| Message ID | 20220210203049.67249-1-sherry.yang@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] selftests/seccomp: Fix seccomp failure by adding missing headers | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:30:49PM -0800, Sherry Yang wrote: > seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty > and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's > tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old > kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is > required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install > headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is > usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories > to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as > the real kernel headers directories are. > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> Thanks! Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
On 2/10/22 2:16 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:30:49PM -0800, Sherry Yang wrote: >> seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty >> and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's >> tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old >> kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is >> required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install >> headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is >> usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories >> to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as >> the real kernel headers directories are. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > > Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > Thank you. I will queue this up for rc5. thanks, -- Shuah
On 2/11/22 1:30 AM, Sherry Yang wrote: > seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty > and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's > tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old > kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is > required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install > headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is > usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories > to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as > the real kernel headers directories are. > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > Tested-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > index 0ebfe8b0e147..585f7a0c10cb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > -CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall > +CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/"../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion easy and correct for other build combinations as well?
On 2/11/22 1:30 AM, Sherry Yang wrote: > seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty > and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's > tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old > kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is > required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install > headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is > usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories > to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as > the real kernel headers directories are. > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > Tested-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > index 0ebfe8b0e147..585f7a0c10cb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > -CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall > +CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/ "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion easy and correct for other build combinations as well?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 04:14:17AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > On 2/11/22 1:30 AM, Sherry Yang wrote: > > seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty > > and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's > > tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old > > kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is > > required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install > > headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is > > usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories > > to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as > > the real kernel headers directories are. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > > Tested-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > > index 0ebfe8b0e147..585f7a0c10cb 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > -CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall > > +CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/ > > "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if > different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C > tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added > variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion > easy and correct for other build combinations as well? Ah, if that's true I think there are some other instances in the tree that need fixing too.
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 3:14 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote: > > On 2/11/22 1:30 AM, Sherry Yang wrote: >> seccomp_bpf failed on tests 47 global.user_notification_filter_empty >> and 48 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded when it's >> tested on updated kernel but with old kernel headers. Because old >> kernel headers don't have definition of macro __NR_clone3 which is >> required for these two tests. Since under selftests/, we can install >> headers once for all tests (the default INSTALL_HDR_PATH is >> usr/include), fix it by adding usr/include to the list of directories >> to be searched. Use "-isystem" to indicate it's a system directory as >> the real kernel headers directories are. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> >> Tested-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile >> index 0ebfe8b0e147..585f7a0c10cb 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> -CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall >> +CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/ > > "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if > different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C > tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added > variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion > easy and correct for other build combinations as well? > > Hi Muhammad, I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However, my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/ According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path (KHDR_INCLUDES) without “-I”? Thanks, Sherry
>> "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if >> different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C >> tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added >> variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion >> easy and correct for other build combinations as well? >> >> > > Hi Muhammad, > > I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice > work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However, > my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using > -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to > https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/ > > According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path > (KHDR_INCLUDES) without “-I”? Well said. I've thought about it and it seems like -isystem is better than -I. I've sent a patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220214160756.3543590-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/ I'm looking forward to discussion on it. Thanks, Usama
On 2/14/22 9:12 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>> "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if >>> different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C >>> tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added >>> variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion >>> easy and correct for other build combinations as well? >>> >>> >> >> Hi Muhammad, >> >> I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice >> work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However, >> my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using >> -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/ >> >> According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path >> (KHDR_INCLUDES) without “-I”? > Well said. I've thought about it and it seems like -isystem is better > than -I. I've sent a patch: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220214160756.3543590-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/ > I'm looking forward to discussion on it. The patch has been accepted. It should appear in linux-next soon. You should be able to use KHDR_INCLUDES easily now. Thanks, Usama
On 2/15/22 11:17 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > On 2/14/22 9:12 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>> "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if >>>> different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C >>>> tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added >>>> variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion >>>> easy and correct for other build combinations as well? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hi Muhammad, >>> >>> I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice >>> work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However, >>> my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using >>> -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/ >>> >>> According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path >>> (KHDR_INCLUDES) without “-I”? >> Well said. I've thought about it and it seems like -isystem is better >> than -I. I've sent a patch: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220214160756.3543590-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/ >> I'm looking forward to discussion on it. > The patch has been accepted. It should appear in linux-next soon. You > should be able to use KHDR_INCLUDES easily now. > Sherry, I pulled in your patch as a fix as is for 5.17-rc5. Using KHDR_INCLUDES can be separate patch for next release. This way the fix is going to be pulled for this release without dependencies on other patches. thanks, -- Shuah
> On Feb 15, 2022, at 10:43 AM, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On 2/15/22 11:17 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 2/14/22 9:12 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>>>> "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if >>>>> different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C >>>>> tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added >>>>> variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion >>>>> easy and correct for other build combinations as well? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Muhammad, >>>> >>>> I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice >>>> work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However, >>>> my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using >>>> -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!e4ajMH2HRzLNZZDe3Z1iqAO7L8SVjqnvp-a5NfT6I-mKD59xjA-zHM8TAfkJM1Udcg$ >>>> According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path >>>> (KHDR_INCLUDES) without “-I”? >>> Well said. I've thought about it and it seems like -isystem is better >>> than -I. I've sent a patch: >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220214160756.3543590-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!e4ajMH2HRzLNZZDe3Z1iqAO7L8SVjqnvp-a5NfT6I-mKD59xjA-zHM8TAfk0AVSbFg$ I'm looking forward to discussion on it. >> The patch has been accepted. It should appear in linux-next soon. You >> should be able to use KHDR_INCLUDES easily now. > > Sherry, > > I pulled in your patch as a fix as is for 5.17-rc5. > > Using KHDR_INCLUDES can be separate patch for next release. > This way the fix is going to be pulled for this release > without dependencies on other patches. > > thanks, > -- Shuah Oh, I just sent out v3 patch before I received the updates. Okay, I will send a separate patch with KHDR_INCLUDES later. Thanks, Sherry
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile index 0ebfe8b0e147..585f7a0c10cb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall +CFLAGS += -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/ LDFLAGS += -lpthread TEST_GEN_PROGS := seccomp_bpf seccomp_benchmark