Message ID | 20220211061158.227688-2-ebiggers@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | make statx() return I/O alignment information | expand |
On 2/10/22 10:11 PM, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > > Traditionally, the conditions for when DIO (direct I/O) is supported > were fairly simple: filesystems either supported DIO aligned to the > block device's logical block size, or didn't support DIO at all. > > However, due to filesystem features that have been added over time (e.g, > data journalling, inline data, encryption, verity, compression, > checkpoint disabling, log-structured mode), the conditions for when DIO > is allowed on a file have gotten increasingly complex. Whether a > particular file supports DIO, and with what alignment, can depend on > various file attributes and filesystem mount options, as well as which > block device(s) the file's data is located on. > > XFS has an ioctl XFS_IOC_DIOINFO which exposes this information to > applications. However, as discussed > (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220120071215.123274-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u), > this ioctl is rarely used and not known to be used outside of > XFS-specific code. It also was never intended to indicate when a file > doesn't support DIO at all, and it only exposes the minimum I/O > alignment, not the optimal I/O alignment which has been requested too. > > Therefore, let's expose this information via statx(). Add the > STATX_IOALIGN flag and three fields associated with it: > > * stx_mem_align_dio: the alignment (in bytes) required for user memory > buffers for DIO, or 0 if DIO is not supported on the file. > > * stx_offset_align_dio: the alignment (in bytes) required for file > offsets and I/O segment lengths for DIO, or 0 if DIO is not supported > on the file. This will only be nonzero if stx_mem_align_dio is > nonzero, and vice versa. > > * stx_offset_align_optimal: the alignment (in bytes) suggested for file > offsets and I/O segment lengths to get optimal performance. This > applies to both DIO and buffered I/O. It differs from stx_blocksize > in that stx_offset_align_optimal will contain the real optimum I/O > size, which may be a large value. In contrast, for compatibility > reasons stx_blocksize is the minimum size needed to avoid page cache > read/write/modify cycles, which may be much smaller than the optimum > I/O size. For more details about the motivation for this field, see > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210040304.GM59729@dread.disaster.area > > Note that as with other statx() extensions, if STATX_IOALIGN isn't set > in the returned statx struct, then these new fields won't be filled in. > This will happen if the filesystem doesn't support STATX_IOALIGN, or if > the file isn't a regular file. (It might be supported on block device > files in the future.) It might also happen if the caller didn't include > STATX_IOALIGN in the request mask, since statx() isn't required to > return information that wasn't requested. > > This commit adds the VFS-level plumbing for STATX_IOALIGN. Individual > filesystems will still need to add code to support it. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > --- I've actually worked on similar series to export alignment and granularity for non-trivial operations, this implementation only exporting I/O alignments (mostly REQ_OP_WRITE/REQ_OP_READ) via stax. Since it is coming from :- bdev_logical_block_size()->q->limits.logical_block_size that is set when low level driver like nvme calls blk_queue_logical_block_size(). From my experience especially with SSDs, applications want to know similar information about different non-trivial requests such as REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES/REQ_OP_VERIFY (work in progress see [1]) etc. It will be great to make this generic userspace interface where user can ask for specific REQ_OP_XXX such as generic I/O REQ_OP_READ/REQ_OP_WRITE and non generic REQ_OP_XX such as REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_VERIFY etc .... Since I've worked on implementing REQ_OP_VERIFY support I don't want to implement separate interface for querying the REQ_OP_VERIFY or any other non-trivial REQ_OP_XXX granularity or alignment. -ck [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg56826.html
On 2/11/22 3:40 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 2/10/22 10:11 PM, Eric Biggers wrote: >> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> >> >> Traditionally, the conditions for when DIO (direct I/O) is supported >> were fairly simple: filesystems either supported DIO aligned to the >> block device's logical block size, or didn't support DIO at all. >> >> However, due to filesystem features that have been added over time (e.g, >> data journalling, inline data, encryption, verity, compression, >> checkpoint disabling, log-structured mode), the conditions for when DIO >> is allowed on a file have gotten increasingly complex. Whether a >> particular file supports DIO, and with what alignment, can depend on >> various file attributes and filesystem mount options, as well as which >> block device(s) the file's data is located on. >> >> XFS has an ioctl XFS_IOC_DIOINFO which exposes this information to >> applications. However, as discussed >> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220120071215.123274-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u), >> this ioctl is rarely used and not known to be used outside of >> XFS-specific