +413,39 @@ static int tc_print_one_action(FILE *f, struct rtattr *arg) strsz, b1, sizeof(b1))); print_nl(); } - if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { - struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS] || tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]) { + bool skip_hw = false; + if (tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]) { + struct nla_bitfield32 *flags = RTA_DATA(tb[TCA_ACT_FLAGS]); + + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", + flags->value & + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW) { + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_hw", "\tskip_hw", + flags->value & + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); + skip_hw = !!(flags->value & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_HW); + } + if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW) + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "skip_sw", "\tskip_sw", + flags->value & + TCA_ACT_FLAGS_SKIP_SW); + } + if (tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT] && !skip_hw) { + __u32 count = rta_getattr_u32(tb[TCA_ACT_IN_HW_COUNT]); + if (count) { + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw", "\tin_hw", + true); + print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "in_hw_count", + " in_hw_count %u", count); + } else { + print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "not_in_hw", + "\tnot_in_hw", true); + } + } - if (flags->selector & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS) - print_bool(PRINT_ANY, "no_percpu", "\tno_percpu", - flags->value & - TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_PERCPU_STATS); print_nl(); } if (tb[TCA_ACT_HW_STATS])
Add skip_hw and skip_sw flags for user to control whether offload action to hardware. Also we add hw_count to show how many hardwares accept to offload the action. Change man page to describe the usage of skip_sw and skip_hw flag. An example to add and query action as below. $ tc actions add action police rate 1mbit burst 100k index 100 skip_sw $ tc -s -d actions list action police total acts 1 action order 0: police 0x64 rate 1Mbit burst 100Kb mtu 2Kb action reclassify overhead 0b linklayer ethernet ref 1 bind 0 installed 2 sec used 2 sec Action statistics: Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 skip_sw in_hw in_hw_count 1 used_hw_stats delayed Signed-off-by: baowen zheng <baowen.zheng@corigine.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> --- man/man8/tc-actions.8 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++ tc/m_action.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)