Message ID | 20220211103818.8266-1-jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 SoC | expand |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:38:13PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 44 + > sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile | 21 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.c | 719 ++++ > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.h | 210 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h | 245 ++ > .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c | 262 ++ > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.c | 211 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.h | 19 + > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c | 3030 +++++++++++++++ > .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-interconnection.h | 69 + > .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-misc-control.c | 1729 +++++++++ > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-reg.h | 3433 +++++++++++++++++ I know it's already a long series but perhaps the clock and GPIO bits could be split out into separate patches? This one patch is over 300K which is a bit much in one go, especially when it's not just all big tables.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:38:03PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > This series of patches adds support for Mediatek AFE of MT8186 Soc. > Patches are based on broonie tree "for-next" branch. This all looks basically good, there are some issues which I've highlighted on the patches but like I kept on saying they're all fairly small and hopefully easy to address - there's no big structural problems or anything that I noticed.
On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 16:14 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:38:03PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > > This series of patches adds support for Mediatek AFE of MT8186 Soc. > > Patches are based on broonie tree "for-next" branch. > > This all looks basically good, there are some issues which I've > highlighted on the patches but like I kept on saying they're all > fairly > small and hopefully easy to address - there's no big structural > problems > or anything that I noticed. Thank you for helping to review my submitted patches. I will go through your comments carefully and fix them.
On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 16:12 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:38:13PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > > > sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 44 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/Makefile | 21 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.c | 719 ++++ > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-clk.h | 210 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-common.h | 245 ++ > > .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c | 262 ++ > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.c | 211 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-gpio.h | 19 + > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-pcm.c | 3030 > > +++++++++++++++ > > .../mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-interconnection.h | 69 + > > .../soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-misc-control.c | 1729 +++++++++ > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-reg.h | 3433 > > +++++++++++++++++ > > I know it's already a long series but perhaps the clock and GPIO bits > could be split out into separate patches? This one patch is over > 300K > which is a bit much in one go, especially when it's not just all big > tables. Ok, I see. I've split them out into separate patches in v2 version.