diff mbox series

[RFC] failing selftests/bpf/test_offload.py

Message ID 20220130225101.47514-1-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [RFC] failing selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next success VM_Test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Jan. 30, 2022, 10:51 p.m. UTC
hi,
I have failing test_offload.py with following output:

  # ./test_offload.py
  ...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
  FAIL: 3 BPF maps loaded, expected 2
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1177, in <module>
      check_dev_info(False, "")
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 645, in check_dev_info
      maps = bpftool_map_list(expected=2, ns=ns)
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 190, in bpftool_map_list
      fail(True, "%d BPF maps loaded, expected %d" %
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
      tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())

it fails to detect maps from bpftool's feature detection,
that did not make it yet through deferred removal

with the fix below I have this subtest passed, but it fails
further on:

  # ./test_offload.py
  ...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (other ns)...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (remote ns)...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (back to own ns)...
  Test bpftool bound info reporting (removed dev)...
  Test map update (no flags)...
  Test map update (exists)...
  Test map update (noexist)...
  Test map dump...
  Test map dump...
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1251, in <module>
      _, entries = bpftool("map dump id %d" % (m["id"]))
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 169, in bpftool
      return tool("bpftool", args, {"json":"-p"}, JSON=JSON, ns=ns,
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 155, in tool
      ret, stdout = cmd(ns + name + " " + params + args,
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 109, in cmd
      return cmd_result(proc, include_stderr=include_stderr, fail=fail)
    File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 131, in cmd_result
      raise Exception("Command failed: %s\n%s" % (proc.args, stderr))
  Exception: Command failed: bpftool -p map dump id 4325

the test seems to expect maps having BTF loaded, which for some reason
did not happen, so the test fails with bpftool pretty dump fail

the test loads the object with 'ip link ...', which I never touched,
so I wanted ask first before I dive in, perhaps I miss some setup

thoughts? ;-)

thanks,
jirka
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                      | 6 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Jan. 31, 2022, 1:15 p.m. UTC | #1
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes:

> hi,
> I have failing test_offload.py with following output:
>
>   # ./test_offload.py
>   ...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
>   FAIL: 3 BPF maps loaded, expected 2
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1177, in <module>
>       check_dev_info(False, "")
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 645, in check_dev_info
>       maps = bpftool_map_list(expected=2, ns=ns)
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 190, in bpftool_map_list
>       fail(True, "%d BPF maps loaded, expected %d" %
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
>       tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
>
> it fails to detect maps from bpftool's feature detection,
> that did not make it yet through deferred removal
>
> with the fix below I have this subtest passed, but it fails
> further on:
>
>   # ./test_offload.py
>   ...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (other ns)...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (remote ns)...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (back to own ns)...
>   Test bpftool bound info reporting (removed dev)...
>   Test map update (no flags)...
>   Test map update (exists)...
>   Test map update (noexist)...
>   Test map dump...
>   Test map dump...
>   Traceback (most recent call last):
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1251, in <module>
>       _, entries = bpftool("map dump id %d" % (m["id"]))
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 169, in bpftool
>       return tool("bpftool", args, {"json":"-p"}, JSON=JSON, ns=ns,
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 155, in tool
>       ret, stdout = cmd(ns + name + " " + params + args,
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 109, in cmd
>       return cmd_result(proc, include_stderr=include_stderr, fail=fail)
>     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 131, in cmd_result
>       raise Exception("Command failed: %s\n%s" % (proc.args, stderr))
>   Exception: Command failed: bpftool -p map dump id 4325
>
> the test seems to expect maps having BTF loaded, which for some reason
> did not happen, so the test fails with bpftool pretty dump fail
>
> the test loads the object with 'ip link ...', which I never touched,
> so I wanted ask first before I dive in, perhaps I miss some setup
>
> thoughts? ;-)

It looks like the test_offload.py has been using 'bpftool -p' since its
inception (in commit: 417ec26477a5 ("selftests/bpf: add offload test
based on netdevsim") introduced in December 2017), so this sounds like a
regression in bpftool?

