Message ID | 20210817091456.73342-1-hare@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | SCSI EH argument reshuffle part II | expand |
First, thanks for resurrecting the series. Second, this giant patchbomb is almost impossible to review. It might make sense to resend what is the prep patches without the prototype changes after the first round of review - maybe we can squeeze those into 5.15 still and do the heavy lifting with another series per actually changes method or so.
On 8/17/21 2:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > First, thanks for resurrecting the series. > > Second, this giant patchbomb is almost impossible to review. It might > make sense to resend what is the prep patches without the prototype > changes after the first round of review - maybe we can squeeze those > into 5.15 still and do the heavy lifting with another series per > actually changes method or so. > Sure, can do. Cheers, Hannes
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:55:25PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 8/17/21 2:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > First, thanks for resurrecting the series. > > > > Second, this giant patchbomb is almost impossible to review. It might > > make sense to resend what is the prep patches without the prototype > > changes after the first round of review - maybe we can squeeze those > > into 5.15 still and do the heavy lifting with another series per > > actually changes method or so. > > > Sure, can do. Do you have another chunk of these patches ready? It would be so nice to see the EH code finally cleaned up..
On 2/23/22 13:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:55:25PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> On 8/17/21 2:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> First, thanks for resurrecting the series. >>> >>> Second, this giant patchbomb is almost impossible to review. It might >>> make sense to resend what is the prep patches without the prototype >>> changes after the first round of review - maybe we can squeeze those >>> into 5.15 still and do the heavy lifting with another series per >>> actually changes method or so. >>> >> Sure, can do. > > Do you have another chunk of these patches ready? It would be so nice > to see the EH code finally cleaned up.. Sure. Against which tree? The SCSI pointer and scsi_request removal will have an impact onto these patches I guess, so I'd rather code against those patches folded in. Cheers, Hannes
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Sure. Against which tree? > The SCSI pointer and scsi_request removal will have an impact onto these > patches I guess, so I'd rather code against those patches folded in. The SCSI pointer removal already is in Martin's staging tree, so that is a good baseline. I don't think the the scsi_request removal should have much overlap with the various driver patches and just a trivial overlap with the scsi_ioctl_reset changes. So maybe just prepare a first batch that is needed for the eh_host_reset prototype changes against Martin's staging tree?