diff mbox series

mmc: renesas_sdhi: special 4tap settings only apply to HS400

Message ID 20220401124523.42892-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series mmc: renesas_sdhi: special 4tap settings only apply to HS400 | expand

Commit Message

Wolfram Sang April 1, 2022, 12:45 p.m. UTC
Previous doucmentation was vague, so we included SDR104 for slow SDnH
clock settings. It turns out now, that it is only needed for HS400.

Fixes: bb6d3fa98a41 ("clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Switch to new SD clock handling")
Reported-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Yoshihiro Shimoda April 4, 2022, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Wolfram-san,

Thank you for the patch!

> From: Wolfram Sang, Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 9:45 PM
> 
> Previous doucmentation was vague, so we included SDR104 for slow SDnH

s/doucmentation/documentation/

> clock settings. It turns out now, that it is only needed for HS400.
> 
> Fixes: bb6d3fa98a41 ("clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Switch to new SD clock handling")
> Reported-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

After fixed the typo,

Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
Wolfram Sang April 4, 2022, 10:05 a.m. UTC | #2
> > Previous doucmentation was vague, so we included SDR104 for slow SDnH
> 
> s/doucmentation/documentation/

Oops, thank you! v2 sent out now.
Geert Uytterhoeven April 4, 2022, 12:14 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Wolfram,

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:49 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> Previous doucmentation was vague, so we included SDR104 for slow SDnH
> clock settings. It turns out now, that it is only needed for HS400.
>
> Fixes: bb6d3fa98a41 ("clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Switch to new SD clock handling")
> Reported-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

(after fixing the typo)
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,
>                 return clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
>
>         if (priv->clkh) {
> +               /* HS400 with 4TAP needs different clock settings */
>                 bool use_4tap = priv->quirks && priv->quirks->hs400_4taps;
> -               bool need_slow_clkh = (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) ||
> -                                     (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
> +               bool need_slow_clkh = host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;

I'm wondering if we've lost the critical mass for keeping the bools?

>                 clkh_shift = use_4tap && need_slow_clkh ? 1 : 2;

Unfortunately I don't see a good way to rewrite this, without inflating
source code size...

>                 ref_clk = priv->clkh;
>         }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Wolfram Sang April 4, 2022, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #4
> >                 bool use_4tap = priv->quirks && priv->quirks->hs400_4taps;
> > -               bool need_slow_clkh = (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) ||
> > -                                     (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
> > +               bool need_slow_clkh = host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
> 
> I'm wondering if we've lost the critical mass for keeping the bools?

Might be. I'll think about it.
Wolfram Sang April 6, 2022, 8:14 p.m. UTC | #5
> I'm wondering if we've lost the critical mass for keeping the bools?

So, I had a look at this and think that the current version is still way
better in terms of readability. I think the compilers will optimize
enough. It is not a hot path anyway. So, I'd like to keep the code.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
index 2797a9c0f17d..2a4d314aa027 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@  static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,
 		return clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
 
 	if (priv->clkh) {
+		/* HS400 with 4TAP needs different clock settings */
 		bool use_4tap = priv->quirks && priv->quirks->hs400_4taps;
-		bool need_slow_clkh = (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) ||
-				      (host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400);
+		bool need_slow_clkh = host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400;
 		clkh_shift = use_4tap && need_slow_clkh ? 1 : 2;
 		ref_clk = priv->clkh;
 	}