| Message ID | 20220311173041.165948-1-axboe@kernel.dk (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix raid rebuild performance regression | expand |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:30 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: > > Hi, > > This should fix the reported RAID rebuild regression, while also > providing better performance for other workloads particularly on > rotating storage. Thanks for the fix! Reviewed-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. On 11.03.22 18:30, Jens Axboe wrote: > > This should fix the reported RAID rebuild regression, while also > providing better performance for other workloads particularly on > rotating storage. Nitpicking: From the list of CCed people it seems these patches are fixing this regression: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/0eb91a43-a153-6e29-14b6-65f97b9f3d99@nuclearwinter.com/ Then the patch descriptions for the two commits should include a link tag to the report, as per using lore.kernel.org/r/, as explained in 'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst' and 'Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst'. And the original reporters likely should be honored with a "Reported-by", too. The former would my regression tracking life a lot easier, as regzbot relies on those links that are useful for other purposes, too (as explained in the docs). Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. #regzbot ^backmonitor: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/0eb91a43-a153-6e29-14b6-65f97b9f3d99@nuclearwinter.com/