code. It also was never intended to indicate when a file >> doesn't support DIO at all, and it only exposes the minimum I/O >> alignment, not the optimal I/O alignment which has been requested too. >> >> Therefore, let's expose this information via statx(). Add the >> STATX_IOALIGN flag and three fields associated with it: >> >> * stx_mem_align_dio: the alignment (in bytes) required for user memory >> buffers for DIO, or 0 if DIO is not supported on the file. >> >> * stx_offset_align_dio: the alignment (in bytes) required for file >> offsets and I/O segment lengths for DIO, or 0 if DIO is not supported >> on the file. This will only be nonzero if stx_mem_align_dio is >> nonzero, and vice versa. >> >> * stx_offset_align_optimal: the alignment (in bytes) suggested for file >> offsets and I/O segment lengths to get optimal performance. This >> applies to both DIO and buffered I/O. It differs from stx_blocksize >> in that stx_offset_align_optimal will contain the real optimum I/O >> size, which may be a large value. In contrast, for compatibility >> reasons stx_blocksize is the minimum size needed to avoid page cache >> read/write/modify cycles, which may be much smaller than the optimum >> I/O size. For more details about the motivation for this field, see >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210040304.GM59729@dread.disaster.area >> >> Note that as with other statx() extensions, if STATX_IOALIGN isn't set >> in the returned statx struct, then these new fields won't be filled in. >> This will happen if the filesystem doesn't support STATX_IOALIGN, or if >> the file isn't a regular file. (It might be supported on block device >> files in the future.) It might also happen if the caller didn't include >> STATX_IOALIGN in the request mask, since statx() isn't required to >> return information that wasn't requested. >> >> This commit adds the VFS-level plumbing for STATX_IOALIGN. Individual >> filesystems will still need to add code to support it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> >> --- > > > I've actually worked on similar series to export alignment and > granularity for non-trivial operations, this implementation > only exporting I/O alignments (mostly REQ_OP_WRITE/REQ_OP_READ) via > stax. > > Since it is coming from :- > bdev_logical_block_size()->q->limits.logical_block_size that is set when > low level driver like nvme calls blk_queue_logical_block_size(). > > From my experience especially with SSDs, applications want to > know similar information about different non-trivial requests such as > REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES/REQ_OP_VERIFY (work in progress see > [1]) etc. > > It will be great to make this generic userspace interface where user can > ask for specific REQ_OP_XXX such as generic I/O REQ_OP_READ/REQ_OP_WRITE > and non generic REQ_OP_XX such as REQ_OP_DISCARD/REQ_OP_VERIFY etc .... > > Since I've worked on implementing REQ_OP_VERIFY support I don't want to > implement separate interface for querying the REQ_OP_VERIFY or any other > non-trivial REQ_OP_XXX granularity or alignment. > > -ck > > [1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-xfs%2Fmsg56826.html&data=04%7C01%7Cchaitanyak%40nvidia.com%7C252d78e009ad49bd522208d9ed534dcf%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637801764313014840%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=1owqIDlcst4h%2FGr9Azteaiy22vfHFZojRipKmk6A%2FCg%3D&reserved=0 > Adding right link for REQ_OP_VERIFY ... [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg56826.html
diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c index 28d2020ba1f42..093c506e69c7b 100644 --- a/fs/stat.c +++ b/fs/stat.c @@ -598,6 +598,9 @@ cp_statx(const struct kstat *stat, struct statx __user *buffer) tmp.stx_dev_major = MAJOR(stat->dev); tmp.stx_dev_minor = MINOR(stat->dev); tmp.stx_mnt_id = stat->mnt_id; + tmp.stx_mem_align_dio = stat->mem_align_dio; + tmp.stx_offset_align_dio = stat->offset_align_dio; + tmp.stx_offset_align_optimal = stat->offset_align_optimal; return copy_to_user(buffer, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) ? -EFAULT : 0; } diff --git a/include/linux/stat.h b/include/linux/stat.h index 7df06931f25d8..48b8b1ad1567c 100644 --- a/include/linux/stat.h +++ b/include/linux/stat.h @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ struct kstat { struct timespec64 btime; /* File creation time */ u64 blocks; u64 mnt_id; + u32 mem_align_dio; + u32 offset_align_dio; + u32 offset_align_optimal; }; #endif diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h index 1500a0f58041a..f822b23e81091 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h @@ -124,9 +124,13 @@ struct statx { __u32 stx_dev_minor; /* 0x90 */ __u64 stx_mnt_id; - __u64 __spare2; + __u32 stx_mem_align_dio; /* Memory buffer alignment for direct I/O */ + __u32 stx_offset_align_dio; /* File offset alignment for direct I/O */ /* 0xa0 */ - __u64 __spare3[12]; /* Spare space for future expansion */ + __u32 stx_offset_align_optimal; /* Optimal file offset alignment for I/O */ + __u32 __spare2; + /* 0xa8 */ + __u64 __spare3[11]; /* Spare space for future expansion */ /* 0x100 */ }; @@ -152,6 +156,7 @@ struct statx { #define STATX_BASIC_STATS 0x000007ffU /* The stuff in the normal stat struct */ #define STATX_BTIME 0x00000800U /* Want/got stx_btime */ #define STATX_MNT_ID 0x00001000U /* Got stx_mnt_id */ +#define STATX_IOALIGN 0x00002000U /* Want/got IO alignment info */ #define STATX__RESERVED 0x80000000U /* Reserved for future struct statx expansion */