diff mbox series

[V4,2/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement device MSIX vector allocator

Message ID 20220203072735.189716-3-lingshan.zhu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Zhu, Lingshan Feb. 3, 2022, 7:27 a.m. UTC
This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
for vqs and config interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jason Wang Feb. 14, 2022, 6:26 a.m. UTC | #1
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
> for vqs and config interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> @@ -58,14 +58,45 @@ static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>   	ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>   }
>   
> +/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
> + * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
> + * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
> + * return value when fails.
> + */
> +static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> +	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> +	int max_intr, ret;
> +
> +	/* all queues and config interrupt  */
> +	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
> +	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret < max_intr)
> +		IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
> +			   "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, lower performance\n",
> +			   max_intr, ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>   {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>   	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
> -	int vector, i, ret, irq;
> +	int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
>   	u16 max_intr;
>   
> -	/* all queues and config interrupt  */
> +	nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
> +	if (!(nvectors > 0))
> +		return nvectors;


Why not simply checking by using nvectors <= 0? If ifcvf_alloc_vectors 
can return 0 this breaks the ifcvf_request_irq() caller's assumption.


> +
>   	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>   
>   	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,


So irq is allocated twice here?

Thanks
Zhu, Lingshan Feb. 14, 2022, 6:46 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2/14/2022 2:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
>> This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
>> for vqs and config interrupts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c 
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> @@ -58,14 +58,45 @@ static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter 
>> *adapter, int queues)
>>       ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>>   }
>>   +/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
>> + * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
>> + * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
>> + * return value when fails.
>> + */
>> +static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> +    struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>> +    struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> +    int max_intr, ret;
>> +
>> +    /* all queues and config interrupt  */
>> +    max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>> +    ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | 
>> PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
>> +
>> +    if (ret < 0) {
>> +        IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
>> +        return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (ret < max_intr)
>> +        IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
>> +               "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, 
>> lower performance\n",
>> +               max_intr, ret);
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>   {
>>       struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>       struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>> -    int vector, i, ret, irq;
>> +    int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
>>       u16 max_intr;
>>   -    /* all queues and config interrupt  */
>> +    nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
>> +    if (!(nvectors > 0))
>> +        return nvectors;
>
>
> Why not simply checking by using nvectors <= 0? If ifcvf_alloc_vectors 
> can return 0 this breaks the ifcvf_request_irq() caller's assumption.
It can return zero if no vectors allocated, then ifcvf_request_irq 
fails. For sure I can use <=0

Thanks!
>
>
>> +
>>       max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>>         ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
>
>
> So irq is allocated twice here?
Oh, it is a rebasing problem, I should move the deleting line here from 
the next patch.

Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -58,14 +58,45 @@  static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
 	ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
 }
 
+/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
+ * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
+ * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
+ * return value when fails.
+ */
+static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
+	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
+	int max_intr, ret;
+
+	/* all queues and config interrupt  */
+	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
+	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
+
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (ret < max_intr)
+		IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
+			   "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, lower performance\n",
+			   max_intr, ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
 	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
-	int vector, i, ret, irq;
+	int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
 	u16 max_intr;
 
-	/* all queues and config interrupt  */
+	nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
+	if (!(nvectors > 0))
+		return nvectors;
+
 	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
 
 	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,