Message ID | 20220209122706.42439-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mtd: spi-nor / spi / MFD: Convert intel-spi to SPI MEM | expand |
Hi, Mark, The series is looking good to me. If you too find it good, would you take it directly to SPI via an immutable branch and sync with Lee? There's no need to sync with MTD, as I haven't took and won't take any intel-spi patches for v5.17. If you want me to provide an immutable branch to both of you, that's fine as well. Cheers, ta
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:27:03 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Based on discussion on the patch I sent some time ago here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2021-June/086867.html > > it turns out that the preferred way to deal with the SPI flash controller > drivers is through SPI MEM which is part of Linux SPI subsystem. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Thanks! [1/3] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Disable write protection only if asked commit: cd149eff8d2201a63c074a6d9d03e52926aa535d [2/3] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Convert to SPI MEM commit: e23e5a05d1fd9479586c40ffbcc056b3e34ef816 [3/3] Documentation / MTD: Rename the intel-spi driver commit: 4ab13489735d9b5b6e91634eab83922914a3310c All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
On 2/15/22 14:54, Mark Brown wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:27:03 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> Based on discussion on the patch I sent some time ago here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2021-June/086867.html >> >> it turns out that the preferred way to deal with the SPI flash controller >> drivers is through SPI MEM which is part of Linux SPI subsystem. >> >> [...] > > Applied to > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Hi, Mark, Have you synced with Lee Jones? I remember he asked for an immutable branch when the patch set will be applied. There's no need to sync with MTD. Cheers, ta > > Thanks! > > [1/3] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Disable write protection only if asked > commit: cd149eff8d2201a63c074a6d9d03e52926aa535d > [2/3] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Convert to SPI MEM > commit: e23e5a05d1fd9479586c40ffbcc056b3e34ef816 > [3/3] Documentation / MTD: Rename the intel-spi driver > commit: 4ab13489735d9b5b6e91634eab83922914a3310c
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:46:13PM +0000, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: > Have you synced with Lee Jones? I remember he asked for an immutable branch > when the patch set will be applied. There's no need to sync with MTD. I think I sent out a pull request? Or perhaps I didn't if you explicitly said you didn't want one. I don't remember at this point.