Message ID | cover.1645024354.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm/damon: Add NUMA access statistics function support | expand |
+ David Rientjes, who has shown interest[1] in this topic. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/bcc8d9a0-81d-5f34-5e4-fcc28eb7ce@google.com/ --- Hi Xin, Thank you always for great patches! On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:30:36 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > On today's cloud computing service scenario, NUMA (non uniform memory access) > architecture server has been applied on a large scale. Using Damon function, > it can easily and lightweight identify hot and cold memory, but it can not > display the situation of locale and remote NUMA memory access. > > The purpose of these serie patches is to identify the situation of NUMA access > in combination with DAMON, especially for remote NUMA access in hot memory. > We hope to detect this situation in the data center and use page migration or > multi backup page technology to optimize the behavior of memory access. > > So next, we will further improve Damon NUMA function: > 1. Support hugtlbfs NUMA access statistics. > 2. Add the DAMO tool to parse NUMA local & remote in "damon_region" support. > 3. For hot memory remote NUMA access, support page migration or multi backup page. > > About DAMON correctness of numa access statistics > We wrote a test case, allocate about 1G memory, and use numa_alloc(), set 512M in > NUMA node0 and 512M in NUMA node1, and The test case alternately accesses the 1G of memory. > > We used "perf record -e damon:damon_aggregated" and "perf script" > cmd to obtain data, like this: > kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473056325632-281473127964672:: 12 0 5243 5513 > kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473127964672-281473238028288: 8 1 5427 5399 > ... > kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473056325632-281473127964672: 9 3 7669 7632 > kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473127964672-281473238028288: 7 2 7913 7892 > > And compared with numastat like this: > Per-node process memory usage (in MBs) for PID 111676 (lt-numademo) > Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 > --------------- --------------- --------------- > Huge 0.00 0.00 0.00 > Heap 0.02 0.00 0.00 > Stack 0.01 0.00 0.00 > Private 565.24 564.00 0.00 > ---------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- > Total 565.27 564.00 0.00 > This comparison can determine the accuracy of Damon NUMA memory access statistics. > > About the impact of DAMON NUMA access on Performance > During the benchmakr test, we found that the MBW benchmark memcpy test item > will cause about 3% performance degradation, and there is no performance degradation > in other benchmarks. > So we added "numa_stat" switch in DAMON dbgfs interface, turn on this switch when NUMA access > statistics is required. > > > Xin Hao (5): > mm/damon: Add NUMA local and remote variables in 'damon_region' > mm/damon: Add 'damon_region' NUMA fault simulation support > mm/damon: Add 'damon_region' NUMA access statistics core > implementation > mm/damon/dbgfs: Add numa simulate switch > mm/damon/tracepoint: Add 'damon_region' NUMA access statistics support > > include/linux/damon.h | 25 ++++++++++ > include/trace/events/damon.h | 9 +++- > mm/damon/core.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > mm/damon/paddr.c | 25 ++++++++-- > mm/damon/prmtv-common.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++ > mm/damon/prmtv-common.h | 3 ++ > mm/damon/vaddr.c | 45 ++++++++++------- > mm/huge_memory.c | 5 ++ > mm/memory.c | 5 ++ > 10 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) I'd like to comment on the high level design at the moment. To my understanding, this patchset extends DAMON core and monitoring operations for virtual address spaces (vaddr) and the physical address space (paddr) to monitor NUMA-local/remote accesses via PROT_NONE and page faults mechanism. The underlying mechanism for NUMA-local/remote accesses (PROT_NONE and page fault) looks ok to me. But, changes to the core and vaddr/paddr operations looks unnecessary, to me. That's also not for general use cases. I think it would be simpler to implment more monitoring operations for NUMA monitoring use case (one for NUMA-local accesses accounting and another one for NUMA-remote accesses accounting), alongside vaddr and paddr. Then, users could configure DAMON to have three monitoring contexts (one with vaddr ops, second one with numa-local ops, and third one with numa-remote ops), run those concurrently, then show the three results and make some decisions like migrations. One additional advantage of this approach is that the accuracy for NUMA-local/remote accessed could be better, because the contexts configured to use NUMA-local/remote monitoring ops will do the regions adjustment with NUMA-local/remote accesses (to my understanding, this patchset let regions have NUMA-local/remote accesses counter in addition to the total one, but still use only the total one for the regions adjustment). If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks, SJ > > -- > 2.27.0