-Toke
Jiri Olsa Feb. 4, 2022, 3:20 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > hi,
> > I have failing test_offload.py with following output:
> >
> >   # ./test_offload.py
> >   ...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
> >   FAIL: 3 BPF maps loaded, expected 2
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1177, in <module>
> >       check_dev_info(False, "")
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 645, in check_dev_info
> >       maps = bpftool_map_list(expected=2, ns=ns)
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 190, in bpftool_map_list
> >       fail(True, "%d BPF maps loaded, expected %d" %
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
> >       tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
> >
> > it fails to detect maps from bpftool's feature detection,
> > that did not make it yet through deferred removal
> >
> > with the fix below I have this subtest passed, but it fails
> > further on:
> >
> >   # ./test_offload.py
> >   ...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (own ns)...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (other ns)...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (remote ns)...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (back to own ns)...
> >   Test bpftool bound info reporting (removed dev)...
> >   Test map update (no flags)...
> >   Test map update (exists)...
> >   Test map update (noexist)...
> >   Test map dump...
> >   Test map dump...
> >   Traceback (most recent call last):
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 1251, in <module>
> >       _, entries = bpftool("map dump id %d" % (m["id"]))
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 169, in bpftool
> >       return tool("bpftool", args, {"json":"-p"}, JSON=JSON, ns=ns,
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 155, in tool
> >       ret, stdout = cmd(ns + name + " " + params + args,
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 109, in cmd
> >       return cmd_result(proc, include_stderr=include_stderr, fail=fail)
> >     File "/root/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/./test_offload.py", line 131, in cmd_result
> >       raise Exception("Command failed: %s\n%s" % (proc.args, stderr))
> >   Exception: Command failed: bpftool -p map dump id 4325
> >
> > the test seems to expect maps having BTF loaded, which for some reason
> > did not happen, so the test fails with bpftool pretty dump fail
> >
> > the test loads the object with 'ip link ...', which I never touched,
> > so I wanted ask first before I dive in, perhaps I miss some setup
> >
> > thoughts? ;-)
> 
> It looks like the test_offload.py has been using 'bpftool -p' since its
> inception (in commit: 417ec26477a5 ("selftests/bpf: add offload test
> based on netdevsim") introduced in December 2017), so this sounds like a
> regression in bpftool?
> 
> -Toke
> 

right, looks like this commit:
  e5043894b21f ("bpftool: Use libbpf_get_error() to check error")

forced btf for pretty map dump.. change below fixes the test for me,
I'll send full patchset for this later

thanks,
jirka


---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index c66a3c979b7a..2ccf85042e75 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ map_dump(int fd, struct bpf_map_info *info, json_writer_t *wtr,
 	prev_key = NULL;
 
 	if (wtr) {
+		errno = 0;
 		btf = get_map_kv_btf(info);
 		err = libbpf_get_error(btf);
 		if (err) {
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 4ce94f4ed34a..881c88eceed0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4407,7 +4407,7 @@  static int probe_kern_global_data(void)
 	};
 	int ret, map, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
 
-	map = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, sizeof(int), 32, 1, NULL);
+	map = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "global_data", sizeof(int), 32, 1, NULL);
 	if (map < 0) {
 		ret = -errno;
 		cp = libbpf_strerror_r(ret, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
@@ -4540,7 +4540,7 @@  static int probe_kern_array_mmap(void)
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts, .map_flags = BPF_F_MMAPABLE);
 	int fd;
 
-	fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1, &opts);
+	fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "array_mmap", sizeof(int), sizeof(int), 1, &opts);
 	return probe_fd(fd);
 }
 
@@ -4587,7 +4587,7 @@  static int probe_prog_bind_map(void)
 	};
 	int ret, map, prog, insn_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insns);
 
-	map = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, sizeof(int), 32, 1, NULL);
+	map = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "bind_map_detect", sizeof(int), 32, 1, NULL);
 	if (map < 0) {
 		ret = -errno;
 		cp = libbpf_strerror_r(ret, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py
index edaffd43da83..0cf93d246804 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_offload.py
@@ -769,7 +769,11 @@  skip(ret != 0, "bpftool not installed")
 base_progs = progs
 _, base_maps = bpftool("map")
 base_map_names = [
-    'pid_iter.rodata' # created on each bpftool invocation
+    # created on each bpftool invocation
+    'pid_iter.rodata',
+    'bind_map_detect',
+    'global_data',
+    'array_mmap',
 ]
 
 # Check netdevsim