Message ID | 20220204130855.39520-6-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | s390x: smp: use CPU indexes instead of addresses | expand |
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 14:08 +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > Adapt the test to the new semantics of the smp_* functions, and use > CPU > indexes instead of addresses. > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/4/22 14:08, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > Adapt the test to the new semantics of the smp_* functions, and use CPU > indexes instead of addresses. > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/s390x/skrf.c b/s390x/skrf.c index ca4efbf1..b9a2e902 100644 --- a/s390x/skrf.c +++ b/s390x/skrf.c @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void test_exception_ext_new(void) wait_for_flag(); set_flag(0); - sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL); + smp_sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL); wait_for_flag(); smp_cpu_stop(1); report_prefix_pop();
Adapt the test to the new semantics of the smp_* functions, and use CPU indexes instead of addresses. Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> --- s390x/skrf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)