Hi SeongJae: On 2/17/22 4:29 PM, SeongJae Park wrote: > + David Rientjes, who has shown interest[1] in this topic. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/bcc8d9a0-81d-5f34-5e4-fcc28eb7ce@google.com/ > > --- > > Hi Xin, > > > Thank you always for great patches! > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:30:36 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > >> On today's cloud computing service scenario, NUMA (non uniform memory access) >> architecture server has been applied on a large scale. Using Damon function, >> it can easily and lightweight identify hot and cold memory, but it can not >> display the situation of locale and remote NUMA memory access. >> >> The purpose of these serie patches is to identify the situation of NUMA access >> in combination with DAMON, especially for remote NUMA access in hot memory. >> We hope to detect this situation in the data center and use page migration or >> multi backup page technology to optimize the behavior of memory access. >> >> So next, we will further improve Damon NUMA function: >> 1. Support hugtlbfs NUMA access statistics. >> 2. Add the DAMO tool to parse NUMA local & remote in "damon_region" support. >> 3. For hot memory remote NUMA access, support page migration or multi backup page. >> >> About DAMON correctness of numa access statistics >> We wrote a test case, allocate about 1G memory, and use numa_alloc(), set 512M in >> NUMA node0 and 512M in NUMA node1, and The test case alternately accesses the 1G of memory. >> >> We used "perf record -e damon:damon_aggregated" and "perf script" >> cmd to obtain data, like this: >> kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473056325632-281473127964672:: 12 0 5243 5513 >> kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473127964672-281473238028288: 8 1 5427 5399 >> ... >> kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473056325632-281473127964672: 9 3 7669 7632 >> kdamond.0 target_id=0 nr_regions=10 281473127964672-281473238028288: 7 2 7913 7892 >> >> And compared with numastat like this: >> Per-node process memory usage (in MBs) for PID 111676 (lt-numademo) >> Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 >> --------------- --------------- --------------- >> Huge 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> Heap 0.02 0.00 0.00 >> Stack 0.01 0.00 0.00 >> Private 565.24 564.00 0.00 >> ---------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- >> Total 565.27 564.00 0.00 >> This comparison can determine the accuracy of Damon NUMA memory access statistics. >> >> About the impact of DAMON NUMA access on Performance >> During the benchmakr test, we found that the MBW benchmark memcpy test item >> will cause about 3% performance degradation, and there is no performance degradation >> in other benchmarks. >> So we added "numa_stat" switch in DAMON dbgfs interface, turn on this switch when NUMA access >> statistics is required. >> >> >> Xin Hao (5): >> mm/damon: Add NUMA local and remote variables in 'damon_region' >> mm/damon: Add 'damon_region' NUMA fault simulation support >> mm/damon: Add 'damon_region' NUMA access statistics core >> implementation >> mm/damon/dbgfs: Add numa simulate switch >> mm/damon/tracepoint: Add 'damon_region' NUMA access statistics support >> >> include/linux/damon.h | 25 ++++++++++ >> include/trace/events/damon.h | 9 +++- >> mm/damon/core.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> mm/damon/paddr.c | 25 ++++++++-- >> mm/damon/prmtv-common.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++ >> mm/damon/prmtv-common.h | 3 ++ >> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 45 ++++++++++------- >> mm/huge_memory.c | 5 ++ >> mm/memory.c | 5 ++ >> 10 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > I'd like to comment on the high level design at the moment. To my > understanding, this patchset extends DAMON core and monitoring operations for > virtual address spaces (vaddr) and the physical address space (paddr) to > monitor NUMA-local/remote accesses via PROT_NONE and page faults mechanism. > > The underlying mechanism for NUMA-local/remote accesses (PROT_NONE and page > fault) looks ok to me. But, changes to the core and vaddr/paddr operations > looks unnecessary, to me. That's also not for general use cases. You are right, adding NUMA access statistics does make the PA & VA codes look confusing。 > > I think it would be simpler to implment more monitoring operations for NUMA > monitoring use case (one for NUMA-local accesses accounting and another one for > NUMA-remote accesses accounting), alongside vaddr and paddr. Then, users could > configure DAMON to have three monitoring contexts (one with vaddr ops, second > one with numa-local ops, and third one with numa-remote ops), run those > concurrently, then show the three results and make some decisions like > migrations. Thanks for your advice, I will implement these in the next version, But from my understanding or maybe I didn't get what you were thinking, I think only one monitor context is needed for NUMA Local & Remote, Do not need a separate implementation like "numa_local_ops" and "numa_remote_ops", just set "numa_access_ops" is ok. > > One additional advantage of this approach is that the accuracy for > NUMA-local/remote accessed could be better, because the contexts configured to > use NUMA-local/remote monitoring ops will do the regions adjustment with > NUMA-local/remote accesses (to my understanding, this patchset let regions have > NUMA-local/remote accesses counter in addition to the total one, but still use > only the total one for the regions adjustment). > > If I'm missing something, please let me know. > > > Thanks, > SJ > >> -- >> 2.27.0
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:21:27 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > Hi SeongJae: > > On 2/17/22 4:29 PM, SeongJae Park wrote: > > + David Rientjes, who has shown interest[1] in this topic. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/bcc8d9a0-81d-5f34-5e4-fcc28eb7ce@google.com/ > > > > --- > > > > Hi Xin, > > > > > > Thank you always for great patches! > > > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:30:36 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > [...] > > I'd like to comment on the high level design at the moment. To my > > understanding, this patchset extends DAMON core and monitoring operations for > > virtual address spaces (vaddr) and the physical address space (paddr) to > > monitor NUMA-local/remote accesses via PROT_NONE and page faults mechanism. > > > > The underlying mechanism for NUMA-local/remote accesses (PROT_NONE and page > > fault) looks ok to me. But, changes to the core and vaddr/paddr operations > > looks unnecessary, to me. That's also not for general use cases. > You are right, adding NUMA access statistics does make the PA & VA codes > look confusing。 > > > > I think it would be simpler to implment more monitoring operations for NUMA > > monitoring use case (one for NUMA-local accesses accounting and another one for > > NUMA-remote accesses accounting), alongside vaddr and paddr. Then, users could > > configure DAMON to have three monitoring contexts (one with vaddr ops, second > > one with numa-local ops, and third one with numa-remote ops), run those > > concurrently, then show the three results and make some decisions like > > migrations. > > Thanks for your advice, I will implement these in the next version, But > from my understanding or maybe > > I didn't get what you were thinking, I think only one monitor context is > needed for NUMA Local & Remote, > > Do not need a separate implementation like "numa_local_ops" and > "numa_remote_ops", just set "numa_access_ops" is ok. Sorry for insufficient explanation of my concern. In short, I'm concerning about the regions adjustment. You may do so by storing NUMA-local access count and NUMA-remote access count in the nr_acceses filed of each region, e.g., saving NUMA-local access count in upper-half bits of nr_accesses and saving NUMA-remote access count in the lower-half bits. However, then DAMON will do the regions adjustment based on the NUMA-local/remote accesses count mixed value, so the accuracy would be degraded. So I think we need to implement each monitoring operations set for each accesses that we want to monitor. > > > > > One additional advantage of this approach is that the accuracy for > > NUMA-local/remote accessed could be better, because the contexts configured to > > use NUMA-local/remote monitoring ops will do the regions adjustment with > > NUMA-local/remote accesses (to my understanding, this patchset let regions have > > NUMA-local/remote accesses counter in addition to the total one, but still use > > only the total one for the regions adjustment). My previous comment above might help clarifying my concern. If I'm missing something, please let me know. Thanks, SJ > > > > If I'm missing something, please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks, > > SJ > > > >> -- > >> 2.27.0 > > -- > Best Regards! > Xin Hao >