Message ID | 20220215031642.1691873-7-npiggin@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ppc: nested KVM HV for spapr virtual hypervisor | expand |
On 2/15/22 04:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles > hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case. > > Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Thanks, C. > --- > target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > index fcc83a7701..6b6ec71bc2 100644 > --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c > @@ -1278,6 +1278,18 @@ static void powerpc_excp_booke(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) > } > > #ifdef TARGET_PPC64 > +/* > + * When running under vhyp, hcalls are always intercepted and sent to the > + * vhc->hypercall handler. > + */ > +static bool books_vhyp_handles_hcall(PowerPCCPU *cpu) > +{ > + if (cpu->vhyp) { > + return true; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) > { > CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); > @@ -1439,7 +1451,7 @@ static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) > env->nip += 4; > > /* "PAPR mode" built-in hypercall emulation */ > - if ((lev == 1) && cpu->vhyp) { > + if ((lev == 1) && books_vhyp_handles_hcall(cpu)) { > PPCVirtualHypervisorClass *vhc = > PPC_VIRTUAL_HYPERVISOR_GET_CLASS(cpu->vhyp); > vhc->hypercall(cpu->vhyp, cpu); >
diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c index fcc83a7701..6b6ec71bc2 100644 --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c @@ -1278,6 +1278,18 @@ static void powerpc_excp_booke(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) } #ifdef TARGET_PPC64 +/* + * When running under vhyp, hcalls are always intercepted and sent to the + * vhc->hypercall handler. + */ +static bool books_vhyp_handles_hcall(PowerPCCPU *cpu) +{ + if (cpu->vhyp) { + return true; + } + return false; +} + static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) { CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); @@ -1439,7 +1451,7 @@ static void powerpc_excp_books(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp) env->nip += 4; /* "PAPR mode" built-in hypercall emulation */ - if ((lev == 1) && cpu->vhyp) { + if ((lev == 1) && books_vhyp_handles_hcall(cpu)) { PPCVirtualHypervisorClass *vhc = PPC_VIRTUAL_HYPERVISOR_GET_CLASS(cpu->vhyp); vhc->hypercall(cpu->vhyp, cpu);
The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case. Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> --- target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)