diff mbox series

[RFC,v14,02/10] NFSD: Add lm_lock_expired call out

Message ID 1645640197-1725-3-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server | expand

Commit Message

Dai Ngo Feb. 23, 2022, 6:16 p.m. UTC
Add callout function nfsd4_lm_lock_expired for lm_lock_expired.
If lock request has conflict with courtesy client then expire the
courtesy client and return no conflict to caller.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

Comments

Chuck Lever III Feb. 25, 2022, 4:29 p.m. UTC | #1
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:16 PM, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Add callout function nfsd4_lm_lock_expired for lm_lock_expired.
> If lock request has conflict with courtesy client then expire the
> courtesy client and return no conflict to caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 6a10f089ef4c..6bca727978ea 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -6578,10 +6578,47 @@ nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
> 	}
> }
> 
> +/**
> + * nfsd4_lm_lock_expired - check if lock conflict can be resolved.
> + *
> + * @fl: pointer to file_lock with a potential conflict
> + * Return values:
> + *   %false: real conflict, lock conflict can not be resolved.
> + *   %true: no conflict, lock conflict was resolved.
> + *
> + * Note that this function is called while the flc_lock is held.
> + */
> +static bool
> +nfsd4_lm_lock_expired(struct file_lock *fl)
> +{
> +	struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
> +	struct nfs4_client *clp;
> +	bool rc = false;
> +
> +	if (!fl)
> +		return false;
> +	lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)fl->fl_owner;
> +	clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
> +
> +	/* need to sync with courtesy client trying to reconnect */
> +	spin_lock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
> +	if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags))
> +		rc = true;
> +	else {
> +		if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_COURTESY, &clp->cl_flags)) {
> +			set_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags);
> +			rc =  true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops  = {
> 	.lm_notify = nfsd4_lm_notify,
> 	.lm_get_owner = nfsd4_fl_get_owner,
> 	.lm_put_owner = nfsd4_fl_put_owner,

I started to pull this series, but quickly realized it isn't
based on the current contents of the NFSD for-next topic
branch, which changes the names of nfsd4_fl_{put,get}_owner
as we discussed during v13 review.

The upshot is that I would have to apply each of these patches
by hand, which is tedious and error prone for more than one
or two patches.

Please pull the latest from my for-next branch, rebase this
series, and then post again. Thanks!


> +	.lm_lock_expired = nfsd4_lm_lock_expired,
> };
> 
> static inline void
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 

--
Chuck Lever
Dai Ngo Feb. 28, 2022, 6:05 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2/25/22 8:29 AM, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:16 PM, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add callout function nfsd4_lm_lock_expired for lm_lock_expired.
>> If lock request has conflict with courtesy client then expire the
>> courtesy client and return no conflict to caller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 6a10f089ef4c..6bca727978ea 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -6578,10 +6578,47 @@ nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
>> 	}
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * nfsd4_lm_lock_expired - check if lock conflict can be resolved.
>> + *
>> + * @fl: pointer to file_lock with a potential conflict
>> + * Return values:
>> + *   %false: real conflict, lock conflict can not be resolved.
>> + *   %true: no conflict, lock conflict was resolved.
>> + *
>> + * Note that this function is called while the flc_lock is held.
>> + */
>> +static bool
>> +nfsd4_lm_lock_expired(struct file_lock *fl)
>> +{
>> +	struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
>> +	struct nfs4_client *clp;
>> +	bool rc = false;
>> +
>> +	if (!fl)
>> +		return false;
>> +	lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)fl->fl_owner;
>> +	clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
>> +
>> +	/* need to sync with courtesy client trying to reconnect */
>> +	spin_lock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
>> +	if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags))
>> +		rc = true;
>> +	else {
>> +		if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_COURTESY, &clp->cl_flags)) {
>> +			set_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags);
>> +			rc =  true;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops  = {
>> 	.lm_notify = nfsd4_lm_notify,
>> 	.lm_get_owner = nfsd4_fl_get_owner,
>> 	.lm_put_owner = nfsd4_fl_put_owner,
> I started to pull this series, but quickly realized it isn't
> based on the current contents of the NFSD for-next topic
> branch, which changes the names of nfsd4_fl_{put,get}_owner
> as we discussed during v13 review.
>
> The upshot is that I would have to apply each of these patches
> by hand, which is tedious and error prone for more than one
> or two patches.
>
> Please pull the latest from my for-next branch, rebase this
> series, and then post again. Thanks!'

will do in v15.

-Dai

>
>
>> +	.lm_lock_expired = nfsd4_lm_lock_expired,
>> };
>>
>> static inline void
>> -- 
>> 2.9.5
>>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 6a10f089ef4c..6bca727978ea 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -6578,10 +6578,47 @@  nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * nfsd4_lm_lock_expired - check if lock conflict can be resolved.
+ *
+ * @fl: pointer to file_lock with a potential conflict
+ * Return values:
+ *   %false: real conflict, lock conflict can not be resolved.
+ *   %true: no conflict, lock conflict was resolved.
+ *
+ * Note that this function is called while the flc_lock is held.
+ */
+static bool
+nfsd4_lm_lock_expired(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+	struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
+	struct nfs4_client *clp;
+	bool rc = false;
+
+	if (!fl)
+		return false;
+	lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)fl->fl_owner;
+	clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+
+	/* need to sync with courtesy client trying to reconnect */
+	spin_lock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
+	if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags))
+		rc = true;
+	else {
+		if (test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_COURTESY, &clp->cl_flags)) {
+			set_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_EXPIRED, &clp->cl_flags);
+			rc =  true;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_cs_lock);
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops  = {
 	.lm_notify = nfsd4_lm_notify,
 	.lm_get_owner = nfsd4_fl_get_owner,
 	.lm_put_owner = nfsd4_fl_put_owner,
+	.lm_lock_expired = nfsd4_lm_lock_expired,
 };
 
 static inline void